TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study of dynamic characteristics between a FHAWT and a helical type FVAWT
AU - Deng, Wanru
AU - Liu, Liqin
AU - Lin, Zihe
AU - Yuan, Zhiming
AU - Li, Yan
AU - Liu, Dongsheng
AU - Li, Haoran
AU - Guo, Ying
PY - 2024/8/14
Y1 - 2024/8/14
N2 - Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are a growing area of interest, with significant ongoing research work and commercial development. There are two types of FOWT, namely floating horizontal axis wind turbine (FHAWT) and floating vertical axis wind turbine (FVAWT). It has been a long-standing debate on which type of FOWT has better technical and economic performance. However, the research work on comparative study of these two types of FOWT is very rare. In this study, we aim to systematically evaluate the performance of FHAWT and FVAWT, with particular focus on comparing their dynamic characteristics by using coupled numerical models. Tank testing for these two types of FOWT was conducted at the wave basin, and a series of code-to-experiment comparisons were carried out to validate the numerical models. Afterwards, dynamic characteristics, including the control strategy, aerodynamic power, floater motions, tower base bending moments, and blade deformations, are compared between the FHAWT and helical type FVAWT. Results show that the FHAWT presents better performance on the aerodynamic performance and tower base bending moments, while the helical type FVAWT has the advantage of minimal blade deformations.
AB - Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are a growing area of interest, with significant ongoing research work and commercial development. There are two types of FOWT, namely floating horizontal axis wind turbine (FHAWT) and floating vertical axis wind turbine (FVAWT). It has been a long-standing debate on which type of FOWT has better technical and economic performance. However, the research work on comparative study of these two types of FOWT is very rare. In this study, we aim to systematically evaluate the performance of FHAWT and FVAWT, with particular focus on comparing their dynamic characteristics by using coupled numerical models. Tank testing for these two types of FOWT was conducted at the wave basin, and a series of code-to-experiment comparisons were carried out to validate the numerical models. Afterwards, dynamic characteristics, including the control strategy, aerodynamic power, floater motions, tower base bending moments, and blade deformations, are compared between the FHAWT and helical type FVAWT. Results show that the FHAWT presents better performance on the aerodynamic performance and tower base bending moments, while the helical type FVAWT has the advantage of minimal blade deformations.
KW - floating wind turbines
KW - horizontal axis wind turbine
KW - helical type wind turbine
KW - comparative study
KW - dynamic analysis
UR - https://doi.org/10.17868/strath.00090332
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201295637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118981
DO - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118981
M3 - Article
SN - 0029-8018
VL - 311
JO - Ocean Engineering
JF - Ocean Engineering
IS - Pt. 2
M1 - 118981
ER -