Complementary logics of target-setting: hierarchist and experimentalist governance in the Scottish National Health Service

Laura Schang, Alec Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Where policy ends are contested and means for change are ambiguous, imposing central targets on local organisations – what we call hierarchist governance – is problematic. The concept of experimentalist governance suggests that target-setting should rather be a learning process between central regulators and local organisations. However, the relationship between experimentalist and hierarchist governance remains unclear. Existing literature suggests that the learning-oriented experimentalist logic is hard to reconcile with a hierarchist logic focussed on accountability for results. We examine whether complementary use of hierarchist and experimentalist ideas is possible. Drawing on experiences from Scotland, we find that experimentalist and hierarchist logics can co-exist in the same performance management system. Each logic served distinct roles with respect to target-setting, implementation and accountability. The emphasis on experimentalism was stronger where ends and means were contested (the case of shifting the balance of care for older people) than where both ends and means seemed obvious initially (the case of healthcare-associated infections, where target-setting followed a more hierarchist logic). However, governance drifted towards experimentalism when rising rates of community-acquired infections decreased clarity about effective interventions. The nature of policy issues and changes therein over time appear to be important conditions for synergies between governance logics.
LanguageEnglish
Pages21-41
Number of pages21
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date20 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Social Responsibility
Learning
Organizations
Community-Acquired Infections
Scotland
Cross Infection

Keywords

  • governance
  • national health service
  • Scottish national health service

Cite this

@article{5c3610be2d6c410791baffe7a2b1da3a,
title = "Complementary logics of target-setting: hierarchist and experimentalist governance in the Scottish National Health Service",
abstract = "Where policy ends are contested and means for change are ambiguous, imposing central targets on local organisations – what we call hierarchist governance – is problematic. The concept of experimentalist governance suggests that target-setting should rather be a learning process between central regulators and local organisations. However, the relationship between experimentalist and hierarchist governance remains unclear. Existing literature suggests that the learning-oriented experimentalist logic is hard to reconcile with a hierarchist logic focussed on accountability for results. We examine whether complementary use of hierarchist and experimentalist ideas is possible. Drawing on experiences from Scotland, we find that experimentalist and hierarchist logics can co-exist in the same performance management system. Each logic served distinct roles with respect to target-setting, implementation and accountability. The emphasis on experimentalism was stronger where ends and means were contested (the case of shifting the balance of care for older people) than where both ends and means seemed obvious initially (the case of healthcare-associated infections, where target-setting followed a more hierarchist logic). However, governance drifted towards experimentalism when rising rates of community-acquired infections decreased clarity about effective interventions. The nature of policy issues and changes therein over time appear to be important conditions for synergies between governance logics.",
keywords = "governance , national health service, Scottish national health service",
author = "Laura Schang and Alec Morton",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1744133116000232",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "21--41",
journal = "Health Economics, Policy and Law",
issn = "1744-1331",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary logics of target-setting

T2 - Health Economics, Policy and Law

AU - Schang, Laura

AU - Morton, Alec

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Where policy ends are contested and means for change are ambiguous, imposing central targets on local organisations – what we call hierarchist governance – is problematic. The concept of experimentalist governance suggests that target-setting should rather be a learning process between central regulators and local organisations. However, the relationship between experimentalist and hierarchist governance remains unclear. Existing literature suggests that the learning-oriented experimentalist logic is hard to reconcile with a hierarchist logic focussed on accountability for results. We examine whether complementary use of hierarchist and experimentalist ideas is possible. Drawing on experiences from Scotland, we find that experimentalist and hierarchist logics can co-exist in the same performance management system. Each logic served distinct roles with respect to target-setting, implementation and accountability. The emphasis on experimentalism was stronger where ends and means were contested (the case of shifting the balance of care for older people) than where both ends and means seemed obvious initially (the case of healthcare-associated infections, where target-setting followed a more hierarchist logic). However, governance drifted towards experimentalism when rising rates of community-acquired infections decreased clarity about effective interventions. The nature of policy issues and changes therein over time appear to be important conditions for synergies between governance logics.

AB - Where policy ends are contested and means for change are ambiguous, imposing central targets on local organisations – what we call hierarchist governance – is problematic. The concept of experimentalist governance suggests that target-setting should rather be a learning process between central regulators and local organisations. However, the relationship between experimentalist and hierarchist governance remains unclear. Existing literature suggests that the learning-oriented experimentalist logic is hard to reconcile with a hierarchist logic focussed on accountability for results. We examine whether complementary use of hierarchist and experimentalist ideas is possible. Drawing on experiences from Scotland, we find that experimentalist and hierarchist logics can co-exist in the same performance management system. Each logic served distinct roles with respect to target-setting, implementation and accountability. The emphasis on experimentalism was stronger where ends and means were contested (the case of shifting the balance of care for older people) than where both ends and means seemed obvious initially (the case of healthcare-associated infections, where target-setting followed a more hierarchist logic). However, governance drifted towards experimentalism when rising rates of community-acquired infections decreased clarity about effective interventions. The nature of policy issues and changes therein over time appear to be important conditions for synergies between governance logics.

KW - governance

KW - national health service

KW - Scottish national health service

UR - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayBackIssues?jid=HEP

U2 - 10.1017/S1744133116000232

DO - 10.1017/S1744133116000232

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 21

EP - 41

JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law

JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law

SN - 1744-1331

IS - 1

ER -