Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children

G T Bell, J P J McEwen, S J Beaton, D Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared the work of breathing under general anaesthesia in children using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic systems. A pilot study was conducted in four children weighing > 20 kg in whom it would usually be considered appropriate to use breathing systems designed for adult anaesthesia. The pilot study compared work of breathing using the Mapleson D breathing system and the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (TSAA). Work of breathing was calculated using the modified Campbell technique that calculates work using a pressure volume loop derived from oesophageal pressure and airway gas volume measurements. We found no difference in the work of breathing when comparing the Mapleson D and the TSAA in children > 20 kg. Following completion of the pilot study, we conducted a study on 10 children weighing between 10 and 20 kg comparing work of breathing using the Mapleson F breathing system and the TSAA. We found no significant difference in the work of breathing between the Mapleson F and the TSAA for these children. The TSAA can therefore be recommended for use down to a lower weight limit of 10 kg.

LanguageEnglish
Pages359-63
Number of pages5
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Work of Breathing
Anesthetics
Respiration
Pressure
General Anesthesia
Anesthesia
Gases
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • anesthesia, Inhalation
  • body weight
  • child
  • cross-over studies
  • humans
  • pilot projects
  • work of breathing

Cite this

@article{a725cee2df574adf9ae45ca9c3321529,
title = "Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children",
abstract = "We compared the work of breathing under general anaesthesia in children using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic systems. A pilot study was conducted in four children weighing > 20 kg in whom it would usually be considered appropriate to use breathing systems designed for adult anaesthesia. The pilot study compared work of breathing using the Mapleson D breathing system and the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (TSAA). Work of breathing was calculated using the modified Campbell technique that calculates work using a pressure volume loop derived from oesophageal pressure and airway gas volume measurements. We found no difference in the work of breathing when comparing the Mapleson D and the TSAA in children > 20 kg. Following completion of the pilot study, we conducted a study on 10 children weighing between 10 and 20 kg comparing work of breathing using the Mapleson F breathing system and the TSAA. We found no significant difference in the work of breathing between the Mapleson F and the TSAA for these children. The TSAA can therefore be recommended for use down to a lower weight limit of 10 kg.",
keywords = "anesthesia, Inhalation, body weight, child, cross-over studies, humans, pilot projects, work of breathing",
author = "Bell, {G T} and McEwen, {J P J} and Beaton, {S J} and D Young",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04982.x",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "359--63",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children. / Bell, G T; McEwen, J P J; Beaton, S J; Young, D.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 62, No. 4, 01.04.2007, p. 359-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children

AU - Bell, G T

AU - McEwen, J P J

AU - Beaton, S J

AU - Young, D

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - We compared the work of breathing under general anaesthesia in children using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic systems. A pilot study was conducted in four children weighing > 20 kg in whom it would usually be considered appropriate to use breathing systems designed for adult anaesthesia. The pilot study compared work of breathing using the Mapleson D breathing system and the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (TSAA). Work of breathing was calculated using the modified Campbell technique that calculates work using a pressure volume loop derived from oesophageal pressure and airway gas volume measurements. We found no difference in the work of breathing when comparing the Mapleson D and the TSAA in children > 20 kg. Following completion of the pilot study, we conducted a study on 10 children weighing between 10 and 20 kg comparing work of breathing using the Mapleson F breathing system and the TSAA. We found no significant difference in the work of breathing between the Mapleson F and the TSAA for these children. The TSAA can therefore be recommended for use down to a lower weight limit of 10 kg.

AB - We compared the work of breathing under general anaesthesia in children using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic systems. A pilot study was conducted in four children weighing > 20 kg in whom it would usually be considered appropriate to use breathing systems designed for adult anaesthesia. The pilot study compared work of breathing using the Mapleson D breathing system and the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (TSAA). Work of breathing was calculated using the modified Campbell technique that calculates work using a pressure volume loop derived from oesophageal pressure and airway gas volume measurements. We found no difference in the work of breathing when comparing the Mapleson D and the TSAA in children > 20 kg. Following completion of the pilot study, we conducted a study on 10 children weighing between 10 and 20 kg comparing work of breathing using the Mapleson F breathing system and the TSAA. We found no significant difference in the work of breathing between the Mapleson F and the TSAA for these children. The TSAA can therefore be recommended for use down to a lower weight limit of 10 kg.

KW - anesthesia, Inhalation

KW - body weight

KW - child

KW - cross-over studies

KW - humans

KW - pilot projects

KW - work of breathing

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04982.x/abstract

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04982.x/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04982.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04982.x

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 359

EP - 363

JO - Anaesthesia

T2 - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 4

ER -