Clinical spectroscopy: general discussion

Royston Goodacre, Valter Sergo, Hugh Barr, Christopher Sammon, Zachary D. Schultz, Matthew J. Baker, Duncan Graham, Maria Paula Marques, Josep Sulé-Suso, James Livermore, Karen Faulds, Faris Sinjab, Pavel Matousek, Colin J. Campbell, Richard Dluhy, Peter Gardner, Christopher Phillips, Max Diem, Bayden Wood, Alexander ApolonskiySergei Kazarian, Leanne Fullwood, Kathleen Gough, Wolfgang Petrich, Gavin Lloyd, Ola Ibrahim, Gianfelice Cinque, Ganesh Dhruvananda Sockalingum, Nick Stone, Catherine Kendall, Sarah McAughtrie, David Perez-Guaita, Louise Clark, Klaus Gerwert, Alois Bonifacio, Ioan Notingher, Peter Lasch, Rohit Bhargava, Guillaume Lepert, Kerstin Mader, Carl Paterson

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Duncan Graham opened a general discussion of the paper by Pavel Matousek: Regarding the temperature measurements, how did you do them? Stokes/anti-Stokes measurement? The values are not what I'd expect and seem lower. What was the wavelength and power of the laser and did you calculate what you thought the temperature measurement should be based on that? How far does the temperature gradient reach? The scattering absorption ration changes with nanoparticle size and composition. Have you thought about using more highly absorbing nanoparticles such as hollow gold nanoshells?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-460
Number of pages32
JournalFaraday Discussions
Volume187
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Stokes measurement
  • spectroscopy
  • raman scattering

Cite this

Goodacre, R., Sergo, V., Barr, H., Sammon, C., Schultz, Z. D., Baker, M. J., ... Paterson, C. (2016). Clinical spectroscopy: general discussion. Faraday Discussions, 187, 429-460. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD90013E