Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland

Stephen Elstub, Mhairi Aitken, Oliver Escobar, Andrew Thompson, Jennifer Roberts

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Mini-publics are the most lauded device for institutionalising deliberative democracy, and citizens’ juries have been the most used type. They are seen as an opportunity for citizens to deliberate on important and contentious issues, and to revise their preferences in light of deliberation. This paper analyses three Citizens’ juries conducted in different locations in Scotland on the contested topic of onshore wind farms. The locations were selected according to proximity to windfarms, and the three juries were held successively from September 2013 to February 2014. Although part of a research project, the citizens’ juries were nonetheless designed to inform Scottish policy debate about both wind farm development and public involvement in decision making on this topic. Over two days, the jurors addressed, together, the following question: ‘What should be the key principles for deciding about wind farm development, and why?’ Accordingly, the jurors were invited to engage with long-term considerations regarding policy, energy generation and climate change. Using findings from mixed methods research, this paper reflects on the extent to which the citizens’ juries were ‘thinking about the future’, and the potential of democratic innovations to counter short-term thinking in policy and decision-making.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages46
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014
EventECPR annual meeting - Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 3 Sep 2014 → …

Conference

ConferenceECPR annual meeting
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period3/09/14 → …

Fingerprint

Onshore wind farms
Decision making
Energy policy
Climate change
Innovation

Keywords

  • democracy
  • wind farms
  • policy making
  • wind farm development

Cite this

Elstub, S., Aitken, M., Escobar, O., Thompson, A., & Roberts, J. (2014). Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland. Paper presented at ECPR annual meeting, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Elstub, Stephen ; Aitken, Mhairi ; Escobar, Oliver ; Thompson, Andrew ; Roberts, Jennifer. / Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland. Paper presented at ECPR annual meeting, Glasgow, United Kingdom.46 p.
@conference{1dcd694b4aad49ab9617c8cbaf930f28,
title = "Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland",
abstract = "Mini-publics are the most lauded device for institutionalising deliberative democracy, and citizens’ juries have been the most used type. They are seen as an opportunity for citizens to deliberate on important and contentious issues, and to revise their preferences in light of deliberation. This paper analyses three Citizens’ juries conducted in different locations in Scotland on the contested topic of onshore wind farms. The locations were selected according to proximity to windfarms, and the three juries were held successively from September 2013 to February 2014. Although part of a research project, the citizens’ juries were nonetheless designed to inform Scottish policy debate about both wind farm development and public involvement in decision making on this topic. Over two days, the jurors addressed, together, the following question: ‘What should be the key principles for deciding about wind farm development, and why?’ Accordingly, the jurors were invited to engage with long-term considerations regarding policy, energy generation and climate change. Using findings from mixed methods research, this paper reflects on the extent to which the citizens’ juries were ‘thinking about the future’, and the potential of democratic innovations to counter short-term thinking in policy and decision-making.",
keywords = "democracy, wind farms, policy making, wind farm development",
author = "Stephen Elstub and Mhairi Aitken and Oliver Escobar and Andrew Thompson and Jennifer Roberts",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
language = "English",
note = "ECPR annual meeting ; Conference date: 03-09-2014",

}

Elstub, S, Aitken, M, Escobar, O, Thompson, A & Roberts, J 2014, 'Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland' Paper presented at ECPR annual meeting, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3/09/14, .

Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland. / Elstub, Stephen; Aitken, Mhairi; Escobar, Oliver; Thompson, Andrew; Roberts, Jennifer.

2014. Paper presented at ECPR annual meeting, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland

AU - Elstub, Stephen

AU - Aitken, Mhairi

AU - Escobar, Oliver

AU - Thompson, Andrew

AU - Roberts, Jennifer

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Mini-publics are the most lauded device for institutionalising deliberative democracy, and citizens’ juries have been the most used type. They are seen as an opportunity for citizens to deliberate on important and contentious issues, and to revise their preferences in light of deliberation. This paper analyses three Citizens’ juries conducted in different locations in Scotland on the contested topic of onshore wind farms. The locations were selected according to proximity to windfarms, and the three juries were held successively from September 2013 to February 2014. Although part of a research project, the citizens’ juries were nonetheless designed to inform Scottish policy debate about both wind farm development and public involvement in decision making on this topic. Over two days, the jurors addressed, together, the following question: ‘What should be the key principles for deciding about wind farm development, and why?’ Accordingly, the jurors were invited to engage with long-term considerations regarding policy, energy generation and climate change. Using findings from mixed methods research, this paper reflects on the extent to which the citizens’ juries were ‘thinking about the future’, and the potential of democratic innovations to counter short-term thinking in policy and decision-making.

AB - Mini-publics are the most lauded device for institutionalising deliberative democracy, and citizens’ juries have been the most used type. They are seen as an opportunity for citizens to deliberate on important and contentious issues, and to revise their preferences in light of deliberation. This paper analyses three Citizens’ juries conducted in different locations in Scotland on the contested topic of onshore wind farms. The locations were selected according to proximity to windfarms, and the three juries were held successively from September 2013 to February 2014. Although part of a research project, the citizens’ juries were nonetheless designed to inform Scottish policy debate about both wind farm development and public involvement in decision making on this topic. Over two days, the jurors addressed, together, the following question: ‘What should be the key principles for deciding about wind farm development, and why?’ Accordingly, the jurors were invited to engage with long-term considerations regarding policy, energy generation and climate change. Using findings from mixed methods research, this paper reflects on the extent to which the citizens’ juries were ‘thinking about the future’, and the potential of democratic innovations to counter short-term thinking in policy and decision-making.

KW - democracy

KW - wind farms

KW - policy making

KW - wind farm development

UR - http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/39504656-c1cb-453a-abda-2a16327051cd.pdf

UR - http://ecpr.eu/events/eventdetails.aspx?EventID=14

UR - http://ecpr.eu/Publications/ConferenceProgrammes.aspx

M3 - Paper

ER -

Elstub S, Aitken M, Escobar O, Thompson A, Roberts J. Collective thinking about the future? A study of three citizens’ juries on wind farms in Scotland. 2014. Paper presented at ECPR annual meeting, Glasgow, United Kingdom.