Civic republican political theory and labour law

David Cabrelli, Rebecca Zahn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Several justifications are cited in the academic literature in favour of common law and statutory intervention in the field of labour law. First, there is the traditional ‘inequality of bargaining power’ rationale. This justification shares some commonalities with the second rationale, namely that labour laws are an integral part of the package that must be put in place to prevent the commodification of labour and achieve social justice and a more egalitarian society, in terms of the appropriate distribution of resources and opportunities. Finally, in recent times, the ‘law of the labour market’ school of thought has sought to conceptualise labour law as a discipline in more economic terms, in the sense that it promotes, and ought to promote, a regulated labour market that is well-functioning for the benefit of all. However, these justifications have been criticised for ignoring the realities of the contemporary labour market where increasing numbers of people work outside the confines of standard employment contracts and for even bothering to undertake such a ‘sterile’ exercise as attempting to identify a theoretical explanation for the discipline in the first place. One must therefore ask to what extent traditional justifications for the legal regulation of the employment relationship have become frayed at the edges as a result of changes in underlying political, social, economic and industrial conditions over the past half century. For example, to what extent do such developments render the orthodox rationales outmoded or redundant? In response to this question, a strand of academic literature has emerged which offers alternative theoretical support for the regulation of the work relationship.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhilosophical Foundations of Labour Law
EditorsHugh Collins, Gillian Lester, Virginia Mantouvalou
Place of PublicationOxford
Chapter5
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2018

Publication series

NamePhilosophical Foundations of Law
PublisherOxford University Press

Fingerprint

Labor and Law
labor law
political theory
labor market
employment contract
employment relationship
regulation
bargaining power
common law
social economics
social justice
labor
Law
resources
economics
literature

Keywords

  • common law
  • labour law

Cite this

Cabrelli, D., & Zahn, R. (2018). Civic republican political theory and labour law. In H. Collins, G. Lester, & V. Mantouvalou (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law (Philosophical Foundations of Law). Oxford.
Cabrelli, David ; Zahn, Rebecca. / Civic republican political theory and labour law. Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. editor / Hugh Collins ; Gillian Lester ; Virginia Mantouvalou. Oxford, 2018. (Philosophical Foundations of Law).
@inbook{7c3c083348d34d5b99dbca8bc9ff7631,
title = "Civic republican political theory and labour law",
abstract = "Several justifications are cited in the academic literature in favour of common law and statutory intervention in the field of labour law. First, there is the traditional ‘inequality of bargaining power’ rationale. This justification shares some commonalities with the second rationale, namely that labour laws are an integral part of the package that must be put in place to prevent the commodification of labour and achieve social justice and a more egalitarian society, in terms of the appropriate distribution of resources and opportunities. Finally, in recent times, the ‘law of the labour market’ school of thought has sought to conceptualise labour law as a discipline in more economic terms, in the sense that it promotes, and ought to promote, a regulated labour market that is well-functioning for the benefit of all. However, these justifications have been criticised for ignoring the realities of the contemporary labour market where increasing numbers of people work outside the confines of standard employment contracts and for even bothering to undertake such a ‘sterile’ exercise as attempting to identify a theoretical explanation for the discipline in the first place. One must therefore ask to what extent traditional justifications for the legal regulation of the employment relationship have become frayed at the edges as a result of changes in underlying political, social, economic and industrial conditions over the past half century. For example, to what extent do such developments render the orthodox rationales outmoded or redundant? In response to this question, a strand of academic literature has emerged which offers alternative theoretical support for the regulation of the work relationship.",
keywords = "common law, labour law",
author = "David Cabrelli and Rebecca Zahn",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "12",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198825272",
series = "Philosophical Foundations of Law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
editor = "Hugh Collins and Gillian Lester and Virginia Mantouvalou",
booktitle = "Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law",

}

Cabrelli, D & Zahn, R 2018, Civic republican political theory and labour law. in H Collins, G Lester & V Mantouvalou (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. Philosophical Foundations of Law, Oxford.

Civic republican political theory and labour law. / Cabrelli, David; Zahn, Rebecca.

Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. ed. / Hugh Collins; Gillian Lester; Virginia Mantouvalou. Oxford, 2018. (Philosophical Foundations of Law).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Civic republican political theory and labour law

AU - Cabrelli, David

AU - Zahn, Rebecca

PY - 2018/12/12

Y1 - 2018/12/12

N2 - Several justifications are cited in the academic literature in favour of common law and statutory intervention in the field of labour law. First, there is the traditional ‘inequality of bargaining power’ rationale. This justification shares some commonalities with the second rationale, namely that labour laws are an integral part of the package that must be put in place to prevent the commodification of labour and achieve social justice and a more egalitarian society, in terms of the appropriate distribution of resources and opportunities. Finally, in recent times, the ‘law of the labour market’ school of thought has sought to conceptualise labour law as a discipline in more economic terms, in the sense that it promotes, and ought to promote, a regulated labour market that is well-functioning for the benefit of all. However, these justifications have been criticised for ignoring the realities of the contemporary labour market where increasing numbers of people work outside the confines of standard employment contracts and for even bothering to undertake such a ‘sterile’ exercise as attempting to identify a theoretical explanation for the discipline in the first place. One must therefore ask to what extent traditional justifications for the legal regulation of the employment relationship have become frayed at the edges as a result of changes in underlying political, social, economic and industrial conditions over the past half century. For example, to what extent do such developments render the orthodox rationales outmoded or redundant? In response to this question, a strand of academic literature has emerged which offers alternative theoretical support for the regulation of the work relationship.

AB - Several justifications are cited in the academic literature in favour of common law and statutory intervention in the field of labour law. First, there is the traditional ‘inequality of bargaining power’ rationale. This justification shares some commonalities with the second rationale, namely that labour laws are an integral part of the package that must be put in place to prevent the commodification of labour and achieve social justice and a more egalitarian society, in terms of the appropriate distribution of resources and opportunities. Finally, in recent times, the ‘law of the labour market’ school of thought has sought to conceptualise labour law as a discipline in more economic terms, in the sense that it promotes, and ought to promote, a regulated labour market that is well-functioning for the benefit of all. However, these justifications have been criticised for ignoring the realities of the contemporary labour market where increasing numbers of people work outside the confines of standard employment contracts and for even bothering to undertake such a ‘sterile’ exercise as attempting to identify a theoretical explanation for the discipline in the first place. One must therefore ask to what extent traditional justifications for the legal regulation of the employment relationship have become frayed at the edges as a result of changes in underlying political, social, economic and industrial conditions over the past half century. For example, to what extent do such developments render the orthodox rationales outmoded or redundant? In response to this question, a strand of academic literature has emerged which offers alternative theoretical support for the regulation of the work relationship.

KW - common law

KW - labour law

UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780198825272

T3 - Philosophical Foundations of Law

BT - Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law

A2 - Collins, Hugh

A2 - Lester, Gillian

A2 - Mantouvalou, Virginia

CY - Oxford

ER -

Cabrelli D, Zahn R. Civic republican political theory and labour law. In Collins H, Lester G, Mantouvalou V, editors, Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. Oxford. 2018. (Philosophical Foundations of Law).