Co-producing desistance: who works to support desistance

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In 2003, McNeill argued that desistance research required a major shift in probation practice; a departure from practices underpinned solely by cognitive behavioural psychology focused on changing individual mindsets to practices attending to the relational and social contexts within and through which desistance occurs. Ten years hence, precisely how such a paradigm shift might be realised in practice remains inadequately understood. McNeill (2006:46) proposed that ‘offender management services need to think of themselves less as providers of correctional treatment (that belongs to the expert) and more as supporters of desistance processes (that belong to the desister).’ Maruna (2006:16) similarly argued that reintegration properly belongs to communities and to formerly incarcerated persons and that the role of the practitioner is to ‘support, enhance and work with the organically occurring community processes of reconciliation and earned redemption’.

    Building on these observations, this chapter will commence with a brief overview of the outcomes of desistance research to provide context to the principal focus of this chapter; exploring how such a paradigm shift can and should translate into practice. Moreover, recognizing that the process of desistance, and the people who support it, extend beyond penal practices and practitioners, the focus here is on how practitioners might begin to reconfigure their relationships with and to individuals, families, groups and communities in order to co-produce desistance. Given that the emphasis of this edited collection is on penal practices and practitioners, this chapter will not dwell on the important role of peer-productive practices (Pestoff 2012) such as peer mentoring, self help, activism and mutual aid and their vital contribution in collaboratively co-producing desistance promoting community justice services. Such practices are discussed elsewhere (see for example Maruna and LeBel 2009; Weaver 2011; Weaver and Lightowler 2012; Weaver and McCulloch 2012).
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationUnderstanding penal practice
    EditorsIoan Durnescu, Fergus McNeill
    Place of PublicationAbingdon
    Number of pages24
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2013

    Publication series

    NameRoutledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice
    PublisherRoutledge

    Fingerprint

    weaver
    community
    behavioral psychology
    paradigm
    probation
    reintegration
    self-help
    mentoring
    reconciliation
    offender
    justice
    expert
    human being
    management
    Group

    Keywords

    • Co-production
    • desistance
    • rehabilitation
    • criminal justice
    • offender

    Cite this

    Weaver, B. (2013). Co-producing desistance: who works to support desistance. In I. Durnescu, & F. McNeill (Eds.), Understanding penal practice (Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice). Abingdon.
    Weaver, Beth. / Co-producing desistance : who works to support desistance. Understanding penal practice. editor / Ioan Durnescu ; Fergus McNeill. Abingdon, 2013. (Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice).
    @inbook{4dd05fa964ef4694aae214fc9df7194f,
    title = "Co-producing desistance: who works to support desistance",
    abstract = "In 2003, McNeill argued that desistance research required a major shift in probation practice; a departure from practices underpinned solely by cognitive behavioural psychology focused on changing individual mindsets to practices attending to the relational and social contexts within and through which desistance occurs. Ten years hence, precisely how such a paradigm shift might be realised in practice remains inadequately understood. McNeill (2006:46) proposed that ‘offender management services need to think of themselves less as providers of correctional treatment (that belongs to the expert) and more as supporters of desistance processes (that belong to the desister).’ Maruna (2006:16) similarly argued that reintegration properly belongs to communities and to formerly incarcerated persons and that the role of the practitioner is to ‘support, enhance and work with the organically occurring community processes of reconciliation and earned redemption’. Building on these observations, this chapter will commence with a brief overview of the outcomes of desistance research to provide context to the principal focus of this chapter; exploring how such a paradigm shift can and should translate into practice. Moreover, recognizing that the process of desistance, and the people who support it, extend beyond penal practices and practitioners, the focus here is on how practitioners might begin to reconfigure their relationships with and to individuals, families, groups and communities in order to co-produce desistance. Given that the emphasis of this edited collection is on penal practices and practitioners, this chapter will not dwell on the important role of peer-productive practices (Pestoff 2012) such as peer mentoring, self help, activism and mutual aid and their vital contribution in collaboratively co-producing desistance promoting community justice services. Such practices are discussed elsewhere (see for example Maruna and LeBel 2009; Weaver 2011; Weaver and Lightowler 2012; Weaver and McCulloch 2012).",
    keywords = "Co-production, desistance, rehabilitation, criminal justice, offender",
    author = "Beth Weaver",
    year = "2013",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780415635813",
    series = "Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    editor = "Durnescu, {Ioan } and Fergus McNeill",
    booktitle = "Understanding penal practice",

    }

    Weaver, B 2013, Co-producing desistance: who works to support desistance. in I Durnescu & F McNeill (eds), Understanding penal practice. Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice, Abingdon.

