Competence or confidence?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of the most suitable forum for discussions on the establishment of marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction, and on the complementary role of other international organizations and processes related to marine biodiversity and fisheries. In light of negotiations in 2005 and 2006 within the context of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations General Assembly, it is argued that consensus on the leading role of the General Assembly was based on political grounds - a judgement call based on the confidence in this forum to address ocean issues in an integrated manner - rather than strictly on the competence of the CBD in relation to the high seas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalReview of European Community and International Environmental Law
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2007

Fingerprint

United Nations
UNO
confidence
international organization
International Organizations
fishery
biodiversity
protected area
jurisdiction
ocean
convention
sea

Cite this

@article{5a8056c73c43444a94692142e50db4da,
title = "Competence or confidence?",
abstract = "This article addresses the question of the most suitable forum for discussions on the establishment of marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction, and on the complementary role of other international organizations and processes related to marine biodiversity and fisheries. In light of negotiations in 2005 and 2006 within the context of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations General Assembly, it is argued that consensus on the leading role of the General Assembly was based on political grounds - a judgement call based on the confidence in this forum to address ocean issues in an integrated manner - rather than strictly on the competence of the CBD in relation to the high seas.",
author = "Elisa Morgera",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00544.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Review of European Community and International Environmental Law",
issn = "0962-8797",
number = "1",

}

Competence or confidence? / Morgera, Elisa.

In: Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 16, No. 1, 10.04.2007, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competence or confidence?

AU - Morgera, Elisa

PY - 2007/4/10

Y1 - 2007/4/10

N2 - This article addresses the question of the most suitable forum for discussions on the establishment of marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction, and on the complementary role of other international organizations and processes related to marine biodiversity and fisheries. In light of negotiations in 2005 and 2006 within the context of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations General Assembly, it is argued that consensus on the leading role of the General Assembly was based on political grounds - a judgement call based on the confidence in this forum to address ocean issues in an integrated manner - rather than strictly on the competence of the CBD in relation to the high seas.

AB - This article addresses the question of the most suitable forum for discussions on the establishment of marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction, and on the complementary role of other international organizations and processes related to marine biodiversity and fisheries. In light of negotiations in 2005 and 2006 within the context of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations General Assembly, it is argued that consensus on the leading role of the General Assembly was based on political grounds - a judgement call based on the confidence in this forum to address ocean issues in an integrated manner - rather than strictly on the competence of the CBD in relation to the high seas.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00544.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00544.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

JF - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

SN - 0962-8797

IS - 1

ER -