Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: the case of Spain (2001-2003)

Irene Criado, Manuel Fernandez, Larrinaga Carlos, Javier Husillos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corporate, Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting (SEER) should ideally discharge the accountability of an organisation to its stakeholders. Voluntary reporting has been characterised by a dearth of neutral and objective information such that the advocates of SEER recommend that it be made compulsory. Their underlying rationale is that legally specified disclosure requirements and enforcement mechanisms will enhance the quality of such reporting. This paper sets out to explore how realistic this scenario actually is, in view of the conflicting interpretations in the literature on this subject. To that end, a survey of the reporting patterns of 78 of the largest Spanish companies between 2001 and 2003 examines the extent of their compliance with the ICAC-2002 standard, which obliged them to make environmental disclosures in their financial statements. The results suggest that progressive and improved regulation could increase the volume and quality of SEER disclosures. They also suggest, however, that persistent non-compliance means that the problems associated with voluntary disclosure still exist. Finally, through an impression management perspective, the study reveals, the diverse strategies, ranging from dismissal to concealment, that are employed by companies to avoid transparency. As regulation improves and enforcement expectations rise, it becomes more difficult to dismiss compulsory reporting norms. As a result, some firms engage in more complex concealment strategies to attain corporate legitimacy, depriving stakeholders of regulatory information. The latter point serves to reconcile apparently contradictory explanations in the literature as to whether legitimacy theory might explain partial compliance with SEER regulation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages245-262
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume79
Issue number3
Early online date5 Apr 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Federal Government Report on Social Policy
environmental reporting
Spain
regulation
legitimacy
stakeholder
dismissal
transparency
scenario
firm
responsibility
interpretation
Financial statements
Environmental reporting
Disclosure
management

Keywords

  • accountability
  • business ethics
  • mandatory environmental disclosure
  • environmental reporting
  • Spain

Cite this

Criado, Irene ; Fernandez, Manuel ; Carlos, Larrinaga ; Husillos, Javier. / Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements : the case of Spain (2001-2003). In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2008 ; Vol. 79, No. 3. pp. 245-262.
@article{5e51e487a0014fb0845e4cc6979c40b3,
title = "Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: the case of Spain (2001-2003)",
abstract = "Corporate, Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting (SEER) should ideally discharge the accountability of an organisation to its stakeholders. Voluntary reporting has been characterised by a dearth of neutral and objective information such that the advocates of SEER recommend that it be made compulsory. Their underlying rationale is that legally specified disclosure requirements and enforcement mechanisms will enhance the quality of such reporting. This paper sets out to explore how realistic this scenario actually is, in view of the conflicting interpretations in the literature on this subject. To that end, a survey of the reporting patterns of 78 of the largest Spanish companies between 2001 and 2003 examines the extent of their compliance with the ICAC-2002 standard, which obliged them to make environmental disclosures in their financial statements. The results suggest that progressive and improved regulation could increase the volume and quality of SEER disclosures. They also suggest, however, that persistent non-compliance means that the problems associated with voluntary disclosure still exist. Finally, through an impression management perspective, the study reveals, the diverse strategies, ranging from dismissal to concealment, that are employed by companies to avoid transparency. As regulation improves and enforcement expectations rise, it becomes more difficult to dismiss compulsory reporting norms. As a result, some firms engage in more complex concealment strategies to attain corporate legitimacy, depriving stakeholders of regulatory information. The latter point serves to reconcile apparently contradictory explanations in the literature as to whether legitimacy theory might explain partial compliance with SEER regulation.",
keywords = "accountability, business ethics, mandatory environmental disclosure, environmental reporting, Spain",
author = "Irene Criado and Manuel Fernandez and Larrinaga Carlos and Javier Husillos",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-007-9375-7",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "245--262",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
number = "3",

}

Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements : the case of Spain (2001-2003). / Criado, Irene; Fernandez, Manuel; Carlos, Larrinaga; Husillos, Javier.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 79, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 245-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements

T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

AU - Criado, Irene

AU - Fernandez, Manuel

AU - Carlos, Larrinaga

AU - Husillos, Javier

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Corporate, Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting (SEER) should ideally discharge the accountability of an organisation to its stakeholders. Voluntary reporting has been characterised by a dearth of neutral and objective information such that the advocates of SEER recommend that it be made compulsory. Their underlying rationale is that legally specified disclosure requirements and enforcement mechanisms will enhance the quality of such reporting. This paper sets out to explore how realistic this scenario actually is, in view of the conflicting interpretations in the literature on this subject. To that end, a survey of the reporting patterns of 78 of the largest Spanish companies between 2001 and 2003 examines the extent of their compliance with the ICAC-2002 standard, which obliged them to make environmental disclosures in their financial statements. The results suggest that progressive and improved regulation could increase the volume and quality of SEER disclosures. They also suggest, however, that persistent non-compliance means that the problems associated with voluntary disclosure still exist. Finally, through an impression management perspective, the study reveals, the diverse strategies, ranging from dismissal to concealment, that are employed by companies to avoid transparency. As regulation improves and enforcement expectations rise, it becomes more difficult to dismiss compulsory reporting norms. As a result, some firms engage in more complex concealment strategies to attain corporate legitimacy, depriving stakeholders of regulatory information. The latter point serves to reconcile apparently contradictory explanations in the literature as to whether legitimacy theory might explain partial compliance with SEER regulation.

AB - Corporate, Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting (SEER) should ideally discharge the accountability of an organisation to its stakeholders. Voluntary reporting has been characterised by a dearth of neutral and objective information such that the advocates of SEER recommend that it be made compulsory. Their underlying rationale is that legally specified disclosure requirements and enforcement mechanisms will enhance the quality of such reporting. This paper sets out to explore how realistic this scenario actually is, in view of the conflicting interpretations in the literature on this subject. To that end, a survey of the reporting patterns of 78 of the largest Spanish companies between 2001 and 2003 examines the extent of their compliance with the ICAC-2002 standard, which obliged them to make environmental disclosures in their financial statements. The results suggest that progressive and improved regulation could increase the volume and quality of SEER disclosures. They also suggest, however, that persistent non-compliance means that the problems associated with voluntary disclosure still exist. Finally, through an impression management perspective, the study reveals, the diverse strategies, ranging from dismissal to concealment, that are employed by companies to avoid transparency. As regulation improves and enforcement expectations rise, it becomes more difficult to dismiss compulsory reporting norms. As a result, some firms engage in more complex concealment strategies to attain corporate legitimacy, depriving stakeholders of regulatory information. The latter point serves to reconcile apparently contradictory explanations in the literature as to whether legitimacy theory might explain partial compliance with SEER regulation.

KW - accountability

KW - business ethics

KW - mandatory environmental disclosure

KW - environmental reporting

KW - Spain

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-007-9375-7

DO - 10.1007/s10551-007-9375-7

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 245

EP - 262

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 3

ER -