Comparing and contrasting travelling wave behaviour for groundwater flow and foam drainage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Liquid drainage within foam is generally described by the foam drainage equation which admits travelling wave solutions. Meanwhile, Richards’ equation has been used to describe liquid flow in unsaturated soil. Travelling wave solutions for Richards equation are also available using soil material property functions which have been developed by Van Genuchten. In order to compare and contrast these solutions, the travelling waves are expressed as dimensionless height, ξ^ , versus moisture content, Θ. For low moisture content, ξ^ exhibits an abrupt change away from the dry state in Richards equation compared to a much more gradual change in foam drainage. When moisture content nears saturation, ξ^ reaches large values (i.e. ξ^ ≫ 1) for both Richards equation and foam drainage, implying a gradual approach of Θ towards the saturated state. The ξ^ values in Richards equation tend, however, to be larger than those in the foam drainage equation, implying an even more gradual approach towards saturation. The reasons for the difference between foam drainage and Richards equation solutions are traced back to soil material properties and in particular a soil specific parameter “m” which is determined from the soil-water retention curve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-280
Number of pages26
JournalTransport in Porous Media
Volume137
Issue number1
Early online date18 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Richards equation
  • foam drainage
  • groundwater flow
  • unsaturated flow
  • travelling wave

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing and contrasting travelling wave behaviour for groundwater flow and foam drainage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this