Comparing machine learning clustering with latent class analysis on cancer symptoms' data

Nikolaos Papachristou, Christine Miaskowski, Payam Barnaghi, Roma Maguire, Nazli Farajidavar, Bruce Cooper, Xiao Hu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

3 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Symptom Cluster Research is a major topic in Cancer Symptom Science. In spite of the several statistical and clinical approaches in this domain, there is not a consensus on which method performs better. Identifying a generally accepted analytical method is important in order to be able to utilize and process all the available data. In this paper we report a secondary analysis on cancer symptom data, comparing the performance of five Machine Learning (ML) clustering algorithms in doing so. Based on how well they separate specific subsets of symptom measurements we select the best of them and proceed to compare its performance with the Latent Class Analysis (LCA) method. This analysis is a part of an ongoing study for identifying suitable Machine Learning algorithms to analyse and predict cancer symptoms in cancer treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHealthcare Innovation Point-Of-Care Technologies Conference (HI-POCT), 2016 IEEE
Place of PublicationPiscataway, NJ.
PublisherIEEE
Pages162-166
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)9781509011674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Symptom Cluster Research
  • machine learning
  • cancer symptom science
  • learning algorithms
  • cancer treatment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing machine learning clustering with latent class analysis on cancer symptoms' data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Papachristou, N., Miaskowski, C., Barnaghi, P., Maguire, R., Farajidavar, N., Cooper, B., & Hu, X. (2016). Comparing machine learning clustering with latent class analysis on cancer symptoms' data. In Healthcare Innovation Point-Of-Care Technologies Conference (HI-POCT), 2016 IEEE (pp. 162-166). [16560390] Piscataway, NJ.: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HIC.2016.7797722