Comparison between different design approaches to prevent buckling of torispherical heads under internal pressure

Martin Muscat, Duncan Camilleri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Under the action of internal pressure compressive circumferential stresses develop in the knuckle region of torispherical heads making them susceptible to buckling. Current pressure vessel design codes such as the European Unfired pressure vessel code MSA EN13445 Part 3 present buckling as a failure mode that needs to be prevented. The latest version of the code has a Design by Analysis route that requires the designer to perform a buckling check on the design model. This study considers the different design approaches (Design by Analysis and Design by Rule) presented in MSA EN13445 Part 3 and compares
computational results with experimental data available from literature. The study shows that the pressure vessel design code MSA EN13445 Part 3 guarantees that the calculated design load will not subject torispherical heads to buckling in the knuckle region, under the action of internal pressure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-66
JournalInternational Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
Volume108-109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Event13th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology (ICPVT-13) - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 20 May 201223 May 2012

Keywords

  • torispherical head
  • design by analysis
  • design by rule
  • buckling

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between different design approaches to prevent buckling of torispherical heads under internal pressure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this