Closing the feedback loop: tensions and challenges

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Providing information to students on the impact of their feedback is a crucial part of using institution-wide surveys such as the National Student Survey. The most common approach is to provide information about concrete changes made to course provision in explicit response to requests or complaints discerned in student feedback. Whilst that method is clear and direct, it is arguably unsuitable for those institutions who wish to promote the idea that students are partners in an educational process, rather than consumers of an educational product. For those institutions, new approaches are needed. This chapter suggests that Arnstein’s ladder of participation may offer a suitable alternative, by helping institutions to create and communicate an interconnected set of opportunities for students to be involved in decision-making at a number of different levels.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEnhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education
    EditorsMahsood Shah, Chenicheri Sid Nair
    Place of PublicationAbu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Pages85-99
    Number of pages14
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2013

    Publication series

    NameCAA Quality Series
    PublisherCommission for Academic Accreditation
    No.5

    Fingerprint

    student
    complaint
    decision making
    participation
    educational process

    Keywords

    • national student survey
    • student feedback
    • student engagement

    Cite this

    Buckley, A. (2013). Closing the feedback loop: tensions and challenges. In M. Shah, & C. Sid Nair (Eds.), Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education (pp. 85-99). (CAA Quality Series; No. 5). Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
    Buckley, Alex. / Closing the feedback loop : tensions and challenges. Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education. editor / Mahsood Shah ; Chenicheri Sid Nair. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2013. pp. 85-99 (CAA Quality Series; 5).
    @inbook{641c33896d6a436da5b52fc37ec6ccce,
    title = "Closing the feedback loop: tensions and challenges",
    abstract = "Providing information to students on the impact of their feedback is a crucial part of using institution-wide surveys such as the National Student Survey. The most common approach is to provide information about concrete changes made to course provision in explicit response to requests or complaints discerned in student feedback. Whilst that method is clear and direct, it is arguably unsuitable for those institutions who wish to promote the idea that students are partners in an educational process, rather than consumers of an educational product. For those institutions, new approaches are needed. This chapter suggests that Arnstein’s ladder of participation may offer a suitable alternative, by helping institutions to create and communicate an interconnected set of opportunities for students to be involved in decision-making at a number of different levels.",
    keywords = "national student survey, student feedback, student engagement",
    author = "Alex Buckley",
    year = "2013",
    month = "6",
    day = "30",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-9948-20-153-3",
    series = "CAA Quality Series",
    publisher = "Commission for Academic Accreditation",
    number = "5",
    pages = "85--99",
    editor = "Mahsood Shah and {Sid Nair}, Chenicheri",
    booktitle = "Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education",

    }

    Buckley, A 2013, Closing the feedback loop: tensions and challenges. in M Shah & C Sid Nair (eds), Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education. CAA Quality Series, no. 5, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp. 85-99.

    Closing the feedback loop : tensions and challenges. / Buckley, Alex.

    Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education. ed. / Mahsood Shah; Chenicheri Sid Nair. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2013. p. 85-99 (CAA Quality Series; No. 5).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Closing the feedback loop

    T2 - tensions and challenges

    AU - Buckley, Alex

    PY - 2013/6/30

    Y1 - 2013/6/30

    N2 - Providing information to students on the impact of their feedback is a crucial part of using institution-wide surveys such as the National Student Survey. The most common approach is to provide information about concrete changes made to course provision in explicit response to requests or complaints discerned in student feedback. Whilst that method is clear and direct, it is arguably unsuitable for those institutions who wish to promote the idea that students are partners in an educational process, rather than consumers of an educational product. For those institutions, new approaches are needed. This chapter suggests that Arnstein’s ladder of participation may offer a suitable alternative, by helping institutions to create and communicate an interconnected set of opportunities for students to be involved in decision-making at a number of different levels.

    AB - Providing information to students on the impact of their feedback is a crucial part of using institution-wide surveys such as the National Student Survey. The most common approach is to provide information about concrete changes made to course provision in explicit response to requests or complaints discerned in student feedback. Whilst that method is clear and direct, it is arguably unsuitable for those institutions who wish to promote the idea that students are partners in an educational process, rather than consumers of an educational product. For those institutions, new approaches are needed. This chapter suggests that Arnstein’s ladder of participation may offer a suitable alternative, by helping institutions to create and communicate an interconnected set of opportunities for students to be involved in decision-making at a number of different levels.

    KW - national student survey

    KW - student feedback

    KW - student engagement

    UR - https://www.caa.ae/caa/images/qaseries_5.pdf

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-9948-20-153-3

    T3 - CAA Quality Series

    SP - 85

    EP - 99

    BT - Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education

    A2 - Shah, Mahsood

    A2 - Sid Nair, Chenicheri

    CY - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    ER -

    Buckley A. Closing the feedback loop: tensions and challenges. In Shah M, Sid Nair C, editors, Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 2013. p. 85-99. (CAA Quality Series; 5).