Clinical improvements with electromagnetic navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Mark Blyth, Bryn Jones, Julie Smith, Philip Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

Abstract

Recent advancements in optical navigated TKA have shown improved overall limb alignment, implant placement and reduced outliers compared to conventional TKA. This study represents the first RCT comparing EM navigation and conventional TKA. 3D alignment was analysed from CT scans. Clinical scores (Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS)) were recorded at pre-op, 3 and 12 months post-op. Data presented includes 180 patients (n=90 per group) at 3 months and 140 (n=70 per group) at 12 months.
The groups had similar mean mechanical axis alignments (EM 0.31° valgus; conventional 0.15° valgus). Mechanical axis alignment however was improved in the EM group with 92% within +/−3° of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group (p=0.90). The EM group showed improved coronal and sagittal femoral alignment and improved coronal, sagittal and rotational tibial alignment, which was significant for sagittal femoral alignment (p=0.04). The OKS and AKSS scores were significantly better for the EM group at 3 months post-op (OKS p=0.02, AKSS p=0.04), but there was no difference between groups at 12 months. The mean pre-op range of motion (ROM) for both groups was 105°. This decreased at 3 months to 102° in the EM group and 99° in the conventional group, but there was a significant improvement by 12 months: EM=113° (p=0.012) and conventional=112° (p=0.026). ROM was statistically similar between groups at all assessment phases.
Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. ROM was seen to decrease at 3 months but then significantly improve by 12 month post-op. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.
LanguageEnglish
Pages44
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Volume94-B
Issue numberSUPP XXIX
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Knee
Navigation
Articular Range of Motion
Thigh
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Computerized tomography
Extremities
Cost effectiveness
Navigation systems

Keywords

  • clinical improvement
  • electromagnetic navigation
  • total knee
  • arthroplasty

Cite this

@article{a1ec833ea9354f61965cebb905cab6eb,
title = "Clinical improvements with electromagnetic navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty",
abstract = "Recent advancements in optical navigated TKA have shown improved overall limb alignment, implant placement and reduced outliers compared to conventional TKA. This study represents the first RCT comparing EM navigation and conventional TKA. 3D alignment was analysed from CT scans. Clinical scores (Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS)) were recorded at pre-op, 3 and 12 months post-op. Data presented includes 180 patients (n=90 per group) at 3 months and 140 (n=70 per group) at 12 months. The groups had similar mean mechanical axis alignments (EM 0.31° valgus; conventional 0.15° valgus). Mechanical axis alignment however was improved in the EM group with 92{\%} within +/−3° of neutral compared to 84{\%} of the conventional group (p=0.90). The EM group showed improved coronal and sagittal femoral alignment and improved coronal, sagittal and rotational tibial alignment, which was significant for sagittal femoral alignment (p=0.04). The OKS and AKSS scores were significantly better for the EM group at 3 months post-op (OKS p=0.02, AKSS p=0.04), but there was no difference between groups at 12 months. The mean pre-op range of motion (ROM) for both groups was 105°. This decreased at 3 months to 102° in the EM group and 99° in the conventional group, but there was a significant improvement by 12 months: EM=113° (p=0.012) and conventional=112° (p=0.026). ROM was statistically similar between groups at all assessment phases. Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. ROM was seen to decrease at 3 months but then significantly improve by 12 month post-op. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.",
keywords = "clinical improvement, electromagnetic navigation, total knee, arthroplasty",
author = "Mark Blyth and Bryn Jones and Julie Smith and Philip Rowe",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "94-B",
pages = "44",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
number = "SUPP XXIX",

}

Clinical improvements with electromagnetic navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. / Blyth, Mark; Jones, Bryn; Smith, Julie; Rowe, Philip.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol. 94-B, No. SUPP XXIX, 2012, p. 44.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical improvements with electromagnetic navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

AU - Blyth, Mark

AU - Jones, Bryn

AU - Smith, Julie

AU - Rowe, Philip

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Recent advancements in optical navigated TKA have shown improved overall limb alignment, implant placement and reduced outliers compared to conventional TKA. This study represents the first RCT comparing EM navigation and conventional TKA. 3D alignment was analysed from CT scans. Clinical scores (Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS)) were recorded at pre-op, 3 and 12 months post-op. Data presented includes 180 patients (n=90 per group) at 3 months and 140 (n=70 per group) at 12 months. The groups had similar mean mechanical axis alignments (EM 0.31° valgus; conventional 0.15° valgus). Mechanical axis alignment however was improved in the EM group with 92% within +/−3° of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group (p=0.90). The EM group showed improved coronal and sagittal femoral alignment and improved coronal, sagittal and rotational tibial alignment, which was significant for sagittal femoral alignment (p=0.04). The OKS and AKSS scores were significantly better for the EM group at 3 months post-op (OKS p=0.02, AKSS p=0.04), but there was no difference between groups at 12 months. The mean pre-op range of motion (ROM) for both groups was 105°. This decreased at 3 months to 102° in the EM group and 99° in the conventional group, but there was a significant improvement by 12 months: EM=113° (p=0.012) and conventional=112° (p=0.026). ROM was statistically similar between groups at all assessment phases. Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. ROM was seen to decrease at 3 months but then significantly improve by 12 month post-op. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.

AB - Recent advancements in optical navigated TKA have shown improved overall limb alignment, implant placement and reduced outliers compared to conventional TKA. This study represents the first RCT comparing EM navigation and conventional TKA. 3D alignment was analysed from CT scans. Clinical scores (Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS)) were recorded at pre-op, 3 and 12 months post-op. Data presented includes 180 patients (n=90 per group) at 3 months and 140 (n=70 per group) at 12 months. The groups had similar mean mechanical axis alignments (EM 0.31° valgus; conventional 0.15° valgus). Mechanical axis alignment however was improved in the EM group with 92% within +/−3° of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group (p=0.90). The EM group showed improved coronal and sagittal femoral alignment and improved coronal, sagittal and rotational tibial alignment, which was significant for sagittal femoral alignment (p=0.04). The OKS and AKSS scores were significantly better for the EM group at 3 months post-op (OKS p=0.02, AKSS p=0.04), but there was no difference between groups at 12 months. The mean pre-op range of motion (ROM) for both groups was 105°. This decreased at 3 months to 102° in the EM group and 99° in the conventional group, but there was a significant improvement by 12 months: EM=113° (p=0.012) and conventional=112° (p=0.026). ROM was statistically similar between groups at all assessment phases. Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. ROM was seen to decrease at 3 months but then significantly improve by 12 month post-op. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.

KW - clinical improvement

KW - electromagnetic navigation

KW - total knee

KW - arthroplasty

UR - http://www.bjjprocs.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/94-B/SUPP_XXIX/44.abstract

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 94-B

SP - 44

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

T2 - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - SUPP XXIX

ER -