Computer assisted knee replacement surgery: is the movement mainstream?

Frederic Picard, Jon Clarke, Kamal Deep, Alberto Gregori

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Abstract

The first computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was performed in 1997. The FDA approved computer assisted knee arthroplasty systems used in the early 2000s. Since then, surgeons and institutions all over the world have gradually adopted the technology. While the computer holds an importance place in the majority of workspaces across all industries, computer-assisted surgical technique has yet to become the preferred tool of the orthopaedic surgeon. Why has "e-instrumentation" not yet substituted conventional instrumentation in TKA orthopaedic surgery? In this article, we argue that main reasons which oppose the use of this technology are based on inaccurate or misleading observations. We isolated the factors likely to explain such opposition to this innovation: current results of total knee replacement, surgeon age, operative time, system ergonomics, cost for users, and cost for suppliers and "disruptive" innovations. Other factors such as surgeon habits, hospital environment and available assistance for support, although relevant, are not discussed. We assessed the advantages and drawbacks, costs and benefits of this technology to assess whether or not this opposition is justified. Finally, we explored the reasons why such a technology may impel surgeons to use this technique or any "related technologies" in the future. The main factors limiting TKA navigation spreading amongst orthopaedic surgeons are ergonomics and economics. Other factors, such as current TKA outcomes and surgeon's age are fallacious arguments in the rebuttal of CAS system use. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty surgery is not yet mainstream, but TKA will not escape technological progress.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalOrthopedic & Muscular System
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Knee prostheses
Arthroplasty
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Surgery
Knee
Orthopedics
Technology
Ergonomics
Human Engineering
Innovation
Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Operative Time
Navigation
Habits
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Industry
Economics
Surgeons

Keywords

  • total knee arthroplasty
  • arthroplasty
  • orthopaedic surgery
  • computer-assisted knee arthroplasty
  • TKA

Cite this

Picard, Frederic ; Clarke, Jon ; Deep, Kamal ; Gregori, Alberto. / Computer assisted knee replacement surgery : is the movement mainstream?. In: Orthopedic & Muscular System. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 2.
@article{6f5e78f732004f83b1b97ffad9144289,
title = "Computer assisted knee replacement surgery: is the movement mainstream?",
abstract = "The first computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was performed in 1997. The FDA approved computer assisted knee arthroplasty systems used in the early 2000s. Since then, surgeons and institutions all over the world have gradually adopted the technology. While the computer holds an importance place in the majority of workspaces across all industries, computer-assisted surgical technique has yet to become the preferred tool of the orthopaedic surgeon. Why has {"}e-instrumentation{"} not yet substituted conventional instrumentation in TKA orthopaedic surgery? In this article, we argue that main reasons which oppose the use of this technology are based on inaccurate or misleading observations. We isolated the factors likely to explain such opposition to this innovation: current results of total knee replacement, surgeon age, operative time, system ergonomics, cost for users, and cost for suppliers and {"}disruptive{"} innovations. Other factors such as surgeon habits, hospital environment and available assistance for support, although relevant, are not discussed. We assessed the advantages and drawbacks, costs and benefits of this technology to assess whether or not this opposition is justified. Finally, we explored the reasons why such a technology may impel surgeons to use this technique or any {"}related technologies{"} in the future. The main factors limiting TKA navigation spreading amongst orthopaedic surgeons are ergonomics and economics. Other factors, such as current TKA outcomes and surgeon's age are fallacious arguments in the rebuttal of CAS system use. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty surgery is not yet mainstream, but TKA will not escape technological progress.",
keywords = "total knee arthroplasty, arthroplasty, orthopaedic surgery, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, TKA",
author = "Frederic Picard and Jon Clarke and Kamal Deep and Alberto Gregori",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.4172/2161-0533.1000153",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Orthopedic & Muscular System",
issn = "2161-0533",
number = "2",

}

Computer assisted knee replacement surgery : is the movement mainstream? / Picard, Frederic; Clarke, Jon; Deep, Kamal; Gregori, Alberto.

In: Orthopedic & Muscular System, Vol. 3, No. 2, 15.06.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer assisted knee replacement surgery

T2 - Orthopedic & Muscular System

AU - Picard, Frederic

AU - Clarke, Jon

AU - Deep, Kamal

AU - Gregori, Alberto

PY - 2014/6/15

Y1 - 2014/6/15

N2 - The first computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was performed in 1997. The FDA approved computer assisted knee arthroplasty systems used in the early 2000s. Since then, surgeons and institutions all over the world have gradually adopted the technology. While the computer holds an importance place in the majority of workspaces across all industries, computer-assisted surgical technique has yet to become the preferred tool of the orthopaedic surgeon. Why has "e-instrumentation" not yet substituted conventional instrumentation in TKA orthopaedic surgery? In this article, we argue that main reasons which oppose the use of this technology are based on inaccurate or misleading observations. We isolated the factors likely to explain such opposition to this innovation: current results of total knee replacement, surgeon age, operative time, system ergonomics, cost for users, and cost for suppliers and "disruptive" innovations. Other factors such as surgeon habits, hospital environment and available assistance for support, although relevant, are not discussed. We assessed the advantages and drawbacks, costs and benefits of this technology to assess whether or not this opposition is justified. Finally, we explored the reasons why such a technology may impel surgeons to use this technique or any "related technologies" in the future. The main factors limiting TKA navigation spreading amongst orthopaedic surgeons are ergonomics and economics. Other factors, such as current TKA outcomes and surgeon's age are fallacious arguments in the rebuttal of CAS system use. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty surgery is not yet mainstream, but TKA will not escape technological progress.

AB - The first computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was performed in 1997. The FDA approved computer assisted knee arthroplasty systems used in the early 2000s. Since then, surgeons and institutions all over the world have gradually adopted the technology. While the computer holds an importance place in the majority of workspaces across all industries, computer-assisted surgical technique has yet to become the preferred tool of the orthopaedic surgeon. Why has "e-instrumentation" not yet substituted conventional instrumentation in TKA orthopaedic surgery? In this article, we argue that main reasons which oppose the use of this technology are based on inaccurate or misleading observations. We isolated the factors likely to explain such opposition to this innovation: current results of total knee replacement, surgeon age, operative time, system ergonomics, cost for users, and cost for suppliers and "disruptive" innovations. Other factors such as surgeon habits, hospital environment and available assistance for support, although relevant, are not discussed. We assessed the advantages and drawbacks, costs and benefits of this technology to assess whether or not this opposition is justified. Finally, we explored the reasons why such a technology may impel surgeons to use this technique or any "related technologies" in the future. The main factors limiting TKA navigation spreading amongst orthopaedic surgeons are ergonomics and economics. Other factors, such as current TKA outcomes and surgeon's age are fallacious arguments in the rebuttal of CAS system use. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty surgery is not yet mainstream, but TKA will not escape technological progress.

KW - total knee arthroplasty

KW - arthroplasty

KW - orthopaedic surgery

KW - computer-assisted knee arthroplasty

KW - TKA

UR - http://omicsonline.org/orthopedic-muscular-system-current-research.php

U2 - 10.4172/2161-0533.1000153

DO - 10.4172/2161-0533.1000153

M3 - Literature review

VL - 3

JO - Orthopedic & Muscular System

JF - Orthopedic & Muscular System

SN - 2161-0533

IS - 2

ER -