Comparison of linear and nonlinear kriging methods for characterization and interpolation of soil data

Eric Asa, Mohamed Saafi, Joseph Membah, Arun Billa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Characterization and analysis of large quantities of existing soil data represent highly complicated tasks due to the spatial correlation, uncertainty and complexity of the processes underlying soil formation. In this work, three linear kriging (simple kriging, ordinary kriging and universal kriging) and three nonlinear kriging (indicator kriging, probability kriging and disjunctive kriging) algorithms are compared to discover which is best suited for the characterization and interpolation of soil data for applications in transportation projects. A spherical model is employed as the experimental variogram to aid the spatial interpolation and cross-validation.
The kriged data is subjected to leave-one-out cross-validation. The data used are in both vector and raster format. Statistical measures of correctness (mean prediction error, root-mean-square error, standardized root-mean-square error, average standard error) from the cross-validation are used to compare the kriging algorithms. Using indicator and probability kriging with the vector data set yielded the best results.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date31 Mar 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Interpolation
Soils
Mean square error
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • soil data
  • spatial correlation
  • Kriging
  • raster
  • vector
  • variogram
  • cross-validation
  • spherical
  • probability kriging
  • disjunctive kriging

Cite this

@article{155862e3be334f9d9233bcd102b36010,
title = "Comparison of linear and nonlinear kriging methods for characterization and interpolation of soil data",
abstract = "Characterization and analysis of large quantities of existing soil data represent highly complicated tasks due to the spatial correlation, uncertainty and complexity of the processes underlying soil formation. In this work, three linear kriging (simple kriging, ordinary kriging and universal kriging) and three nonlinear kriging (indicator kriging, probability kriging and disjunctive kriging) algorithms are compared to discover which is best suited for the characterization and interpolation of soil data for applications in transportation projects. A spherical model is employed as the experimental variogram to aid the spatial interpolation and cross-validation. The kriged data is subjected to leave-one-out cross-validation. The data used are in both vector and raster format. Statistical measures of correctness (mean prediction error, root-mean-square error, standardized root-mean-square error, average standard error) from the cross-validation are used to compare the kriging algorithms. Using indicator and probability kriging with the vector data set yielded the best results.",
keywords = "soil data , spatial correlation, Kriging, raster, vector, variogram, cross-validation, spherical, probability kriging , disjunctive kriging",
author = "Eric Asa and Mohamed Saafi and Joseph Membah and Arun Billa",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000118",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering",
issn = "0887-3801",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of linear and nonlinear kriging methods for characterization and interpolation of soil data. / Asa, Eric; Saafi, Mohamed; Membah, Joseph; Billa, Arun.

In: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of linear and nonlinear kriging methods for characterization and interpolation of soil data

AU - Asa, Eric

AU - Saafi, Mohamed

AU - Membah, Joseph

AU - Billa, Arun

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Characterization and analysis of large quantities of existing soil data represent highly complicated tasks due to the spatial correlation, uncertainty and complexity of the processes underlying soil formation. In this work, three linear kriging (simple kriging, ordinary kriging and universal kriging) and three nonlinear kriging (indicator kriging, probability kriging and disjunctive kriging) algorithms are compared to discover which is best suited for the characterization and interpolation of soil data for applications in transportation projects. A spherical model is employed as the experimental variogram to aid the spatial interpolation and cross-validation. The kriged data is subjected to leave-one-out cross-validation. The data used are in both vector and raster format. Statistical measures of correctness (mean prediction error, root-mean-square error, standardized root-mean-square error, average standard error) from the cross-validation are used to compare the kriging algorithms. Using indicator and probability kriging with the vector data set yielded the best results.

AB - Characterization and analysis of large quantities of existing soil data represent highly complicated tasks due to the spatial correlation, uncertainty and complexity of the processes underlying soil formation. In this work, three linear kriging (simple kriging, ordinary kriging and universal kriging) and three nonlinear kriging (indicator kriging, probability kriging and disjunctive kriging) algorithms are compared to discover which is best suited for the characterization and interpolation of soil data for applications in transportation projects. A spherical model is employed as the experimental variogram to aid the spatial interpolation and cross-validation. The kriged data is subjected to leave-one-out cross-validation. The data used are in both vector and raster format. Statistical measures of correctness (mean prediction error, root-mean-square error, standardized root-mean-square error, average standard error) from the cross-validation are used to compare the kriging algorithms. Using indicator and probability kriging with the vector data set yielded the best results.

KW - soil data

KW - spatial correlation

KW - Kriging

KW - raster

KW - vector

KW - variogram

KW - cross-validation

KW - spherical

KW - probability kriging

KW - disjunctive kriging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860197658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000118

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000118

M3 - Article

VL - 26

JO - Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

T2 - Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

JF - Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

SN - 0887-3801

IS - 1

ER -