Connecting legal and social justice in the neo-liberal world?: the construction interpretation and use of pre-sentence reports

Cyrus Tata, Stewart Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The legitimacy of state-imposed punishment depends on more than the making of
lawful decisions. The sentencing process is legitimated also by looking outwards
beyond narrow legal criteria so as to accommodate individualized substantive justice, including some recognition of social disadvantage. Pre-sentence reports1 are the main way in which sentencing brings together these legal and social conceptions of justice. In their advice and assistance to sentencers, reports enable penal decision making to accommodate ‘external’ context, while also rapidly processing a high volume of cases. Indeed, the instrumentally ‘efficient’ disposal of cases may well hinge upon the expression of individualization and humanity
LanguageEnglish
Pages235–238
Number of pages4
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

social justice
justice
decision making
interpretation
individualization
penalty
legitimacy
assistance

Keywords

  • sentencing
  • pre-sentence reports
  • pre-sentence investigation
  • comparative penology
  • actuarial justice

Cite this

@article{d6e85b0b5182402499818c138cf90786,
title = "Connecting legal and social justice in the neo-liberal world?: the construction interpretation and use of pre-sentence reports",
abstract = "The legitimacy of state-imposed punishment depends on more than the making oflawful decisions. The sentencing process is legitimated also by looking outwardsbeyond narrow legal criteria so as to accommodate individualized substantive justice, including some recognition of social disadvantage. Pre-sentence reports1 are the main way in which sentencing brings together these legal and social conceptions of justice. In their advice and assistance to sentencers, reports enable penal decision making to accommodate ‘external’ context, while also rapidly processing a high volume of cases. Indeed, the instrumentally ‘efficient’ disposal of cases may well hinge upon the expression of individualization and humanity",
keywords = "sentencing, pre-sentence reports, pre-sentence investigation, comparative penology, actuarial justice",
author = "Cyrus Tata and Stewart Field",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1462474510369440",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "235–238",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
number = "3",

}

Connecting legal and social justice in the neo-liberal world? the construction interpretation and use of pre-sentence reports. / Tata, Cyrus; Field , Stewart .

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 12, No. 3, 07.2010, p. 235–238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connecting legal and social justice in the neo-liberal world?

T2 - Punishment and Society

AU - Tata, Cyrus

AU - Field , Stewart

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - The legitimacy of state-imposed punishment depends on more than the making oflawful decisions. The sentencing process is legitimated also by looking outwardsbeyond narrow legal criteria so as to accommodate individualized substantive justice, including some recognition of social disadvantage. Pre-sentence reports1 are the main way in which sentencing brings together these legal and social conceptions of justice. In their advice and assistance to sentencers, reports enable penal decision making to accommodate ‘external’ context, while also rapidly processing a high volume of cases. Indeed, the instrumentally ‘efficient’ disposal of cases may well hinge upon the expression of individualization and humanity

AB - The legitimacy of state-imposed punishment depends on more than the making oflawful decisions. The sentencing process is legitimated also by looking outwardsbeyond narrow legal criteria so as to accommodate individualized substantive justice, including some recognition of social disadvantage. Pre-sentence reports1 are the main way in which sentencing brings together these legal and social conceptions of justice. In their advice and assistance to sentencers, reports enable penal decision making to accommodate ‘external’ context, while also rapidly processing a high volume of cases. Indeed, the instrumentally ‘efficient’ disposal of cases may well hinge upon the expression of individualization and humanity

KW - sentencing

KW - pre-sentence reports

KW - pre-sentence investigation

KW - comparative penology

KW - actuarial justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954898940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1462474510369440

DO - 10.1177/1462474510369440

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 235

EP - 238

JO - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 3

ER -