Clausal interference during reference production

Roger P. G. van Gompel, Kumiko Fukumura

Research output: Contribution to conferenceProceeding

Abstract

Four sentence completion experiments investigated how language producers refer back to human characters when they are mentioned in different clauses in the preceding sentence. Participants produced fewer pronouns and more names when the characters were mentioned in the same type of clause (both main or both subordinate) than when they were mentioned in different clause types. This suggests that clauses with the same status interfere, thereby making the discourse entities less accessible. Participants also used more pronouns and fewer names when the antecedent was in a main than a subordinate clause and when it was the most recent rather than a more distant clause, indicating that main and recent clauses are most accessible.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventPRE-CogSci 2013: Production of Referrring Expressions: Bridging the gap between cognitive and computational approaches to reference - Berlin, Germany
Duration: 31 Jul 2013 → …

Conference

ConferencePRE-CogSci 2013
CountryGermany
CityBerlin
Period31/07/13 → …
OtherWorkshop organised as part of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013)

Fingerprint

Names
Language

Keywords

  • language production
  • reference
  • pronouns
  • names
  • interference
  • competition
  • clause status
  • main and subordinate clause
  • recency

Cite this

van Gompel, R. P. G., & Fukumura, K. (2013). Clausal interference during reference production. PRE-CogSci 2013, Berlin, Germany.
van Gompel, Roger P. G. ; Fukumura, Kumiko. / Clausal interference during reference production. PRE-CogSci 2013, Berlin, Germany.5 p.
@conference{6f978cd435d047fd905187e684d838fd,
title = "Clausal interference during reference production",
abstract = "Four sentence completion experiments investigated how language producers refer back to human characters when they are mentioned in different clauses in the preceding sentence. Participants produced fewer pronouns and more names when the characters were mentioned in the same type of clause (both main or both subordinate) than when they were mentioned in different clause types. This suggests that clauses with the same status interfere, thereby making the discourse entities less accessible. Participants also used more pronouns and fewer names when the antecedent was in a main than a subordinate clause and when it was the most recent rather than a more distant clause, indicating that main and recent clauses are most accessible.",
keywords = "language production, reference, pronouns, names, interference, competition, clause status, main and subordinate clause, recency",
author = "{van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.} and Kumiko Fukumura",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
note = "PRE-CogSci 2013 : Production of Referrring Expressions: Bridging the gap between cognitive and computational approaches to reference ; Conference date: 31-07-2013",

}

van Gompel, RPG & Fukumura, K 2013, 'Clausal interference during reference production' PRE-CogSci 2013, Berlin, Germany, 31/07/13, .

Clausal interference during reference production. / van Gompel, Roger P. G.; Fukumura, Kumiko.

2013. PRE-CogSci 2013, Berlin, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceProceeding

TY - CONF

T1 - Clausal interference during reference production

AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

AU - Fukumura, Kumiko

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Four sentence completion experiments investigated how language producers refer back to human characters when they are mentioned in different clauses in the preceding sentence. Participants produced fewer pronouns and more names when the characters were mentioned in the same type of clause (both main or both subordinate) than when they were mentioned in different clause types. This suggests that clauses with the same status interfere, thereby making the discourse entities less accessible. Participants also used more pronouns and fewer names when the antecedent was in a main than a subordinate clause and when it was the most recent rather than a more distant clause, indicating that main and recent clauses are most accessible.

AB - Four sentence completion experiments investigated how language producers refer back to human characters when they are mentioned in different clauses in the preceding sentence. Participants produced fewer pronouns and more names when the characters were mentioned in the same type of clause (both main or both subordinate) than when they were mentioned in different clause types. This suggests that clauses with the same status interfere, thereby making the discourse entities less accessible. Participants also used more pronouns and fewer names when the antecedent was in a main than a subordinate clause and when it was the most recent rather than a more distant clause, indicating that main and recent clauses are most accessible.

KW - language production

KW - reference

KW - pronouns

KW - names

KW - interference

KW - competition

KW - clause status

KW - main and subordinate clause

KW - recency

UR - https://pre2013.uvt.nl/index.html

M3 - Proceeding

ER -

van Gompel RPG, Fukumura K. Clausal interference during reference production. 2013. PRE-CogSci 2013, Berlin, Germany.