Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care

Hollie V Thomas, Glyn Lewis, Margaret Watson, Truda Bell, Ita Lyons, Keith Lloyd, Scott Weich, Deborah Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.AIM: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.DESIGN OF STUDY: Individual patient randomised controlled trial.SETTING: Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.METHOD: 762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.RESULTS: Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3% greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.CONCLUSION: Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.
LanguageEnglish
Pages832-837
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume54
Issue number508
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Mental Disorders
Primary Health Care
Guidelines
General Practitioners
Anxiety
Depression
Health
Patient Satisfaction
General Practice
Appointments and Schedules
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Public Health
Quality of Life
Confidence Intervals
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • adult
  • aged
  • anxiety disorders
  • decision making, computer-assisted
  • depressive disorder
  • family practice
  • follow-up studies
  • humans
  • mental disorders
  • middle aged
  • patient satisfaction
  • practice guidelines as topic
  • quality of life
  • treatment outcome

Cite this

Thomas, H. V., Lewis, G., Watson, M., Bell, T., Lyons, I., Lloyd, K., ... Sharp, D. (2004). Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 54(508), 832-837.
Thomas, Hollie V ; Lewis, Glyn ; Watson, Margaret ; Bell, Truda ; Lyons, Ita ; Lloyd, Keith ; Weich, Scott ; Sharp, Deborah. / Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2004 ; Vol. 54, No. 508. pp. 832-837.
@article{a6463845a272400283a65f4882b2c810,
title = "Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.AIM: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.DESIGN OF STUDY: Individual patient randomised controlled trial.SETTING: Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.METHOD: 762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.RESULTS: Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3{\%} greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.CONCLUSION: Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.",
keywords = "adolescent, adult, aged, anxiety disorders, decision making, computer-assisted, depressive disorder, family practice, follow-up studies, humans, mental disorders, middle aged, patient satisfaction, practice guidelines as topic, quality of life, treatment outcome",
author = "Thomas, {Hollie V} and Glyn Lewis and Margaret Watson and Truda Bell and Ita Lyons and Keith Lloyd and Scott Weich and Deborah Sharp",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "832--837",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
number = "508",

}

Thomas, HV, Lewis, G, Watson, M, Bell, T, Lyons, I, Lloyd, K, Weich, S & Sharp, D 2004, 'Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care' British Journal of General Practice, vol. 54, no. 508, pp. 832-837.

Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care. / Thomas, Hollie V; Lewis, Glyn; Watson, Margaret; Bell, Truda; Lyons, Ita; Lloyd, Keith; Weich, Scott; Sharp, Deborah.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 54, No. 508, 11.2004, p. 832-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care

AU - Thomas, Hollie V

AU - Lewis, Glyn

AU - Watson, Margaret

AU - Bell, Truda

AU - Lyons, Ita

AU - Lloyd, Keith

AU - Weich, Scott

AU - Sharp, Deborah

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.AIM: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.DESIGN OF STUDY: Individual patient randomised controlled trial.SETTING: Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.METHOD: 762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.RESULTS: Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3% greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.CONCLUSION: Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.

AB - BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.AIM: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.DESIGN OF STUDY: Individual patient randomised controlled trial.SETTING: Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.METHOD: 762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.RESULTS: Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3% greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.CONCLUSION: Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - anxiety disorders

KW - decision making, computer-assisted

KW - depressive disorder

KW - family practice

KW - follow-up studies

KW - humans

KW - mental disorders

KW - middle aged

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - practice guidelines as topic

KW - quality of life

KW - treatment outcome

UR - https://bjgp.org/

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 832

EP - 837

JO - British Journal of General Practice

T2 - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 508

ER -