Challenges to information retrieval - a global solution?

C. Colston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Monopolies over raw information, particularly sole-source information, could have serious implications. The European sui generis database right illustrates the potential for such a monopoly. This paper also seeks to demonstrate that this is also a wider issue. Technology can facilitate almost total access to digitally stored information, but paradoxically the law has been developing a potential to give right owners the capacity to control that access. This is an aspect of both the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Copyright in the Information Society Directive. Leaving any 'right' of access to the laws of competition may be an inadequate response to the protection/access conundrum at the heart of copyright law. Three other mechanisms might be employed: compulsory licences, a 'copy-duty', or expanded exceptions to copyright and database right. The current review of the Database Directive by the Commission seems unlikely to reconsider the application of compulsory licences to the right. Modifying the rights' exceptions may better facilitate a carefully tailored balance between protection and justifiable access. This paper suggests a WIPO Information Treaty and Tribunal (incorporating the results of WIPO commissioned studies) to address these issues. It could be a positive and cohesive strategy globally, harmonizing the means of access to information without eroding incentives for collating that data.
LanguageEnglish
Pages294-326
Number of pages32
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

information retrieval
monopoly
license
Law
information society
treaty
incentive
act

Keywords

  • information law
  • copyright law
  • database law

Cite this

@article{a94d16f1f1164c908717edc249ee20a0,
title = "Challenges to information retrieval - a global solution?",
abstract = "Monopolies over raw information, particularly sole-source information, could have serious implications. The European sui generis database right illustrates the potential for such a monopoly. This paper also seeks to demonstrate that this is also a wider issue. Technology can facilitate almost total access to digitally stored information, but paradoxically the law has been developing a potential to give right owners the capacity to control that access. This is an aspect of both the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Copyright in the Information Society Directive. Leaving any 'right' of access to the laws of competition may be an inadequate response to the protection/access conundrum at the heart of copyright law. Three other mechanisms might be employed: compulsory licences, a 'copy-duty', or expanded exceptions to copyright and database right. The current review of the Database Directive by the Commission seems unlikely to reconsider the application of compulsory licences to the right. Modifying the rights' exceptions may better facilitate a carefully tailored balance between protection and justifiable access. This paper suggests a WIPO Information Treaty and Tribunal (incorporating the results of WIPO commissioned studies) to address these issues. It could be a positive and cohesive strategy globally, harmonizing the means of access to information without eroding incentives for collating that data.",
keywords = "information law, copyright law, database law",
author = "C. Colston",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1093/ijlit/10.3.294",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "294--326",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Information Technology",
issn = "0967-0769",
number = "3",

}

Challenges to information retrieval - a global solution? / Colston, C.

In: International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2002, p. 294-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges to information retrieval - a global solution?

AU - Colston, C.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Monopolies over raw information, particularly sole-source information, could have serious implications. The European sui generis database right illustrates the potential for such a monopoly. This paper also seeks to demonstrate that this is also a wider issue. Technology can facilitate almost total access to digitally stored information, but paradoxically the law has been developing a potential to give right owners the capacity to control that access. This is an aspect of both the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Copyright in the Information Society Directive. Leaving any 'right' of access to the laws of competition may be an inadequate response to the protection/access conundrum at the heart of copyright law. Three other mechanisms might be employed: compulsory licences, a 'copy-duty', or expanded exceptions to copyright and database right. The current review of the Database Directive by the Commission seems unlikely to reconsider the application of compulsory licences to the right. Modifying the rights' exceptions may better facilitate a carefully tailored balance between protection and justifiable access. This paper suggests a WIPO Information Treaty and Tribunal (incorporating the results of WIPO commissioned studies) to address these issues. It could be a positive and cohesive strategy globally, harmonizing the means of access to information without eroding incentives for collating that data.

AB - Monopolies over raw information, particularly sole-source information, could have serious implications. The European sui generis database right illustrates the potential for such a monopoly. This paper also seeks to demonstrate that this is also a wider issue. Technology can facilitate almost total access to digitally stored information, but paradoxically the law has been developing a potential to give right owners the capacity to control that access. This is an aspect of both the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Copyright in the Information Society Directive. Leaving any 'right' of access to the laws of competition may be an inadequate response to the protection/access conundrum at the heart of copyright law. Three other mechanisms might be employed: compulsory licences, a 'copy-duty', or expanded exceptions to copyright and database right. The current review of the Database Directive by the Commission seems unlikely to reconsider the application of compulsory licences to the right. Modifying the rights' exceptions may better facilitate a carefully tailored balance between protection and justifiable access. This paper suggests a WIPO Information Treaty and Tribunal (incorporating the results of WIPO commissioned studies) to address these issues. It could be a positive and cohesive strategy globally, harmonizing the means of access to information without eroding incentives for collating that data.

KW - information law

KW - copyright law

KW - database law

UR - http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/10.3.294

U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/10.3.294

DO - 10.1093/ijlit/10.3.294

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 294

EP - 326

JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

T2 - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

SN - 0967-0769

IS - 3

ER -