Comparison of partial discharge characteristics and degradation in several polymeric insulators

D. Adhikari, D.M. Hepburn, B.G. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Polymeric insulating materials with excellent electrical properties are widely used in electrical power equipment. These materials are degraded, however, when they are subjected to partial discharge (PD) with different polymeric materials possessing different levels of PD resistance. In this study the PD characteristics and degradation caused by PD are analysed and compared for four different polymers - poly(ether sulphone) (PES), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(propylene) (PP) and low-density poly(ethylene) (LDPE). An artificial void is created in each of the polymer samples and electrically stressed above PD inception voltage (PDIV) for 4 h. The simulated electric field distribution inside the void for each of the polymer materials at the respective PDIVs is modelled using COMSOL to validate the experimental results. Little work has correlated void PD characteristics with material degradation induced by PD across a range of different polymers and subsequently categorised them according to their PD resistances. This study therefore presents a comparative study of the N-Q patterns of PD pulses (a plot of the number of discharges against the measure of apparent charge), PD repetition rate and the chemical and morphological changes occurring on the void surfaces for each type of polymer. The results show that the PD resistance of these four polymers can be categorised in a decreasing order according to the following sequence: LDPE, PP, PET and PES with LDPE being most resistant to PD and PES the least resistant. © 2012 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
LanguageEnglish
Pages474-484
Number of pages11
JournalIET Science, Measurement and Technology
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Partial discharges
insulators
degradation
Degradation
Polymers
voids
polymers
Ethylene
ethylene
polyethylene terephthalate
Polyethylene terephthalates
polypropylene
Polypropylenes
Insulating materials
sulfones
insulation
Ethers
Electric properties
ethers
repetition

Keywords

  • electric field distributions
  • polymeric materials
  • partial discharge characteristics
  • polymeric insulators
  • material degradation

Cite this

@article{33fc85657c3c466bad67553db4df93f6,
title = "Comparison of partial discharge characteristics and degradation in several polymeric insulators",
abstract = "Polymeric insulating materials with excellent electrical properties are widely used in electrical power equipment. These materials are degraded, however, when they are subjected to partial discharge (PD) with different polymeric materials possessing different levels of PD resistance. In this study the PD characteristics and degradation caused by PD are analysed and compared for four different polymers - poly(ether sulphone) (PES), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(propylene) (PP) and low-density poly(ethylene) (LDPE). An artificial void is created in each of the polymer samples and electrically stressed above PD inception voltage (PDIV) for 4 h. The simulated electric field distribution inside the void for each of the polymer materials at the respective PDIVs is modelled using COMSOL to validate the experimental results. Little work has correlated void PD characteristics with material degradation induced by PD across a range of different polymers and subsequently categorised them according to their PD resistances. This study therefore presents a comparative study of the N-Q patterns of PD pulses (a plot of the number of discharges against the measure of apparent charge), PD repetition rate and the chemical and morphological changes occurring on the void surfaces for each type of polymer. The results show that the PD resistance of these four polymers can be categorised in a decreasing order according to the following sequence: LDPE, PP, PET and PES with LDPE being most resistant to PD and PES the least resistant. {\circledC} 2012 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.",
keywords = "electric field distributions, polymeric materials, partial discharge characteristics, polymeric insulators, material degradation",
author = "D. Adhikari and D.M. Hepburn and B.G. Stewart",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1049/iet-smt.2011.0226",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "474--484",
journal = "IET Science, Measurement and Technology",
issn = "1751-8822",
publisher = "Institution of Engineering and Technology",
number = "6",

}

Comparison of partial discharge characteristics and degradation in several polymeric insulators. / Adhikari, D.; Hepburn, D.M.; Stewart, B.G.

In: IET Science, Measurement and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 6, 26.12.2012, p. 474-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of partial discharge characteristics and degradation in several polymeric insulators

AU - Adhikari, D.

AU - Hepburn, D.M.

AU - Stewart, B.G.

PY - 2012/12/26

Y1 - 2012/12/26

N2 - Polymeric insulating materials with excellent electrical properties are widely used in electrical power equipment. These materials are degraded, however, when they are subjected to partial discharge (PD) with different polymeric materials possessing different levels of PD resistance. In this study the PD characteristics and degradation caused by PD are analysed and compared for four different polymers - poly(ether sulphone) (PES), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(propylene) (PP) and low-density poly(ethylene) (LDPE). An artificial void is created in each of the polymer samples and electrically stressed above PD inception voltage (PDIV) for 4 h. The simulated electric field distribution inside the void for each of the polymer materials at the respective PDIVs is modelled using COMSOL to validate the experimental results. Little work has correlated void PD characteristics with material degradation induced by PD across a range of different polymers and subsequently categorised them according to their PD resistances. This study therefore presents a comparative study of the N-Q patterns of PD pulses (a plot of the number of discharges against the measure of apparent charge), PD repetition rate and the chemical and morphological changes occurring on the void surfaces for each type of polymer. The results show that the PD resistance of these four polymers can be categorised in a decreasing order according to the following sequence: LDPE, PP, PET and PES with LDPE being most resistant to PD and PES the least resistant. © 2012 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

AB - Polymeric insulating materials with excellent electrical properties are widely used in electrical power equipment. These materials are degraded, however, when they are subjected to partial discharge (PD) with different polymeric materials possessing different levels of PD resistance. In this study the PD characteristics and degradation caused by PD are analysed and compared for four different polymers - poly(ether sulphone) (PES), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(propylene) (PP) and low-density poly(ethylene) (LDPE). An artificial void is created in each of the polymer samples and electrically stressed above PD inception voltage (PDIV) for 4 h. The simulated electric field distribution inside the void for each of the polymer materials at the respective PDIVs is modelled using COMSOL to validate the experimental results. Little work has correlated void PD characteristics with material degradation induced by PD across a range of different polymers and subsequently categorised them according to their PD resistances. This study therefore presents a comparative study of the N-Q patterns of PD pulses (a plot of the number of discharges against the measure of apparent charge), PD repetition rate and the chemical and morphological changes occurring on the void surfaces for each type of polymer. The results show that the PD resistance of these four polymers can be categorised in a decreasing order according to the following sequence: LDPE, PP, PET and PES with LDPE being most resistant to PD and PES the least resistant. © 2012 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

KW - electric field distributions

KW - polymeric materials

KW - partial discharge characteristics

KW - polymeric insulators

KW - material degradation

UR - http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4105888

U2 - 10.1049/iet-smt.2011.0226

DO - 10.1049/iet-smt.2011.0226

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 474

EP - 484

JO - IET Science, Measurement and Technology

T2 - IET Science, Measurement and Technology

JF - IET Science, Measurement and Technology

SN - 1751-8822

IS - 6

ER -