Challenging thinking about the relationship between school physical education and sports performance

David Kirk, Trish Gorely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between school physical education and sports performance. Traditional ways of thinking about this relationship (e.g. pyramids, foundation stones and trickle-down effects) are critiqued. It is suggested that these ways of thinking are problematic in their logic, their exclusionary nature and their positioning of physical education. A more inclusive way of thinking about the relationship is presented. The alternative model is based on four components: clearly articulated pathways, the use of modified games and sports, teacher and coach education, and policy development. It is argued that this alternative brings physical education and sport performance into a sensible and productive relationship which meets the needs of the general population for quality physical education while at the same time meeting the needs of sport performance across the lifespan.
LanguageEnglish
Pages119-133
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Physical Education Review
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Athletic Performance
Physical Education and Training
physical education
Sports
school
performance
sports teacher
Policy Making
life-span
coach
development policy
Population
education

Keywords

  • physical education
  • sport science
  • pyramid model

Cite this

@article{75a7319a0a034e8784cf685d475ece89,
title = "Challenging thinking about the relationship between school physical education and sports performance",
abstract = "This paper examines the relationship between school physical education and sports performance. Traditional ways of thinking about this relationship (e.g. pyramids, foundation stones and trickle-down effects) are critiqued. It is suggested that these ways of thinking are problematic in their logic, their exclusionary nature and their positioning of physical education. A more inclusive way of thinking about the relationship is presented. The alternative model is based on four components: clearly articulated pathways, the use of modified games and sports, teacher and coach education, and policy development. It is argued that this alternative brings physical education and sport performance into a sensible and productive relationship which meets the needs of the general population for quality physical education while at the same time meeting the needs of sport performance across the lifespan.",
keywords = "physical education, sport science, pyramid model",
author = "David Kirk and Trish Gorely",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1356336X000062002",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "119--133",
journal = "European Physical Education Review",
issn = "1356-336X",
number = "2",

}

Challenging thinking about the relationship between school physical education and sports performance. / Kirk, David; Gorely, Trish.

In: European Physical Education Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.2000, p. 119-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging thinking about the relationship between school physical education and sports performance

AU - Kirk, David

AU - Gorely, Trish

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - This paper examines the relationship between school physical education and sports performance. Traditional ways of thinking about this relationship (e.g. pyramids, foundation stones and trickle-down effects) are critiqued. It is suggested that these ways of thinking are problematic in their logic, their exclusionary nature and their positioning of physical education. A more inclusive way of thinking about the relationship is presented. The alternative model is based on four components: clearly articulated pathways, the use of modified games and sports, teacher and coach education, and policy development. It is argued that this alternative brings physical education and sport performance into a sensible and productive relationship which meets the needs of the general population for quality physical education while at the same time meeting the needs of sport performance across the lifespan.

AB - This paper examines the relationship between school physical education and sports performance. Traditional ways of thinking about this relationship (e.g. pyramids, foundation stones and trickle-down effects) are critiqued. It is suggested that these ways of thinking are problematic in their logic, their exclusionary nature and their positioning of physical education. A more inclusive way of thinking about the relationship is presented. The alternative model is based on four components: clearly articulated pathways, the use of modified games and sports, teacher and coach education, and policy development. It is argued that this alternative brings physical education and sport performance into a sensible and productive relationship which meets the needs of the general population for quality physical education while at the same time meeting the needs of sport performance across the lifespan.

KW - physical education

KW - sport science

KW - pyramid model

UR - http://epe.sagepub.com/

U2 - 10.1177/1356336X000062002

DO - 10.1177/1356336X000062002

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 119

EP - 133

JO - European Physical Education Review

T2 - European Physical Education Review

JF - European Physical Education Review

SN - 1356-336X

IS - 2

ER -