Cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings of relational and conjunctive working memory binding across age

Bonnie van Geldorp, Mario A Parra, Roy P C Kessels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to form associations (i.e., binding) is critical for memory formation. Recent studies suggest that aging specifically affects relational binding (associating separate features) but not conjunctive binding (integrating features within an object). Possibly, this dissociation may be driven by the spatial nature of the studies so far. Alternatively, relational binding may simply require more attentional resources. We assessed relational and conjunctive binding in three age groups and we included an interfering task (i.e., an articulatory suppression task). Binding was examined in a working memory (WM) task using non-spatial features: shape and colour. Thirty-one young adults (mean age = 22.35), 30 middle-aged adults (mean age = 54.80) and 30 older adults (mean age = 70.27) performed the task. Results show an effect of type of binding and an effect of age but no interaction between type of binding and age. The interaction between type of binding and interference was significant. These results indicate that aging affects relational binding and conjunctive binding similarly. However, relational binding is more susceptible to interference than conjunctive binding, which suggests that relational binding may require more attentional resources. We suggest that a general decline in WM resources associated with frontal dysfunction underlies age-related deficits in WM binding.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1112-1122
Number of pages11
JournalMemory
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
Young Adult
Age Groups
Color
Working Memory

Keywords

  • working memory binding
  • working memory
  • relational memory
  • aging

Cite this

@article{c9fbdd8f42cd4c9087497da409090df9,
title = "Cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings of relational and conjunctive working memory binding across age",
abstract = "The ability to form associations (i.e., binding) is critical for memory formation. Recent studies suggest that aging specifically affects relational binding (associating separate features) but not conjunctive binding (integrating features within an object). Possibly, this dissociation may be driven by the spatial nature of the studies so far. Alternatively, relational binding may simply require more attentional resources. We assessed relational and conjunctive binding in three age groups and we included an interfering task (i.e., an articulatory suppression task). Binding was examined in a working memory (WM) task using non-spatial features: shape and colour. Thirty-one young adults (mean age = 22.35), 30 middle-aged adults (mean age = 54.80) and 30 older adults (mean age = 70.27) performed the task. Results show an effect of type of binding and an effect of age but no interaction between type of binding and age. The interaction between type of binding and interference was significant. These results indicate that aging affects relational binding and conjunctive binding similarly. However, relational binding is more susceptible to interference than conjunctive binding, which suggests that relational binding may require more attentional resources. We suggest that a general decline in WM resources associated with frontal dysfunction underlies age-related deficits in WM binding.",
keywords = "working memory binding, working memory, relational memory, aging",
author = "{van Geldorp}, Bonnie and Parra, {Mario A} and Kessels, {Roy P C}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2014.953959",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1112--1122",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
number = "8",

}

Cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings of relational and conjunctive working memory binding across age. / van Geldorp, Bonnie; Parra, Mario A; Kessels, Roy P C.

In: Memory, Vol. 23, No. 8, 12.09.2014, p. 1112-1122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings of relational and conjunctive working memory binding across age

AU - van Geldorp, Bonnie

AU - Parra, Mario A

AU - Kessels, Roy P C

PY - 2014/9/12

Y1 - 2014/9/12

N2 - The ability to form associations (i.e., binding) is critical for memory formation. Recent studies suggest that aging specifically affects relational binding (associating separate features) but not conjunctive binding (integrating features within an object). Possibly, this dissociation may be driven by the spatial nature of the studies so far. Alternatively, relational binding may simply require more attentional resources. We assessed relational and conjunctive binding in three age groups and we included an interfering task (i.e., an articulatory suppression task). Binding was examined in a working memory (WM) task using non-spatial features: shape and colour. Thirty-one young adults (mean age = 22.35), 30 middle-aged adults (mean age = 54.80) and 30 older adults (mean age = 70.27) performed the task. Results show an effect of type of binding and an effect of age but no interaction between type of binding and age. The interaction between type of binding and interference was significant. These results indicate that aging affects relational binding and conjunctive binding similarly. However, relational binding is more susceptible to interference than conjunctive binding, which suggests that relational binding may require more attentional resources. We suggest that a general decline in WM resources associated with frontal dysfunction underlies age-related deficits in WM binding.

AB - The ability to form associations (i.e., binding) is critical for memory formation. Recent studies suggest that aging specifically affects relational binding (associating separate features) but not conjunctive binding (integrating features within an object). Possibly, this dissociation may be driven by the spatial nature of the studies so far. Alternatively, relational binding may simply require more attentional resources. We assessed relational and conjunctive binding in three age groups and we included an interfering task (i.e., an articulatory suppression task). Binding was examined in a working memory (WM) task using non-spatial features: shape and colour. Thirty-one young adults (mean age = 22.35), 30 middle-aged adults (mean age = 54.80) and 30 older adults (mean age = 70.27) performed the task. Results show an effect of type of binding and an effect of age but no interaction between type of binding and age. The interaction between type of binding and interference was significant. These results indicate that aging affects relational binding and conjunctive binding similarly. However, relational binding is more susceptible to interference than conjunctive binding, which suggests that relational binding may require more attentional resources. We suggest that a general decline in WM resources associated with frontal dysfunction underlies age-related deficits in WM binding.

KW - working memory binding

KW - working memory

KW - relational memory

KW - aging

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2014.953959

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2014.953959

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1112

EP - 1122

JO - Memory

T2 - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 8

ER -