Citizens, users or consumers: the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Policy is important not only because it sets parameters for rules and resources in public services, but also because of the way it positions service professionals and the public in particular roles in relation to one another (Propper 1995; Deacon and Mann 1999; Hoggett 2001; Greener 2002). The roles of professionals will change significantly whether they are meant to be providing a service that treats individual users as consumers of their service in a market relationship, or whether they are meant to be providing professional expertise to more passive clients in monopoly-like provision (Greener and Powell, in press). Equally, constituting the public in relatively passive or active roles in relation to public services changes the nature of the public's relationship to them, and adds or takes away mechanisms by which the public may be able to drive improvement. If I am able to exit from a public provider and move to another if I don't like the service I am receiving, or choose between services, then that will provide a different basis for interacting with that service than if I am expected to negotiate improvement with the public professional I am unhappy with, or campaign with others for the improvement of local services when I find them unsatisfactory (Hirschman 1970). The positioning of public service users in relation to services and to their professionals presents a number of possibilities from the public being constituted extremely actively, where they are given a significant role in improving services, to relative passivity, where mechanisms other than user voice or public engagement have to be found (Le Grand 1997).

    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationConnecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services
    Subtitle of host publicationFrom Knowing to Doing
    Place of PublicationCambridge
    Pages55-73
    Number of pages19
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

    Fingerprint

    Public services
    Expertise
    Resources
    Monopoly
    Exit
    Public engagement
    Positioning
    Professional services

    Cite this

    Greener, I. (2010). Citizens, users or consumers: the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance. In Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services : From Knowing to Doing (pp. 55-73). Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005
    Greener, Ian. / Citizens, users or consumers : the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance. Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services : From Knowing to Doing. Cambridge, 2010. pp. 55-73
    @inbook{8596a1b3d30149d1991b091b5b75efc2,
    title = "Citizens, users or consumers: the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance",
    abstract = "Policy is important not only because it sets parameters for rules and resources in public services, but also because of the way it positions service professionals and the public in particular roles in relation to one another (Propper 1995; Deacon and Mann 1999; Hoggett 2001; Greener 2002). The roles of professionals will change significantly whether they are meant to be providing a service that treats individual users as consumers of their service in a market relationship, or whether they are meant to be providing professional expertise to more passive clients in monopoly-like provision (Greener and Powell, in press). Equally, constituting the public in relatively passive or active roles in relation to public services changes the nature of the public's relationship to them, and adds or takes away mechanisms by which the public may be able to drive improvement. If I am able to exit from a public provider and move to another if I don't like the service I am receiving, or choose between services, then that will provide a different basis for interacting with that service than if I am expected to negotiate improvement with the public professional I am unhappy with, or campaign with others for the improvement of local services when I find them unsatisfactory (Hirschman 1970). The positioning of public service users in relation to services and to their professionals presents a number of possibilities from the public being constituted extremely actively, where they are given a significant role in improving services, to relative passivity, where mechanisms other than user voice or public engagement have to be found (Le Grand 1997).",
    author = "Ian Greener",
    year = "2010",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780521195461",
    pages = "55--73",
    booktitle = "Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services",

    }

    Greener, I 2010, Citizens, users or consumers: the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance. in Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services : From Knowing to Doing. Cambridge, pp. 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005

    Citizens, users or consumers : the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance. / Greener, Ian.

    Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services : From Knowing to Doing. Cambridge, 2010. p. 55-73.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Citizens, users or consumers

    T2 - the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance

    AU - Greener, Ian

    PY - 2010/1/1

    Y1 - 2010/1/1

    N2 - Policy is important not only because it sets parameters for rules and resources in public services, but also because of the way it positions service professionals and the public in particular roles in relation to one another (Propper 1995; Deacon and Mann 1999; Hoggett 2001; Greener 2002). The roles of professionals will change significantly whether they are meant to be providing a service that treats individual users as consumers of their service in a market relationship, or whether they are meant to be providing professional expertise to more passive clients in monopoly-like provision (Greener and Powell, in press). Equally, constituting the public in relatively passive or active roles in relation to public services changes the nature of the public's relationship to them, and adds or takes away mechanisms by which the public may be able to drive improvement. If I am able to exit from a public provider and move to another if I don't like the service I am receiving, or choose between services, then that will provide a different basis for interacting with that service than if I am expected to negotiate improvement with the public professional I am unhappy with, or campaign with others for the improvement of local services when I find them unsatisfactory (Hirschman 1970). The positioning of public service users in relation to services and to their professionals presents a number of possibilities from the public being constituted extremely actively, where they are given a significant role in improving services, to relative passivity, where mechanisms other than user voice or public engagement have to be found (Le Grand 1997).

    AB - Policy is important not only because it sets parameters for rules and resources in public services, but also because of the way it positions service professionals and the public in particular roles in relation to one another (Propper 1995; Deacon and Mann 1999; Hoggett 2001; Greener 2002). The roles of professionals will change significantly whether they are meant to be providing a service that treats individual users as consumers of their service in a market relationship, or whether they are meant to be providing professional expertise to more passive clients in monopoly-like provision (Greener and Powell, in press). Equally, constituting the public in relatively passive or active roles in relation to public services changes the nature of the public's relationship to them, and adds or takes away mechanisms by which the public may be able to drive improvement. If I am able to exit from a public provider and move to another if I don't like the service I am receiving, or choose between services, then that will provide a different basis for interacting with that service than if I am expected to negotiate improvement with the public professional I am unhappy with, or campaign with others for the improvement of local services when I find them unsatisfactory (Hirschman 1970). The positioning of public service users in relation to services and to their professionals presents a number of possibilities from the public being constituted extremely actively, where they are given a significant role in improving services, to relative passivity, where mechanisms other than user voice or public engagement have to be found (Le Grand 1997).

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926084419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780521195461

    SP - 55

    EP - 73

    BT - Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services

    CY - Cambridge

    ER -

    Greener I. Citizens, users or consumers: the voice of the public and its influence on improving performance. In Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services : From Knowing to Doing. Cambridge. 2010. p. 55-73 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762000.005