Challenges and benefits in implementing shared inter-agency assessment across the UK: a literature review

Emma Miller, Kirsteen Cameron

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Over the past 10 years, each of the four countries in the UK has attempted to resolve continuing difficulties with duplication of assessment and lack of shared information in community care, by developing approaches to shared assessment. Relevant literature reviews have previously focused on challenges to partnership working between health and social care, and on different approaches to assessment. The literature review described here differs in three key respects. Firstly, the literature was selected on the basis that it addressed shared assessment specifically. Secondly, it included evidence from the four countries within the UK, providing a cross-national basis to the evidence. Thirdly, this study was undertaken to identify whether benefits from shared assessment were evident, in addition to the challenges. While the evidence of benefits at this stage is relatively limited, it is clear that some have emerged, including two relating directly to relevant policy objectives: improved communication, service user and carer involvement; improved partnership and joined up working. As approaches to shared assessment are currently under review in Scotland, England and Wales, and implementation underway in Northern Ireland, and in light of the economic recession and demographic challenges, consideration of key aspects of the evidence may be timely.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages39-45
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Economic Recession
    Northern Ireland
    Wales
    Scotland
    England
    Caregivers
    Communication
    Demography
    Delivery of Health Care

    Keywords

    • inter-professional
    • inter-agency assessment
    • health and social care
    • shared assessment

    Cite this

    @article{8b0a69fafba44bf4a4deb2af2581f085,
    title = "Challenges and benefits in implementing shared inter-agency assessment across the UK: a literature review",
    abstract = "Over the past 10 years, each of the four countries in the UK has attempted to resolve continuing difficulties with duplication of assessment and lack of shared information in community care, by developing approaches to shared assessment. Relevant literature reviews have previously focused on challenges to partnership working between health and social care, and on different approaches to assessment. The literature review described here differs in three key respects. Firstly, the literature was selected on the basis that it addressed shared assessment specifically. Secondly, it included evidence from the four countries within the UK, providing a cross-national basis to the evidence. Thirdly, this study was undertaken to identify whether benefits from shared assessment were evident, in addition to the challenges. While the evidence of benefits at this stage is relatively limited, it is clear that some have emerged, including two relating directly to relevant policy objectives: improved communication, service user and carer involvement; improved partnership and joined up working. As approaches to shared assessment are currently under review in Scotland, England and Wales, and implementation underway in Northern Ireland, and in light of the economic recession and demographic challenges, consideration of key aspects of the evidence may be timely.",
    keywords = "inter-professional, inter-agency assessment , health and social care , shared assessment",
    author = "Emma Miller and Kirsteen Cameron",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.3109/13561820.2010.497749",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "39--45",
    journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Care",
    issn = "1356-1820",
    number = "1",

    }

    Challenges and benefits in implementing shared inter-agency assessment across the UK : a literature review. / Miller, Emma; Cameron , Kirsteen .

    In: Journal of Interprofessional Care , Vol. 25, No. 1, 2011, p. 39-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Challenges and benefits in implementing shared inter-agency assessment across the UK

    T2 - Journal of Interprofessional Care

    AU - Miller, Emma

    AU - Cameron , Kirsteen

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Over the past 10 years, each of the four countries in the UK has attempted to resolve continuing difficulties with duplication of assessment and lack of shared information in community care, by developing approaches to shared assessment. Relevant literature reviews have previously focused on challenges to partnership working between health and social care, and on different approaches to assessment. The literature review described here differs in three key respects. Firstly, the literature was selected on the basis that it addressed shared assessment specifically. Secondly, it included evidence from the four countries within the UK, providing a cross-national basis to the evidence. Thirdly, this study was undertaken to identify whether benefits from shared assessment were evident, in addition to the challenges. While the evidence of benefits at this stage is relatively limited, it is clear that some have emerged, including two relating directly to relevant policy objectives: improved communication, service user and carer involvement; improved partnership and joined up working. As approaches to shared assessment are currently under review in Scotland, England and Wales, and implementation underway in Northern Ireland, and in light of the economic recession and demographic challenges, consideration of key aspects of the evidence may be timely.

    AB - Over the past 10 years, each of the four countries in the UK has attempted to resolve continuing difficulties with duplication of assessment and lack of shared information in community care, by developing approaches to shared assessment. Relevant literature reviews have previously focused on challenges to partnership working between health and social care, and on different approaches to assessment. The literature review described here differs in three key respects. Firstly, the literature was selected on the basis that it addressed shared assessment specifically. Secondly, it included evidence from the four countries within the UK, providing a cross-national basis to the evidence. Thirdly, this study was undertaken to identify whether benefits from shared assessment were evident, in addition to the challenges. While the evidence of benefits at this stage is relatively limited, it is clear that some have emerged, including two relating directly to relevant policy objectives: improved communication, service user and carer involvement; improved partnership and joined up working. As approaches to shared assessment are currently under review in Scotland, England and Wales, and implementation underway in Northern Ireland, and in light of the economic recession and demographic challenges, consideration of key aspects of the evidence may be timely.

    KW - inter-professional

    KW - inter-agency assessment

    KW - health and social care

    KW - shared assessment

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650024925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20795832

    U2 - 10.3109/13561820.2010.497749

    DO - 10.3109/13561820.2010.497749

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 39

    EP - 45

    JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care

    JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care

    SN - 1356-1820

    IS - 1

    ER -