Combining and selecting characteristics of information use

I. Ruthven, M. Lalmas, C.J. van Rijsbergen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we report on a series of experiments designed to investigate the combination of term and document weighting functions in Information Retrieval. We describe a series of weighting functions, each of which is based on how information is used within documents and collections, and use these weighting functions in two types of experiments: one based on combination of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, the other based on selective combination of evidence within a relevance feedback situation. We discuss the difficulties involved in predicting good combinations of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, and suggest the factors that may lead to the success or failure of combination. We also demonstrate how, in a relevance feedback situation, the relevance assessments can provide a good indication of how evidence should be selected for query term weighting. The use of relevance information to guide the combination process is shown to reduce the variability inherent in combination of evidence.
LanguageEnglish
Pages378-396
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume53
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Information use
Feedback
Information retrieval
Experiments

Cite this

@article{8912720f7f9040a48ee6fef37e75cc8e,
title = "Combining and selecting characteristics of information use",
abstract = "In this paper we report on a series of experiments designed to investigate the combination of term and document weighting functions in Information Retrieval. We describe a series of weighting functions, each of which is based on how information is used within documents and collections, and use these weighting functions in two types of experiments: one based on combination of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, the other based on selective combination of evidence within a relevance feedback situation. We discuss the difficulties involved in predicting good combinations of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, and suggest the factors that may lead to the success or failure of combination. We also demonstrate how, in a relevance feedback situation, the relevance assessments can provide a good indication of how evidence should be selected for query term weighting. The use of relevance information to guide the combination process is shown to reduce the variability inherent in combination of evidence.",
author = "I. Ruthven and M. Lalmas and {van Rijsbergen}, C.J.",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "378--396",
journal = "Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology",
issn = "1532-2890",
number = "5",

}

Combining and selecting characteristics of information use. / Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.; van Rijsbergen, C.J.

In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2002, p. 378-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining and selecting characteristics of information use

AU - Ruthven, I.

AU - Lalmas, M.

AU - van Rijsbergen, C.J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - In this paper we report on a series of experiments designed to investigate the combination of term and document weighting functions in Information Retrieval. We describe a series of weighting functions, each of which is based on how information is used within documents and collections, and use these weighting functions in two types of experiments: one based on combination of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, the other based on selective combination of evidence within a relevance feedback situation. We discuss the difficulties involved in predicting good combinations of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, and suggest the factors that may lead to the success or failure of combination. We also demonstrate how, in a relevance feedback situation, the relevance assessments can provide a good indication of how evidence should be selected for query term weighting. The use of relevance information to guide the combination process is shown to reduce the variability inherent in combination of evidence.

AB - In this paper we report on a series of experiments designed to investigate the combination of term and document weighting functions in Information Retrieval. We describe a series of weighting functions, each of which is based on how information is used within documents and collections, and use these weighting functions in two types of experiments: one based on combination of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, the other based on selective combination of evidence within a relevance feedback situation. We discuss the difficulties involved in predicting good combinations of evidence for ad-hoc retrieval, and suggest the factors that may lead to the success or failure of combination. We also demonstrate how, in a relevance feedback situation, the relevance assessments can provide a good indication of how evidence should be selected for query term weighting. The use of relevance information to guide the combination process is shown to reduce the variability inherent in combination of evidence.

UR - http://www.asis.org/Publications/JASIS/vol53n05.html

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 378

EP - 396

JO - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

T2 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

JF - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

SN - 1532-2890

IS - 5

ER -