Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis

F.J. Acedo, C. Barroso, C. Casanueva, J.L. Galán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

260 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co-authorship have taken two different approaches. The first one attempts to analyse the reasons why authors collaborate and the consequences of such decision (Laband and Tollison, 2000). The second approach is based on the idea that co-authorship creates a social network of researchers (Barabási et al., 2002; Moody, 2004; Newman, 2001). In this study we have carried out an exploratory analysis of co-authorships in the field of management from the two aforementioned approaches. The results obtained show a growing tendency of the co-authored papers in the field of management, similar to what can be observed in other disciplines. Our study analyses some of the underpinning factors, which have been highlighted in the literature, explaining this tendency. Thus, the progressive quantitative character of research and the influence of the collaboration on the articles' impact are enhanced. The network analysis permits the exploration of the peculiarities of the management in comparison with other fields of knowledge, as well as the existing linkages between the most central and prominent authors within this discipline.
LanguageEnglish
Pages957-983
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Electric network analysis
Empirical analysis
Co-authorship
Management studies
Network analysis
Organizational studies

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • co-authorship
  • social network
  • researchers
  • management

Cite this

Acedo, F.J. ; Barroso, C. ; Casanueva, C. ; Galán, J.L. / Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. In: Journal of Management Studies. 2006 ; Vol. 43, No. 5. pp. 957-983.
@article{0766a11e50194a698e664fdf20035521,
title = "Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis",
abstract = "In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co-authorship have taken two different approaches. The first one attempts to analyse the reasons why authors collaborate and the consequences of such decision (Laband and Tollison, 2000). The second approach is based on the idea that co-authorship creates a social network of researchers (Barab{\'a}si et al., 2002; Moody, 2004; Newman, 2001). In this study we have carried out an exploratory analysis of co-authorships in the field of management from the two aforementioned approaches. The results obtained show a growing tendency of the co-authored papers in the field of management, similar to what can be observed in other disciplines. Our study analyses some of the underpinning factors, which have been highlighted in the literature, explaining this tendency. Thus, the progressive quantitative character of research and the influence of the collaboration on the articles' impact are enhanced. The network analysis permits the exploration of the peculiarities of the management in comparison with other fields of knowledge, as well as the existing linkages between the most central and prominent authors within this discipline.",
keywords = "collaboration, co-authorship, social network, researchers, management",
author = "F.J. Acedo and C. Barroso and C. Casanueva and J.L. Gal{\'a}n",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "957--983",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
number = "5",

}

Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. / Acedo, F.J.; Barroso, C.; Casanueva, C.; Galán, J.L.

In: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 5, 07.2006, p. 957-983.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis

AU - Acedo, F.J.

AU - Barroso, C.

AU - Casanueva, C.

AU - Galán, J.L.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co-authorship have taken two different approaches. The first one attempts to analyse the reasons why authors collaborate and the consequences of such decision (Laband and Tollison, 2000). The second approach is based on the idea that co-authorship creates a social network of researchers (Barabási et al., 2002; Moody, 2004; Newman, 2001). In this study we have carried out an exploratory analysis of co-authorships in the field of management from the two aforementioned approaches. The results obtained show a growing tendency of the co-authored papers in the field of management, similar to what can be observed in other disciplines. Our study analyses some of the underpinning factors, which have been highlighted in the literature, explaining this tendency. Thus, the progressive quantitative character of research and the influence of the collaboration on the articles' impact are enhanced. The network analysis permits the exploration of the peculiarities of the management in comparison with other fields of knowledge, as well as the existing linkages between the most central and prominent authors within this discipline.

AB - In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co-authorship have taken two different approaches. The first one attempts to analyse the reasons why authors collaborate and the consequences of such decision (Laband and Tollison, 2000). The second approach is based on the idea that co-authorship creates a social network of researchers (Barabási et al., 2002; Moody, 2004; Newman, 2001). In this study we have carried out an exploratory analysis of co-authorships in the field of management from the two aforementioned approaches. The results obtained show a growing tendency of the co-authored papers in the field of management, similar to what can be observed in other disciplines. Our study analyses some of the underpinning factors, which have been highlighted in the literature, explaining this tendency. Thus, the progressive quantitative character of research and the influence of the collaboration on the articles' impact are enhanced. The network analysis permits the exploration of the peculiarities of the management in comparison with other fields of knowledge, as well as the existing linkages between the most central and prominent authors within this discipline.

KW - collaboration

KW - co-authorship

KW - social network

KW - researchers

KW - management

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 957

EP - 983

JO - Journal of Management Studies

T2 - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 5

ER -