Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges: evidence from Ireland

Robert Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The linkage between what parties promise during election campaigns and what governments deliver afterward is central to democratic theory. Research on this linkage concludes that there is a higher level of congruence between campaign promises and government actions than suggested by the conventional wisdom. This study is the first to describe and explain citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges in a way that is comparable with political scientists’ evaluations. The explanation of variation in citizens’ evaluations combines an objective factor, namely actual policy performance, and subjective factors, namely party identification, information resources, trust in political parties, and personal experience. The explanation is tested with panel data containing a unique set of questions on public opinion in Ireland. Actual policy performance is the most important factor affecting citizens’ evaluations. However, subjective factors often cause citizens’ evaluations to be more negative than actual policy performance suggests they should be.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-201
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • public opinion
  • citizens evaluations
  • election pledges
  • ireland

Cite this