Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Congressional leadership 1965-96: a new look at the extremism versus centrality debate

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

An examination of the differences between the ideological positions of leaders and other members in the U.S. House of Representatives (1965-96) demonstrates that Republican leaders tend to be significantly to the right of the median Republican member and Democratic leaders tend to be significantly to the left of the median Democratic member. Furthermore, leaders from both parties tend to be ideologically located near the mode of their party's ideological distribution. These empirical results have implications for issues such as party polarization, conditional party government, and the possibility of separating out party and ideology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-105
Number of pages19
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Volume27
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2002

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • states
  • law
  • political parties
  • partisanship
  • opinion
  • spatial model
  • curvilinear disparity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Congressional leadership 1965-96: a new look at the extremism versus centrality debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this