Collective citizenship

from citizenship and mental health to citizenship and solidarity

Neil Quinn, Billy Bromage, Michael Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographicparticipant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Early online date6 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

mental health
citizenship
solidarity
inclusion
social participation
social inclusion
marginalization
political philosophy
empowerment
social change
Group
citizen
participation
human being

Keywords

  • citizenship
  • mental health
  • collective

Cite this

@article{e0110fa4ad2845579449cf925baa07f4,
title = "Collective citizenship: from citizenship and mental health to citizenship and solidarity",
abstract = "Although the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographicparticipant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.",
keywords = "citizenship, mental health, collective",
author = "Neil Quinn and Billy Bromage and Michael Rowe",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12551",
language = "English",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",

}

Collective citizenship : from citizenship and mental health to citizenship and solidarity. / Quinn, Neil; Bromage, Billy ; Rowe, Michael.

In: Social Policy and Administration, 06.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective citizenship

T2 - from citizenship and mental health to citizenship and solidarity

AU - Quinn, Neil

AU - Bromage, Billy

AU - Rowe, Michael

PY - 2019/11/6

Y1 - 2019/11/6

N2 - Although the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographicparticipant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.

AB - Although the concept of citizenship is a widely used theoretical framework within political philosophy, its use in the field of mental health remains underexplored. Within this context, citizenship emphasises the social inclusion and participation of people who are marginalized and offers a more social and relational view of services and support for people with mental health problems than has been common in mental health systems of care. At the same time, however, the citizenship approach has operated in the context of systems of care in the United States that favour highly individualized conceptions of, and approaches to, care, and these systems of care operate in the social and political context of highly individualized concepts of the citizen. In this article building on the work of other citizenship scholars, we argue that a collective form of citizenship, grounded in the 5Rs framework, holds the individual and collective in creative tension. Furthermore, the paper applies this model to the domain of mental health, where people are treated in individualistic ways and experience marginalisation, making the collective dimension imperative and promoting participation, empowerment and the contribution for social change to people with mental health problems. Our theoretical framework of collective citizenship, while geared toward the needs of persons with mental health problems, also contributes to recent citizenship theory on the inclusion of marginalized, stigmatised, and excluded groups. We illustrate the application of this approach through an ethnographicparticipant observation case study of a collective citizenship group with which we are associated.

KW - citizenship

KW - mental health

KW - collective

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12551

DO - 10.1111/spol.12551

M3 - Article

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

ER -