Cognitive outcomes 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of on-pump CABG and non-surgical controls

Ola A. Selnes, Maura A. Grega, Louis M. Borowicz, Sarah Barry, Scott Zeger, William A. Baumgartner, Guy M. McKhann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with both early and late postoperative cognitive decline, but interpretation of previous studies has been limited by lack of appropriate control groups. We compared changes in cognitive performance from baseline to 3 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with those of a control group of patients with known risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery.
Methods
Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed up prospectively at 3, 12, and 36 months. Cognitive performance was assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests, measuring the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. The statistical analyses were performed in two ways: using data from all tested individuals, and using a model imputing missing observations for individuals lost to follow-up.
Results
Both the coronary artery bypass grafting and nonsurgical control groups improved from baseline to 1 year, with additional improvement between 1 and 3 years for some cognitive tests. The coronary artery bypass grafting group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the nonsurgical controls for some subtests, and had a comparable longitudinal course for the remainder of the subtests. Both study groups had a trend toward nonsignificant decline at 3 years on some measures, but the overall differences between groups over time were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting did not differ from that of a comparable nonsurgical control group of patients with coronary artery disease at 1 or 3 years after baseline examination. This finding suggests that previously reported late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting may not be specific to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but may also occur in patients with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1201-1209
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume79
Issue number4
Early online date25 Mar 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Control Groups
Coronary Artery Disease
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Neuropsychological Tests
Lost to Follow-Up
Executive Function
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Cardiovascular Diseases
Language

Keywords

  • coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • cognitive decline
  • coronary artery disease
  • cognitive performance

Cite this

Selnes, Ola A. ; Grega, Maura A. ; Borowicz, Louis M. ; Barry, Sarah ; Zeger, Scott ; Baumgartner, William A. ; McKhann, Guy M. / Cognitive outcomes 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery : a comparison of on-pump CABG and non-surgical controls. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 79, No. 4. pp. 1201-1209.
@article{e3660cf055514aeaad186ddab4b23c2d,
title = "Cognitive outcomes 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of on-pump CABG and non-surgical controls",
abstract = "Background Coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with both early and late postoperative cognitive decline, but interpretation of previous studies has been limited by lack of appropriate control groups. We compared changes in cognitive performance from baseline to 3 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with those of a control group of patients with known risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery. Methods Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed up prospectively at 3, 12, and 36 months. Cognitive performance was assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests, measuring the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. The statistical analyses were performed in two ways: using data from all tested individuals, and using a model imputing missing observations for individuals lost to follow-up. Results Both the coronary artery bypass grafting and nonsurgical control groups improved from baseline to 1 year, with additional improvement between 1 and 3 years for some cognitive tests. The coronary artery bypass grafting group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the nonsurgical controls for some subtests, and had a comparable longitudinal course for the remainder of the subtests. Both study groups had a trend toward nonsignificant decline at 3 years on some measures, but the overall differences between groups over time were not statistically significant. Conclusions Prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting did not differ from that of a comparable nonsurgical control group of patients with coronary artery disease at 1 or 3 years after baseline examination. This finding suggests that previously reported late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting may not be specific to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but may also occur in patients with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.",
keywords = "coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), cognitive decline, coronary artery disease, cognitive performance",
author = "Selnes, {Ola A.} and Grega, {Maura A.} and Borowicz, {Louis M.} and Sarah Barry and Scott Zeger and Baumgartner, {William A.} and McKhann, {Guy M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1201--1209",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Cognitive outcomes 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery : a comparison of on-pump CABG and non-surgical controls. / Selnes, Ola A.; Grega, Maura A.; Borowicz, Louis M.; Barry, Sarah; Zeger, Scott; Baumgartner, William A.; McKhann, Guy M.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 79, No. 4, 30.04.2005, p. 1201-1209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive outcomes 3 years after coronary artery bypass surgery

T2 - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

AU - Selnes, Ola A.

AU - Grega, Maura A.

AU - Borowicz, Louis M.

AU - Barry, Sarah

AU - Zeger, Scott

AU - Baumgartner, William A.

AU - McKhann, Guy M.

PY - 2005/4/30

Y1 - 2005/4/30

N2 - Background Coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with both early and late postoperative cognitive decline, but interpretation of previous studies has been limited by lack of appropriate control groups. We compared changes in cognitive performance from baseline to 3 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with those of a control group of patients with known risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery. Methods Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed up prospectively at 3, 12, and 36 months. Cognitive performance was assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests, measuring the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. The statistical analyses were performed in two ways: using data from all tested individuals, and using a model imputing missing observations for individuals lost to follow-up. Results Both the coronary artery bypass grafting and nonsurgical control groups improved from baseline to 1 year, with additional improvement between 1 and 3 years for some cognitive tests. The coronary artery bypass grafting group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the nonsurgical controls for some subtests, and had a comparable longitudinal course for the remainder of the subtests. Both study groups had a trend toward nonsignificant decline at 3 years on some measures, but the overall differences between groups over time were not statistically significant. Conclusions Prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting did not differ from that of a comparable nonsurgical control group of patients with coronary artery disease at 1 or 3 years after baseline examination. This finding suggests that previously reported late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting may not be specific to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but may also occur in patients with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

AB - Background Coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated with both early and late postoperative cognitive decline, but interpretation of previous studies has been limited by lack of appropriate control groups. We compared changes in cognitive performance from baseline to 3 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with those of a control group of patients with known risk factors for coronary artery disease but without surgery. Methods Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 140) and a demographically similar nonsurgical control group with coronary artery disease (n = 92) completed baseline neuropsychological assessment and were followed up prospectively at 3, 12, and 36 months. Cognitive performance was assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests, measuring the cognitive domains of attention, language, verbal and visual memory, visuospatial, executive function, and psychomotor and motor speed. The statistical analyses were performed in two ways: using data from all tested individuals, and using a model imputing missing observations for individuals lost to follow-up. Results Both the coronary artery bypass grafting and nonsurgical control groups improved from baseline to 1 year, with additional improvement between 1 and 3 years for some cognitive tests. The coronary artery bypass grafting group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the nonsurgical controls for some subtests, and had a comparable longitudinal course for the remainder of the subtests. Both study groups had a trend toward nonsignificant decline at 3 years on some measures, but the overall differences between groups over time were not statistically significant. Conclusions Prospective longitudinal neuropsychological performance of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting did not differ from that of a comparable nonsurgical control group of patients with coronary artery disease at 1 or 3 years after baseline examination. This finding suggests that previously reported late cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting may not be specific to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, but may also occur in patients with similar risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

KW - coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)

KW - cognitive decline

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - cognitive performance

UR - http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/54274/

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-annals-of-thoracic-surgery

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.011

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1201

EP - 1209

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 4

ER -