Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem

Panagiotis Tsoutsanis, Ioannis Kokkinakis, László Könözsy, Dimitris Drikakis, Robin J.R. Williams, David L. Youngs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
194 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The accuracy, robustness, dissipation characteristics and efficiency of several structured and unstructured grid methods are investigated with reference to the low Mach double vortex pairing flow problem. The aim of the study is to shed light into the numerical advantages and disadvantages of different numerical discretizations, principally designed for shock-capturing, in low Mach vortical flows. The methods include structured and unstructured finite volume and Lagrange-Remap methods, with accuracy ranging from 2nd to 9th-order, with and without applying low-Mach corrections. Comparison of the schemes is presented for the vortex evolution, momentum thickness, as well as for their numerical dissipation versus the viscous and total dissipation. The study shows that the momentum thickness and large scale features of a basic vortical structure are well resolved even at the lowest grid resolution of 32×32 provided that the numerical schemes are of a high-order of accuracy or the numerical framework is sufficiently non-dissipative. The implementation of the finite volume methods in unstructured triangular meshes provides the best results even without low Mach number corrections provided that a higher-order advective discretization for the advective fluxes is employed. The compressible Lagrange-Remap framework is computationally the fastest one, although the numerical error for the momentum thickness does not reduce as fast as for other numerical schemes and computational frameworks, e.g., when higher-order schemes are utilized. It is also shown that the low-Mach number correction has a lesser effect on the results as the order of the spatial accuracy increases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-231
Number of pages25
JournalComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Volume293
Early online date6 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Mach number
Vortex flow
vortices
dissipation
momentum
Momentum
finite volume method
Finite volume method
mesh
shock
grids
Fluxes

Keywords

  • high resolution
  • high order
  • low mach
  • vortex

Cite this

Tsoutsanis, Panagiotis ; Kokkinakis, Ioannis ; Könözsy, László ; Drikakis, Dimitris ; Williams, Robin J.R. ; Youngs, David L. / Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem. In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 293. pp. 207-231.
@article{82c07e6f9e1944eba6a54344895683c5,
title = "Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem",
abstract = "The accuracy, robustness, dissipation characteristics and efficiency of several structured and unstructured grid methods are investigated with reference to the low Mach double vortex pairing flow problem. The aim of the study is to shed light into the numerical advantages and disadvantages of different numerical discretizations, principally designed for shock-capturing, in low Mach vortical flows. The methods include structured and unstructured finite volume and Lagrange-Remap methods, with accuracy ranging from 2nd to 9th-order, with and without applying low-Mach corrections. Comparison of the schemes is presented for the vortex evolution, momentum thickness, as well as for their numerical dissipation versus the viscous and total dissipation. The study shows that the momentum thickness and large scale features of a basic vortical structure are well resolved even at the lowest grid resolution of 32×32 provided that the numerical schemes are of a high-order of accuracy or the numerical framework is sufficiently non-dissipative. The implementation of the finite volume methods in unstructured triangular meshes provides the best results even without low Mach number corrections provided that a higher-order advective discretization for the advective fluxes is employed. The compressible Lagrange-Remap framework is computationally the fastest one, although the numerical error for the momentum thickness does not reduce as fast as for other numerical schemes and computational frameworks, e.g., when higher-order schemes are utilized. It is also shown that the low-Mach number correction has a lesser effect on the results as the order of the spatial accuracy increases.",
keywords = "high resolution, high order, low mach, vortex",
author = "Panagiotis Tsoutsanis and Ioannis Kokkinakis and L{\'a}szl{\'o} K{\"o}n{\"o}zsy and Dimitris Drikakis and Williams, {Robin J.R.} and Youngs, {David L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.cma.2015.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "293",
pages = "207--231",
journal = "Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics end Engineering",
issn = "0045-7825",

}

Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem. / Tsoutsanis, Panagiotis; Kokkinakis, Ioannis; Könözsy, László; Drikakis, Dimitris; Williams, Robin J.R.; Youngs, David L.

In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 293, 15.08.2015, p. 207-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem

AU - Tsoutsanis, Panagiotis

AU - Kokkinakis, Ioannis

AU - Könözsy, László

AU - Drikakis, Dimitris

AU - Williams, Robin J.R.

AU - Youngs, David L.

PY - 2015/8/15

Y1 - 2015/8/15

N2 - The accuracy, robustness, dissipation characteristics and efficiency of several structured and unstructured grid methods are investigated with reference to the low Mach double vortex pairing flow problem. The aim of the study is to shed light into the numerical advantages and disadvantages of different numerical discretizations, principally designed for shock-capturing, in low Mach vortical flows. The methods include structured and unstructured finite volume and Lagrange-Remap methods, with accuracy ranging from 2nd to 9th-order, with and without applying low-Mach corrections. Comparison of the schemes is presented for the vortex evolution, momentum thickness, as well as for their numerical dissipation versus the viscous and total dissipation. The study shows that the momentum thickness and large scale features of a basic vortical structure are well resolved even at the lowest grid resolution of 32×32 provided that the numerical schemes are of a high-order of accuracy or the numerical framework is sufficiently non-dissipative. The implementation of the finite volume methods in unstructured triangular meshes provides the best results even without low Mach number corrections provided that a higher-order advective discretization for the advective fluxes is employed. The compressible Lagrange-Remap framework is computationally the fastest one, although the numerical error for the momentum thickness does not reduce as fast as for other numerical schemes and computational frameworks, e.g., when higher-order schemes are utilized. It is also shown that the low-Mach number correction has a lesser effect on the results as the order of the spatial accuracy increases.

AB - The accuracy, robustness, dissipation characteristics and efficiency of several structured and unstructured grid methods are investigated with reference to the low Mach double vortex pairing flow problem. The aim of the study is to shed light into the numerical advantages and disadvantages of different numerical discretizations, principally designed for shock-capturing, in low Mach vortical flows. The methods include structured and unstructured finite volume and Lagrange-Remap methods, with accuracy ranging from 2nd to 9th-order, with and without applying low-Mach corrections. Comparison of the schemes is presented for the vortex evolution, momentum thickness, as well as for their numerical dissipation versus the viscous and total dissipation. The study shows that the momentum thickness and large scale features of a basic vortical structure are well resolved even at the lowest grid resolution of 32×32 provided that the numerical schemes are of a high-order of accuracy or the numerical framework is sufficiently non-dissipative. The implementation of the finite volume methods in unstructured triangular meshes provides the best results even without low Mach number corrections provided that a higher-order advective discretization for the advective fluxes is employed. The compressible Lagrange-Remap framework is computationally the fastest one, although the numerical error for the momentum thickness does not reduce as fast as for other numerical schemes and computational frameworks, e.g., when higher-order schemes are utilized. It is also shown that the low-Mach number correction has a lesser effect on the results as the order of the spatial accuracy increases.

KW - high resolution

KW - high order

KW - low mach

KW - vortex

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782515001577

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84930226566&partnerID=40&md5=509f0568cdd154b5ae978c3ad91adae3

U2 - 10.1016/j.cma.2015.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.cma.2015.04.010

M3 - Article

VL - 293

SP - 207

EP - 231

JO - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics end Engineering

JF - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics end Engineering

SN - 0045-7825

ER -