Closing the gap in building performance: learning from BIM benchmark industries

Paul G. Tuohy, Gavin B. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is clear that the current industry process needs to improve in order to routinely deliver comfortable low-carbon buildings. Overheating in buildings designed to be of low energy is one of the key symptoms of current problems. Many initiatives aim to improve building performance and the industry process. A selection of these initiatives are reviewed including: the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; the Green Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and National Australian Building Environmental Rating Standards (NABERS) rating schemes; the Passivhaus standard; the Soft Landings process and Building Information Modelling (BIM). The BIM approach is being actively promoted based on the assertion that the building industry process has stagnated compared to other industries suggested as productivity benchmarks such as the electronics industry. This study highlights the potential role that could be played by BIM as a framework to address the performance gaps, and suggests that processes from the BIM benchmark industries should be investigated for potential adoption. The organizational context and processes of the electronics industry are described, and it is proposed that they could be usefully adapted to reduce the scale and impacts of the building industry performance gap. Key conclusions are that public domain performance data are important, and that the adoption of a quality systems approach will be required to deliver the intended performance in practice, eliminate overheating and avoid excess energy use.

LanguageEnglish
Pages47-56
Number of pages10
JournalArchitectural Science Review
Volume58
Issue number1
Early online date19 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Industry
Electronics industry
Landing
Stars
Productivity
Carbon
Environmental design
Environmental assessments

Keywords

  • BIM
  • LEED
  • NABERS
  • performance gap
  • Soft Landings
  • Quality
  • six sigma
  • Passivhaus
  • Carbon buzz
  • Energy star
  • Green star
  • low carbon buildings
  • BREEAM
  • sustainability
  • FMEA

Cite this

@article{ea4d7e04ea4342f9bb972ac3d93b83cd,
title = "Closing the gap in building performance: learning from BIM benchmark industries",
abstract = "It is clear that the current industry process needs to improve in order to routinely deliver comfortable low-carbon buildings. Overheating in buildings designed to be of low energy is one of the key symptoms of current problems. Many initiatives aim to improve building performance and the industry process. A selection of these initiatives are reviewed including: the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; the Green Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and National Australian Building Environmental Rating Standards (NABERS) rating schemes; the Passivhaus standard; the Soft Landings process and Building Information Modelling (BIM). The BIM approach is being actively promoted based on the assertion that the building industry process has stagnated compared to other industries suggested as productivity benchmarks such as the electronics industry. This study highlights the potential role that could be played by BIM as a framework to address the performance gaps, and suggests that processes from the BIM benchmark industries should be investigated for potential adoption. The organizational context and processes of the electronics industry are described, and it is proposed that they could be usefully adapted to reduce the scale and impacts of the building industry performance gap. Key conclusions are that public domain performance data are important, and that the adoption of a quality systems approach will be required to deliver the intended performance in practice, eliminate overheating and avoid excess energy use.",
keywords = "BIM, LEED, NABERS, performance gap, Soft Landings, Quality, six sigma, Passivhaus, Carbon buzz, Energy star, Green star, low carbon buildings, BREEAM, sustainability, FMEA",
author = "Tuohy, {Paul G.} and Murphy, {Gavin B.}",
note = "AAM completed online in publisher's formatted proforma",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00038628.2014.975780",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "Architectural Science Review",
issn = "0003-8628",
number = "1",

}

Closing the gap in building performance : learning from BIM benchmark industries. / Tuohy, Paul G.; Murphy, Gavin B.

In: Architectural Science Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closing the gap in building performance

T2 - Architectural Science Review

AU - Tuohy, Paul G.

AU - Murphy, Gavin B.

N1 - AAM completed online in publisher's formatted proforma

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - It is clear that the current industry process needs to improve in order to routinely deliver comfortable low-carbon buildings. Overheating in buildings designed to be of low energy is one of the key symptoms of current problems. Many initiatives aim to improve building performance and the industry process. A selection of these initiatives are reviewed including: the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; the Green Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and National Australian Building Environmental Rating Standards (NABERS) rating schemes; the Passivhaus standard; the Soft Landings process and Building Information Modelling (BIM). The BIM approach is being actively promoted based on the assertion that the building industry process has stagnated compared to other industries suggested as productivity benchmarks such as the electronics industry. This study highlights the potential role that could be played by BIM as a framework to address the performance gaps, and suggests that processes from the BIM benchmark industries should be investigated for potential adoption. The organizational context and processes of the electronics industry are described, and it is proposed that they could be usefully adapted to reduce the scale and impacts of the building industry performance gap. Key conclusions are that public domain performance data are important, and that the adoption of a quality systems approach will be required to deliver the intended performance in practice, eliminate overheating and avoid excess energy use.

AB - It is clear that the current industry process needs to improve in order to routinely deliver comfortable low-carbon buildings. Overheating in buildings designed to be of low energy is one of the key symptoms of current problems. Many initiatives aim to improve building performance and the industry process. A selection of these initiatives are reviewed including: the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; the Green Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and National Australian Building Environmental Rating Standards (NABERS) rating schemes; the Passivhaus standard; the Soft Landings process and Building Information Modelling (BIM). The BIM approach is being actively promoted based on the assertion that the building industry process has stagnated compared to other industries suggested as productivity benchmarks such as the electronics industry. This study highlights the potential role that could be played by BIM as a framework to address the performance gaps, and suggests that processes from the BIM benchmark industries should be investigated for potential adoption. The organizational context and processes of the electronics industry are described, and it is proposed that they could be usefully adapted to reduce the scale and impacts of the building industry performance gap. Key conclusions are that public domain performance data are important, and that the adoption of a quality systems approach will be required to deliver the intended performance in practice, eliminate overheating and avoid excess energy use.

KW - BIM

KW - LEED

KW - NABERS

KW - performance gap

KW - Soft Landings

KW - Quality

KW - six sigma

KW - Passivhaus

KW - Carbon buzz

KW - Energy star

KW - Green star

KW - low carbon buildings

KW - BREEAM

KW - sustainability

KW - FMEA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911489471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://tandfonline.com/toc/tasr20/current

U2 - 10.1080/00038628.2014.975780

DO - 10.1080/00038628.2014.975780

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - Architectural Science Review

JF - Architectural Science Review

SN - 0003-8628

IS - 1

ER -