'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Elisabeta Dano, Florian Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an economically inactive European Union (EU) citizen who does not have sufficient resources to support herself and therefore does not fulfil the requirements set out in article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38 for legal residence, was not entitled to equal treatment with nationals of the host Member State. As a result, such citizens could be denied access to non-contributory social benefits. In determining whether individuals have sufficient resources to support themselves, national authorities must take individual circumstances into account. The CJEU justified its decision by recognising that Member States must be allowed to prevent Union citizens from becoming ‘a burden on the social assistance system’ of the host State.
LanguageEnglish
Pages573-585
Number of pages13
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume44
Issue number4
Early online date27 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

social benefits
court of justice
threat
citizen
equal treatment
social assistance
resources

Keywords

  • court of justice
  • EU integration
  • European Union

Cite this

@article{b4e9b55846544a219ca3448626920c35,
title = "'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits",
abstract = "In Elisabeta Dano, Florian Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an economically inactive European Union (EU) citizen who does not have sufficient resources to support herself and therefore does not fulfil the requirements set out in article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38 for legal residence, was not entitled to equal treatment with nationals of the host Member State. As a result, such citizens could be denied access to non-contributory social benefits. In determining whether individuals have sufficient resources to support themselves, national authorities must take individual circumstances into account. The CJEU justified its decision by recognising that Member States must be allowed to prevent Union citizens from becoming ‘a burden on the social assistance system’ of the host State.",
keywords = "court of justice, EU integration, European Union",
author = "Rebecca Zahn",
note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Industrial Law Journal following peer review. The version of recordZahn, R. (2015). 'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits. Industrial Law Journal is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwv031",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/indlaw/dwv031",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "573--585",
journal = "Industrial Law Journal",
issn = "0305-9332",
number = "4",

}

'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits. / Zahn, Rebecca.

In: Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 573-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits

AU - Zahn, Rebecca

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Industrial Law Journal following peer review. The version of recordZahn, R. (2015). 'Common sense' or a threat to EU integration? The court, economically inactive EU citizens and social benefits. Industrial Law Journal is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwv031

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - In Elisabeta Dano, Florian Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an economically inactive European Union (EU) citizen who does not have sufficient resources to support herself and therefore does not fulfil the requirements set out in article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38 for legal residence, was not entitled to equal treatment with nationals of the host Member State. As a result, such citizens could be denied access to non-contributory social benefits. In determining whether individuals have sufficient resources to support themselves, national authorities must take individual circumstances into account. The CJEU justified its decision by recognising that Member States must be allowed to prevent Union citizens from becoming ‘a burden on the social assistance system’ of the host State.

AB - In Elisabeta Dano, Florian Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an economically inactive European Union (EU) citizen who does not have sufficient resources to support herself and therefore does not fulfil the requirements set out in article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38 for legal residence, was not entitled to equal treatment with nationals of the host Member State. As a result, such citizens could be denied access to non-contributory social benefits. In determining whether individuals have sufficient resources to support themselves, national authorities must take individual circumstances into account. The CJEU justified its decision by recognising that Member States must be allowed to prevent Union citizens from becoming ‘a burden on the social assistance system’ of the host State.

KW - court of justice

KW - EU integration

KW - European Union

UR - http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/content/by/year

U2 - 10.1093/indlaw/dwv031

DO - 10.1093/indlaw/dwv031

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 573

EP - 585

JO - Industrial Law Journal

T2 - Industrial Law Journal

JF - Industrial Law Journal

SN - 0305-9332

IS - 4

ER -