Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE

Marina Segura, Concepción Maroto, Valerie Belton, Concepción Ginestar, Inmaculada Marqués

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Management of protected areas has been focusing on conservation and recreation. Nevertheless, current governance trends include other ecosystem services from social and economic perspectives by involving stakeholders. The objectives of this chapter are to select and prioritize projects, as well as to develop new indicators based on the main functions of ecosystems to classify the territory inside protected areas. Both purposes take into account the provided ecosystem services and the stakeholders’ preferences in order to implement a collaborative decision making tool in a forest Natural Park.

When applying AHP in order to elicit people’s preferences, it is important to have a graphic tool, which allows answering pair comparisons easily, obtaining the inconsistency index online and facilitating the revision of their answers. This case study provides a friendly implementation with macros in Excel, which enables the users to elicit and then revise their judgments if their inconsistency index is not acceptable, increasing by a lot the percentage of consistent surveys. The Excel application aggregates judgments from a group of people by the geometric mean in order to derive priorities for collaborative management. Although PROMETHEE is applied by using D-Sight software, we provide its implementation in Excel for illustrative purposes. This outranking approach enables us to select and prioritize projects and generates indicators to classify areas of the territory according to their main ecosystem services. These indicators are shown in graphs, which are simple to understand, providing relevant information for collaborative management of Natural Parks.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationMultiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding
EditorsSandra Huber, Martin Josef Geiger, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherSpringer
Pages231-255
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)9783319993034, 9783319993041
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2019

Publication series

NameInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Science
Volume274
ISSN (Print)0884-8289

Fingerprint

Collaborative management
Excel
Ecosystem services
Inconsistency
Protected areas
Stakeholders
Economics
Governance
Collaborative decision making
Geometric mean
Ecosystem
Software
Recreation
Conservation
Graph

Keywords

  • ecosystem management
  • natural parks
  • collaborative decision making tool

Cite this

Segura, M., Maroto, C., Belton, V., Ginestar, C., & Marqués, I. (2019). Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE. In S. Huber, M. J. Geiger, & A. T. de Almeida (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding (pp. 231-255). (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science; Vol. 274). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8
Segura, Marina ; Maroto, Concepción ; Belton, Valerie ; Ginestar, Concepción ; Marqués, Inmaculada . / Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE. Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding. editor / Sandra Huber ; Martin Josef Geiger ; Adiel Teixeira de Almeida. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2019. pp. 231-255 (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science).
@inbook{bfe8729536634d98b611065d72a75161,
title = "Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE",
abstract = "Management of protected areas has been focusing on conservation and recreation. Nevertheless, current governance trends include other ecosystem services from social and economic perspectives by involving stakeholders. The objectives of this chapter are to select and prioritize projects, as well as to develop new indicators based on the main functions of ecosystems to classify the territory inside protected areas. Both purposes take into account the provided ecosystem services and the stakeholders’ preferences in order to implement a collaborative decision making tool in a forest Natural Park.When applying AHP in order to elicit people’s preferences, it is important to have a graphic tool, which allows answering pair comparisons easily, obtaining the inconsistency index online and facilitating the revision of their answers. This case study provides a friendly implementation with macros in Excel, which enables the users to elicit and then revise their judgments if their inconsistency index is not acceptable, increasing by a lot the percentage of consistent surveys. The Excel application aggregates judgments from a group of people by the geometric mean in order to derive priorities for collaborative management. Although PROMETHEE is applied by using D-Sight software, we provide its implementation in Excel for illustrative purposes. This outranking approach enables us to select and prioritize projects and generates indicators to classify areas of the territory according to their main ecosystem services. These indicators are shown in graphs, which are simple to understand, providing relevant information for collaborative management of Natural Parks.",
keywords = "ecosystem management, natural parks, collaborative decision making tool",
author = "Marina Segura and Concepci{\'o}n Maroto and Valerie Belton and Concepci{\'o}n Ginestar and Inmaculada Marqu{\'e}s",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319993034",
series = "International Series in Operations Research and Management Science",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "231--255",
editor = "Sandra Huber and Geiger, {Martin Josef} and {de Almeida}, {Adiel Teixeira}",
booktitle = "Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding",

}

Segura, M, Maroto, C, Belton, V, Ginestar, C & Marqués, I 2019, Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE. in S Huber, MJ Geiger & AT de Almeida (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 274, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8

Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE. / Segura, Marina; Maroto, Concepción ; Belton, Valerie; Ginestar, Concepción ; Marqués, Inmaculada .

Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding. ed. / Sandra Huber; Martin Josef Geiger; Adiel Teixeira de Almeida. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2019. p. 231-255 (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science; Vol. 274).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE

AU - Segura, Marina

AU - Maroto, Concepción

AU - Belton, Valerie

AU - Ginestar, Concepción

AU - Marqués, Inmaculada

PY - 2019/2/9

Y1 - 2019/2/9

N2 - Management of protected areas has been focusing on conservation and recreation. Nevertheless, current governance trends include other ecosystem services from social and economic perspectives by involving stakeholders. The objectives of this chapter are to select and prioritize projects, as well as to develop new indicators based on the main functions of ecosystems to classify the territory inside protected areas. Both purposes take into account the provided ecosystem services and the stakeholders’ preferences in order to implement a collaborative decision making tool in a forest Natural Park.When applying AHP in order to elicit people’s preferences, it is important to have a graphic tool, which allows answering pair comparisons easily, obtaining the inconsistency index online and facilitating the revision of their answers. This case study provides a friendly implementation with macros in Excel, which enables the users to elicit and then revise their judgments if their inconsistency index is not acceptable, increasing by a lot the percentage of consistent surveys. The Excel application aggregates judgments from a group of people by the geometric mean in order to derive priorities for collaborative management. Although PROMETHEE is applied by using D-Sight software, we provide its implementation in Excel for illustrative purposes. This outranking approach enables us to select and prioritize projects and generates indicators to classify areas of the territory according to their main ecosystem services. These indicators are shown in graphs, which are simple to understand, providing relevant information for collaborative management of Natural Parks.

AB - Management of protected areas has been focusing on conservation and recreation. Nevertheless, current governance trends include other ecosystem services from social and economic perspectives by involving stakeholders. The objectives of this chapter are to select and prioritize projects, as well as to develop new indicators based on the main functions of ecosystems to classify the territory inside protected areas. Both purposes take into account the provided ecosystem services and the stakeholders’ preferences in order to implement a collaborative decision making tool in a forest Natural Park.When applying AHP in order to elicit people’s preferences, it is important to have a graphic tool, which allows answering pair comparisons easily, obtaining the inconsistency index online and facilitating the revision of their answers. This case study provides a friendly implementation with macros in Excel, which enables the users to elicit and then revise their judgments if their inconsistency index is not acceptable, increasing by a lot the percentage of consistent surveys. The Excel application aggregates judgments from a group of people by the geometric mean in order to derive priorities for collaborative management. Although PROMETHEE is applied by using D-Sight software, we provide its implementation in Excel for illustrative purposes. This outranking approach enables us to select and prioritize projects and generates indicators to classify areas of the territory according to their main ecosystem services. These indicators are shown in graphs, which are simple to understand, providing relevant information for collaborative management of Natural Parks.

KW - ecosystem management

KW - natural parks

KW - collaborative decision making tool

UR - https://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319993034

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319993034

SN - 9783319993041

T3 - International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

SP - 231

EP - 255

BT - Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding

A2 - Huber, Sandra

A2 - Geiger, Martin Josef

A2 - de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira

PB - Springer

CY - Cham, Switzerland

ER -

Segura M, Maroto C, Belton V, Ginestar C, Marqués I. Collaborative management of ecosystem services in natural parks based on AHP and PROMETHEE. In Huber S, Geiger MJ, de Almeida AT, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 2019. p. 231-255. (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_8