    Co-producing desistance : who works to support desistance. / Weaver, Beth.

    Understanding penal practice. ed. / Ioan Durnescu; Fergus McNeill. Abingdon, 2013. (Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Co-producing desistance

    T2 - who works to support desistance

    AU - Weaver, Beth

    PY - 2013/10/1

    Y1 - 2013/10/1

    N2 - In 2003, McNeill argued that desistance research required a major shift in probation practice; a departure from practices underpinned solely by cognitive behavioural psychology focused on changing individual mindsets to practices attending to the relational and social contexts within and through which desistance occurs. Ten years hence, precisely how such a paradigm shift might be realised in practice remains inadequately understood. McNeill (2006:46) proposed that ‘offender management services need to think of themselves less as providers of correctional treatment (that belongs to the expert) and more as supporters of desistance processes (that belong to the desister).’ Maruna (2006:16) similarly argued that reintegration properly belongs to communities and to formerly incarcerated persons and that the role of the practitioner is to ‘support, enhance and work with the organically occurring community processes of reconciliation and earned redemption’. Building on these observations, this chapter will commence with a brief overview of the outcomes of desistance research to provide context to the principal focus of this chapter; exploring how such a paradigm shift can and should translate into practice. Moreover, recognizing that the process of desistance, and the people who support it, extend beyond penal practices and practitioners, the focus here is on how practitioners might begin to reconfigure their relationships with and to individuals, families, groups and communities in order to co-produce desistance. Given that the emphasis of this edited collection is on penal practices and practitioners, this chapter will not dwell on the important role of peer-productive practices (Pestoff 2012) such as peer mentoring, self help, activism and mutual aid and their vital contribution in collaboratively co-producing desistance promoting community justice services. Such practices are discussed elsewhere (see for example Maruna and LeBel 2009; Weaver 2011; Weaver and Lightowler 2012; Weaver and McCulloch 2012).

    AB - In 2003, McNeill argued that desistance research required a major shift in probation practice; a departure from practices underpinned solely by cognitive behavioural psychology focused on changing individual mindsets to practices attending to the relational and social contexts within and through which desistance occurs. Ten years hence, precisely how such a paradigm shift might be realised in practice remains inadequately understood. McNeill (2006:46) proposed that ‘offender management services need to think of themselves less as providers of correctional treatment (that belongs to the expert) and more as supporters of desistance processes (that belong to the desister).’ Maruna (2006:16) similarly argued that reintegration properly belongs to communities and to formerly incarcerated persons and that the role of the practitioner is to ‘support, enhance and work with the organically occurring community processes of reconciliation and earned redemption’. Building on these observations, this chapter will commence with a brief overview of the outcomes of desistance research to provide context to the principal focus of this chapter; exploring how such a paradigm shift can and should translate into practice. Moreover, recognizing that the process of desistance, and the people who support it, extend beyond penal practices and practitioners, the focus here is on how practitioners might begin to reconfigure their relationships with and to individuals, families, groups and communities in order to co-produce desistance. Given that the emphasis of this edited collection is on penal practices and practitioners, this chapter will not dwell on the important role of peer-productive practices (Pestoff 2012) such as peer mentoring, self help, activism and mutual aid and their vital contribution in collaboratively co-producing desistance promoting community justice services. Such practices are discussed elsewhere (see for example Maruna and LeBel 2009; Weaver 2011; Weaver and Lightowler 2012; Weaver and McCulloch 2012).

    KW - Co-production

    KW - desistance

    KW - rehabilitation

    KW - criminal justice

    KW - offender

    UR - http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415635813/

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780415635813

    T3 - Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice

    BT - Understanding penal practice

    A2 - Durnescu, Ioan

    A2 - McNeill, Fergus

    CY - Abingdon

    ER -

    Weaver B. Co-producing desistance: who works to support desistance. In Durnescu I, McNeill F, editors, Understanding penal practice. Abingdon. 2013. (Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice).