Competition law preliminary rulings: a quantitative and qualitative overview post regulation 1/2003

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Article 267 TFEU (ex Art 234 EC) facilitates a dialogue between the national courts and the CJEU (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Court’) in order to allow national courts to seek guidance on the appropriate interpretation of EU law principles in a particular legal dispute, and from an EU perspective this process seek to enhance the uniform and consistent interpretation of EU law throughout the national courts. The importance of the Article 267 preliminary ruling procedure in developing key principles of EU law, has been stressed on numerous occasions, and in a competition law context, it has been noted that “the preliminary reference procedure has had a disproportionately significant impact on the substantive development of EU competition law.” The significance of the preliminary ruling procedure for EU competition law was clearly demonstrated by my earlier work in this area in Article 234 and Competition Law: An Analysis which provided an analysis of all of the competition-law related rulings by the Court of Justice to 1st May 2004 and this was followed by work which gave an overview of preliminary rulings between 1 May 2004 and end November 2011. This article seeks to update this earlier research and in particular ascertain to what extent the competition law preliminary ruling practice has evolved since the introduction of Regulation 1/2003 and the decentralised context generally for the enforcement of EU competition law.
LanguageEnglish
Pages125-139
Number of pages15
JournalGlobal Competition Litigation Review
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

regulation
Law
European Law
EU
court of justice
interpretation
European Community
dialogue
art

Keywords

  • competition law
  • litigation
  • national courts

Cite this

@article{fa1c212451204728b2f26a8d115e6d76,
title = "Competition law preliminary rulings: a quantitative and qualitative overview post regulation 1/2003",
abstract = "Article 267 TFEU (ex Art 234 EC) facilitates a dialogue between the national courts and the CJEU (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Court’) in order to allow national courts to seek guidance on the appropriate interpretation of EU law principles in a particular legal dispute, and from an EU perspective this process seek to enhance the uniform and consistent interpretation of EU law throughout the national courts. The importance of the Article 267 preliminary ruling procedure in developing key principles of EU law, has been stressed on numerous occasions, and in a competition law context, it has been noted that “the preliminary reference procedure has had a disproportionately significant impact on the substantive development of EU competition law.” The significance of the preliminary ruling procedure for EU competition law was clearly demonstrated by my earlier work in this area in Article 234 and Competition Law: An Analysis which provided an analysis of all of the competition-law related rulings by the Court of Justice to 1st May 2004 and this was followed by work which gave an overview of preliminary rulings between 1 May 2004 and end November 2011. This article seeks to update this earlier research and in particular ascertain to what extent the competition law preliminary ruling practice has evolved since the introduction of Regulation 1/2003 and the decentralised context generally for the enforcement of EU competition law.",
keywords = "competition law, litigation, national courts",
author = "Barry Rodger",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "125--139",
journal = "Global Competition Litigation Review",
issn = "1756-6002",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competition law preliminary rulings

T2 - Global Competition Litigation Review

AU - Rodger, Barry

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Article 267 TFEU (ex Art 234 EC) facilitates a dialogue between the national courts and the CJEU (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Court’) in order to allow national courts to seek guidance on the appropriate interpretation of EU law principles in a particular legal dispute, and from an EU perspective this process seek to enhance the uniform and consistent interpretation of EU law throughout the national courts. The importance of the Article 267 preliminary ruling procedure in developing key principles of EU law, has been stressed on numerous occasions, and in a competition law context, it has been noted that “the preliminary reference procedure has had a disproportionately significant impact on the substantive development of EU competition law.” The significance of the preliminary ruling procedure for EU competition law was clearly demonstrated by my earlier work in this area in Article 234 and Competition Law: An Analysis which provided an analysis of all of the competition-law related rulings by the Court of Justice to 1st May 2004 and this was followed by work which gave an overview of preliminary rulings between 1 May 2004 and end November 2011. This article seeks to update this earlier research and in particular ascertain to what extent the competition law preliminary ruling practice has evolved since the introduction of Regulation 1/2003 and the decentralised context generally for the enforcement of EU competition law.

AB - Article 267 TFEU (ex Art 234 EC) facilitates a dialogue between the national courts and the CJEU (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Court’) in order to allow national courts to seek guidance on the appropriate interpretation of EU law principles in a particular legal dispute, and from an EU perspective this process seek to enhance the uniform and consistent interpretation of EU law throughout the national courts. The importance of the Article 267 preliminary ruling procedure in developing key principles of EU law, has been stressed on numerous occasions, and in a competition law context, it has been noted that “the preliminary reference procedure has had a disproportionately significant impact on the substantive development of EU competition law.” The significance of the preliminary ruling procedure for EU competition law was clearly demonstrated by my earlier work in this area in Article 234 and Competition Law: An Analysis which provided an analysis of all of the competition-law related rulings by the Court of Justice to 1st May 2004 and this was followed by work which gave an overview of preliminary rulings between 1 May 2004 and end November 2011. This article seeks to update this earlier research and in particular ascertain to what extent the competition law preliminary ruling practice has evolved since the introduction of Regulation 1/2003 and the decentralised context generally for the enforcement of EU competition law.

KW - competition law

KW - litigation

KW - national courts

UR - http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/catalogue/productdetails.aspx?recordid=2507&productid=274398

M3 - Article

SP - 125

EP - 139

JO - Global Competition Litigation Review

JF - Global Competition Litigation Review

SN - 1756-6002

ER -