Abstract
This chapter explores how subtle differences in the meaning ascribed to 'co-production' have arisen, both because people using the term come from different disciplines, with widely differing theoretical roots, and because over time the idea behind co-production (the valuable contributions of citizens to organizations) has been discovered to have application to many aspects of organizational behavior. We examine critically [JT1] the concept of co-production in terms of its role in different types of citizen-government interaction, suggesting that citizens can add valuable inputs to the four main stages of the 'policy cycle', so that commissioning of public services and outcomes becomes co-commissioning, design becomes co-design, delivery becomes co-delivery and evaluation becomes co-assessment, giving us the 'Four Co's'. This makes clear that co-production has a strong political as well as 'technical' element - citizens may be involved in key political decisions about service and outcome priorities, not simply in managerial decisions about service delivery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Handbook on Theories of Governance |
Editors | Christopher Ansell, Jacob Torfing |
Place of Publication | Cheltenham |
Chapter | 39 |
Pages | 446-461 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781800371972 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 Feb 2022 |
Keywords
- co-production
- organisational behaviour
- citizen-government interaction