Comparison of the effectiveness of biphase and monophase rectangular pulses for the inactivation of microorganisms using pulsed electric fields

J.R. Beveridge, S.J. MacGregor, L. Marsili, J.G. Anderson, N. Rowan, O. Farish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of pulsed electric fields (PEF) for the inactivation of micro-organisms is currently of considerable interest as an alternative method to the conventional thermal methods of food pasteurization presently in widespread use. Many parameters of PEF influence the effectiveness of inactivation, one of which is the pulse profile, which is the subject of the present study. In this study, a pulse-forming network was designed and constructed to allow direct comparison of the effectiveness of a rectangular 'monophase' pulse (single polarity) with a rectangular 'biphase' pulse (incorporating a rapid reversal of polarity for the second half of the pulse). The pulses of 30 kV/cm in electric field intensity, 2 /spl mu/s in duration for monophase, and 1 /spl mu/s for each phase for biphase, were applied to parallel-plate test cells. Three different species of bacteria were tested including Gram negative and positive cell types. The bacteria were suspended in peptone water solutions of varied peptone concentration and hence, conductivity. The results show that, contrary to previous findings, biphase pulsing did not provide superior inactivation levels compared with monophase pulsing, for all three bacteria tested. Increasing the conductivity of the suspension fluid produced a general trend toward similar levels of inactivation of biphase compared with monophase PEF treatment, but in no case was it found that biphase PEF treatment was superior to monophase PEF treatment.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1525-1531
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

microorganisms
deactivation
electric fields
pulses
bacteria
polarity
conductivity
parallel plates
organisms
food
trends
fluids
profiles
cells
water

Keywords

  • microorganisms
  • plasma applications
  • plasma
  • electrical pulses

Cite this

@article{7f2e33e905e44c88aa9776250535a55d,
title = "Comparison of the effectiveness of biphase and monophase rectangular pulses for the inactivation of microorganisms using pulsed electric fields",
abstract = "The use of pulsed electric fields (PEF) for the inactivation of micro-organisms is currently of considerable interest as an alternative method to the conventional thermal methods of food pasteurization presently in widespread use. Many parameters of PEF influence the effectiveness of inactivation, one of which is the pulse profile, which is the subject of the present study. In this study, a pulse-forming network was designed and constructed to allow direct comparison of the effectiveness of a rectangular 'monophase' pulse (single polarity) with a rectangular 'biphase' pulse (incorporating a rapid reversal of polarity for the second half of the pulse). The pulses of 30 kV/cm in electric field intensity, 2 /spl mu/s in duration for monophase, and 1 /spl mu/s for each phase for biphase, were applied to parallel-plate test cells. Three different species of bacteria were tested including Gram negative and positive cell types. The bacteria were suspended in peptone water solutions of varied peptone concentration and hence, conductivity. The results show that, contrary to previous findings, biphase pulsing did not provide superior inactivation levels compared with monophase pulsing, for all three bacteria tested. Increasing the conductivity of the suspension fluid produced a general trend toward similar levels of inactivation of biphase compared with monophase PEF treatment, but in no case was it found that biphase PEF treatment was superior to monophase PEF treatment.",
keywords = "microorganisms, plasma applications, plasma, electrical pulses",
author = "J.R. Beveridge and S.J. MacGregor and L. Marsili and J.G. Anderson and N. Rowan and O. Farish",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1109/TPS.2002.804204",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1525--1531",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science",
issn = "0093-3813",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of the effectiveness of biphase and monophase rectangular pulses for the inactivation of microorganisms using pulsed electric fields. / Beveridge, J.R.; MacGregor, S.J.; Marsili, L.; Anderson, J.G.; Rowan, N.; Farish, O.

In: IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2002, p. 1525-1531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effectiveness of biphase and monophase rectangular pulses for the inactivation of microorganisms using pulsed electric fields

AU - Beveridge, J.R.

AU - MacGregor, S.J.

AU - Marsili, L.

AU - Anderson, J.G.

AU - Rowan, N.

AU - Farish, O.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The use of pulsed electric fields (PEF) for the inactivation of micro-organisms is currently of considerable interest as an alternative method to the conventional thermal methods of food pasteurization presently in widespread use. Many parameters of PEF influence the effectiveness of inactivation, one of which is the pulse profile, which is the subject of the present study. In this study, a pulse-forming network was designed and constructed to allow direct comparison of the effectiveness of a rectangular 'monophase' pulse (single polarity) with a rectangular 'biphase' pulse (incorporating a rapid reversal of polarity for the second half of the pulse). The pulses of 30 kV/cm in electric field intensity, 2 /spl mu/s in duration for monophase, and 1 /spl mu/s for each phase for biphase, were applied to parallel-plate test cells. Three different species of bacteria were tested including Gram negative and positive cell types. The bacteria were suspended in peptone water solutions of varied peptone concentration and hence, conductivity. The results show that, contrary to previous findings, biphase pulsing did not provide superior inactivation levels compared with monophase pulsing, for all three bacteria tested. Increasing the conductivity of the suspension fluid produced a general trend toward similar levels of inactivation of biphase compared with monophase PEF treatment, but in no case was it found that biphase PEF treatment was superior to monophase PEF treatment.

AB - The use of pulsed electric fields (PEF) for the inactivation of micro-organisms is currently of considerable interest as an alternative method to the conventional thermal methods of food pasteurization presently in widespread use. Many parameters of PEF influence the effectiveness of inactivation, one of which is the pulse profile, which is the subject of the present study. In this study, a pulse-forming network was designed and constructed to allow direct comparison of the effectiveness of a rectangular 'monophase' pulse (single polarity) with a rectangular 'biphase' pulse (incorporating a rapid reversal of polarity for the second half of the pulse). The pulses of 30 kV/cm in electric field intensity, 2 /spl mu/s in duration for monophase, and 1 /spl mu/s for each phase for biphase, were applied to parallel-plate test cells. Three different species of bacteria were tested including Gram negative and positive cell types. The bacteria were suspended in peptone water solutions of varied peptone concentration and hence, conductivity. The results show that, contrary to previous findings, biphase pulsing did not provide superior inactivation levels compared with monophase pulsing, for all three bacteria tested. Increasing the conductivity of the suspension fluid produced a general trend toward similar levels of inactivation of biphase compared with monophase PEF treatment, but in no case was it found that biphase PEF treatment was superior to monophase PEF treatment.

KW - microorganisms

KW - plasma applications

KW - plasma

KW - electrical pulses

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2002.804204

U2 - 10.1109/TPS.2002.804204

DO - 10.1109/TPS.2002.804204

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1525

EP - 1531

JO - IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

T2 - IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

JF - IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

SN - 0093-3813

IS - 4

ER -