Connecting ecosystem services research and human rights to revamp the application of the precautionary principle

Holly J. Niner*, Elisa Morgera, Andrea Longo, Kerry L. Howell, Siân E. Rees

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With ecosystem services (ES) vital for human wellbeing1, the protection of nature is a human rights matter. We outline how recent advances in international human rights law should inform a revamp of how precaution is applied within environmental decision-making. Critically, precautionary decision-making must evolve to make use of best-available evidence, including novel ES research approaches, to assess ‘foreseeable’ harms to all aspects of human wellbeing that are protected as human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Article number35
Number of pages3
Journalnpj Ocean Sustainability
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • human rights
  • nature
  • harms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting ecosystem services research and human rights to revamp the application of the precautionary principle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this