Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges: evidence from Ireland

Robert Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The linkage between what parties promise during election campaigns and what governments deliver afterward is central to democratic theory. Research on this linkage concludes that there is a higher level of congruence between campaign promises and government actions than suggested by the conventional wisdom. This study is the first to describe and explain citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges in a way that is comparable with political scientists’ evaluations. The explanation of variation in citizens’ evaluations combines an objective factor, namely actual policy performance, and subjective factors, namely party identification, information resources, trust in political parties, and personal experience. The explanation is tested with panel data containing a unique set of questions on public opinion in Ireland. Actual policy performance is the most important factor affecting citizens’ evaluations. However, subjective factors often cause citizens’ evaluations to be more negative than actual policy performance suggests they should be.
LanguageEnglish
Pages187-201
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Ireland
election
citizen
evaluation
evidence
performance
election campaign
political scientist
wisdom
public opinion
campaign
cause
resources
experience

Keywords

  • public opinion
  • citizens evaluations
  • election pledges
  • ireland

Cite this

@article{523fedc3d70641879d2215b456ff8cf9,
title = "Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges: evidence from Ireland",
abstract = "The linkage between what parties promise during election campaigns and what governments deliver afterward is central to democratic theory. Research on this linkage concludes that there is a higher level of congruence between campaign promises and government actions than suggested by the conventional wisdom. This study is the first to describe and explain citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges in a way that is comparable with political scientists’ evaluations. The explanation of variation in citizens’ evaluations combines an objective factor, namely actual policy performance, and subjective factors, namely party identification, information resources, trust in political parties, and personal experience. The explanation is tested with panel data containing a unique set of questions on public opinion in Ireland. Actual policy performance is the most important factor affecting citizens’ evaluations. However, subjective factors often cause citizens’ evaluations to be more negative than actual policy performance suggests they should be.",
keywords = "public opinion , citizens evaluations, election pledges, ireland",
author = "Robert Thomson",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0022381610000952",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "187--201",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
number = "1",

}

Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges : evidence from Ireland. / Thomson, Robert.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 187-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges

T2 - Journal of Politics

AU - Thomson, Robert

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - The linkage between what parties promise during election campaigns and what governments deliver afterward is central to democratic theory. Research on this linkage concludes that there is a higher level of congruence between campaign promises and government actions than suggested by the conventional wisdom. This study is the first to describe and explain citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges in a way that is comparable with political scientists’ evaluations. The explanation of variation in citizens’ evaluations combines an objective factor, namely actual policy performance, and subjective factors, namely party identification, information resources, trust in political parties, and personal experience. The explanation is tested with panel data containing a unique set of questions on public opinion in Ireland. Actual policy performance is the most important factor affecting citizens’ evaluations. However, subjective factors often cause citizens’ evaluations to be more negative than actual policy performance suggests they should be.

AB - The linkage between what parties promise during election campaigns and what governments deliver afterward is central to democratic theory. Research on this linkage concludes that there is a higher level of congruence between campaign promises and government actions than suggested by the conventional wisdom. This study is the first to describe and explain citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges in a way that is comparable with political scientists’ evaluations. The explanation of variation in citizens’ evaluations combines an objective factor, namely actual policy performance, and subjective factors, namely party identification, information resources, trust in political parties, and personal experience. The explanation is tested with panel data containing a unique set of questions on public opinion in Ireland. Actual policy performance is the most important factor affecting citizens’ evaluations. However, subjective factors often cause citizens’ evaluations to be more negative than actual policy performance suggests they should be.

KW - public opinion

KW - citizens evaluations

KW - election pledges

KW - ireland

U2 - 10.1017/S0022381610000952

DO - 10.1017/S0022381610000952

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 187

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 1

ER -