Comment on "Influence of focal mechanism in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis" by Vincenzo Convertito and André Herrero

F. O. Strasser, V. Montaldo, J. Douglas, J. J. Bommer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of style-of-faulting on strong ground motions has been the subject of debate for some time. Although some controversy persists, the general consensus is that ground motions produced by reverse faults are higher than those produced by normal faults, whereas motions from strike-slip faults are somewhere in between. In a recent article, Convertito and Herrero (2004) derived a correction factor for focal mechanism to be applied to predictive equations. This issue was previously addressed by Bommer et al. (2003). Although this article is cited by Convertito and Herrero, it seems that its aims and scope were not well understood, and we would therefore like to clarify what the method presented therein entails, especially because we feel that Convertito and Herrero's approach of characterizing focal mechanisms based solely on the radiation pattern is difficult to justify.
LanguageEnglish
Pages750-753
Number of pages4
JournalBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Strike-slip faults
Faulting
focal mechanism
seismic hazard
ground motion
hazards
Hazards
reverse fault
strike-slip fault
normal fault
faulting
slip
radiation
analysis

Keywords

  • ground motion prediction
  • seizmic hazards
  • ground-motion estimation equations

Cite this

@article{e4cd030afadf46398e549b687b68c075,
title = "Comment on {"}Influence of focal mechanism in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis{"} by Vincenzo Convertito and Andr{\'e} Herrero",
abstract = "The influence of style-of-faulting on strong ground motions has been the subject of debate for some time. Although some controversy persists, the general consensus is that ground motions produced by reverse faults are higher than those produced by normal faults, whereas motions from strike-slip faults are somewhere in between. In a recent article, Convertito and Herrero (2004) derived a correction factor for focal mechanism to be applied to predictive equations. This issue was previously addressed by Bommer et al. (2003). Although this article is cited by Convertito and Herrero, it seems that its aims and scope were not well understood, and we would therefore like to clarify what the method presented therein entails, especially because we feel that Convertito and Herrero's approach of characterizing focal mechanisms based solely on the radiation pattern is difficult to justify.",
keywords = "ground motion prediction, seizmic hazards, ground-motion estimation equations",
author = "Strasser, {F. O.} and V. Montaldo and J. Douglas and Bommer, {J. J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1785/0120050101",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "750--753",
journal = "Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America",
issn = "0037-1106",
number = "2",

}

Comment on "Influence of focal mechanism in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis" by Vincenzo Convertito and André Herrero. / Strasser, F. O.; Montaldo, V.; Douglas, J.; Bommer, J. J.

In: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 96, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 750-753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on "Influence of focal mechanism in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis" by Vincenzo Convertito and André Herrero

AU - Strasser, F. O.

AU - Montaldo, V.

AU - Douglas, J.

AU - Bommer, J. J.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - The influence of style-of-faulting on strong ground motions has been the subject of debate for some time. Although some controversy persists, the general consensus is that ground motions produced by reverse faults are higher than those produced by normal faults, whereas motions from strike-slip faults are somewhere in between. In a recent article, Convertito and Herrero (2004) derived a correction factor for focal mechanism to be applied to predictive equations. This issue was previously addressed by Bommer et al. (2003). Although this article is cited by Convertito and Herrero, it seems that its aims and scope were not well understood, and we would therefore like to clarify what the method presented therein entails, especially because we feel that Convertito and Herrero's approach of characterizing focal mechanisms based solely on the radiation pattern is difficult to justify.

AB - The influence of style-of-faulting on strong ground motions has been the subject of debate for some time. Although some controversy persists, the general consensus is that ground motions produced by reverse faults are higher than those produced by normal faults, whereas motions from strike-slip faults are somewhere in between. In a recent article, Convertito and Herrero (2004) derived a correction factor for focal mechanism to be applied to predictive equations. This issue was previously addressed by Bommer et al. (2003). Although this article is cited by Convertito and Herrero, it seems that its aims and scope were not well understood, and we would therefore like to clarify what the method presented therein entails, especially because we feel that Convertito and Herrero's approach of characterizing focal mechanisms based solely on the radiation pattern is difficult to justify.

KW - ground motion prediction

KW - seizmic hazards

KW - ground-motion estimation equations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645798032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1785/0120050101

DO - 10.1785/0120050101

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 750

EP - 753

JO - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

T2 - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

JF - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

SN - 0037-1106

IS - 2

ER -