TY - JOUR
T1 - Cleanliness audit of clinical surfaces and equipment: who cleans what?
AU - Anderson, R E
AU - Young, V
AU - Stewart, M
AU - Robertson, Christopher
AU - Dancer, S J
N1 - Copyright © 2011 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Current guidelines recommend regular cleaning of clinical equipment. We monitored items on a surgical ward for predominant user, hand-touch frequency, cleaning responsibilities and measurement of organic soil. Equipment was assessed in triplicate against a cleanliness benchmark of 100 relative light units (RLU) using the Hygiena® ATP system. There were 44 items, of which 21 were cleaned by clinical support workers (CSWs), five by domestic staff; three by nurses, three by doctors, and 12 with no designated cleaning responsibility. Geometric mean RLUs ranged from 60 to 550/100 cm² for small items such as hand-gel containers, bed control, blood pressure cuff and clinical notes; with similar values of 80-540/100 cm² RLU for larger items such as electrocardiogram machine, defibrillator, trolleys and tables. Overall geometric mean was 249/100 cm² RLU for all surfaces, with 84% (37 of 44) items exceeding the 100RLU benchmark. Of 27 items cleaned by clinical staff, 24 (89%) failed the benchmark. Of 12 sites with no cleaning specification, 11 (92%) failed the benchmark. Three of seven 'clean' sites (
AB - Current guidelines recommend regular cleaning of clinical equipment. We monitored items on a surgical ward for predominant user, hand-touch frequency, cleaning responsibilities and measurement of organic soil. Equipment was assessed in triplicate against a cleanliness benchmark of 100 relative light units (RLU) using the Hygiena® ATP system. There were 44 items, of which 21 were cleaned by clinical support workers (CSWs), five by domestic staff; three by nurses, three by doctors, and 12 with no designated cleaning responsibility. Geometric mean RLUs ranged from 60 to 550/100 cm² for small items such as hand-gel containers, bed control, blood pressure cuff and clinical notes; with similar values of 80-540/100 cm² RLU for larger items such as electrocardiogram machine, defibrillator, trolleys and tables. Overall geometric mean was 249/100 cm² RLU for all surfaces, with 84% (37 of 44) items exceeding the 100RLU benchmark. Of 27 items cleaned by clinical staff, 24 (89%) failed the benchmark. Of 12 sites with no cleaning specification, 11 (92%) failed the benchmark. Three of seven 'clean' sites (
KW - decontamination
KW - environmental microbiology
KW - equipment and supplies
KW - health services research
KW - humans
KW - quality assurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958725715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030
DO - 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 21497943
SN - 0195-6701
VL - 78
SP - 178
EP - 181
JO - Journal of Hospital Infection
JF - Journal of Hospital Infection
IS - 3
ER -