CFD study of jet impingement test erosion using Ansys Fluent ® and OpenFoam ®

Alejandro Lopez, William Nicholls, Matthew Stickland, William Dempster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The initial aim of this study was to compare OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent in order to verify OpenFoam's Lagrangian Library and erosion capabilities. However, it was found that previous versions of Fluent have been providing wrong results for the discrete phase and the differences with the latest version (Ansys Fluent 15) are shown. A Submerged Jet Impingement Test is an effective method for studying erosion created by solid particles entrained in a liquid. When considering low particle concentrations a Lagrangian modeling of the particulate phase is a reasonable approach. Proper linkage between OpenFOAM's Lagrangian library and the solver PimpleFoam for incompressible transient flows allows two-phase simulations to be undertaken for comparison with Ansys Fluent with the aim of verifying OpenFoam's accuracy. Steady state convergence for the fluid flow is first accomplished and the results are compared, confirming a good agreement between the two packages. A transient simulation was then set up and spherical particles incorporated into the fluid flow. An assessment of the two codes' discrete phase models was carried out, focusing on the differences between impact angles and velocities yielded at the impingement plate's surface employing a similar strategy to that outlined first by Hattori et al [1] and later by Gnanavelu et al. in [2, 3]. In the comparison of OpenFoam with the latest version of Fluent, the main differences between the injection models are highlighted and the coupling possibilities between phases are taken into consideration. Agreement between trends for both impact angles and velocities is satisfactory when the last version of the commercial package is considered and the average discrepancy between numeric values is very low, verifying OpenFoam's Lagrangian library. Two different Jet Impingement Test configurations are also compared and the differences highlighted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages88-95
Number of pages8
JournalComputer Physics Communications
Volume197
Early online date11 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

jet impingement
charge flow devices
erosion
Erosion
Computational fluid dynamics
Flow of fluids
fluid flow
Two phase flow
impingement
two phase flow
linkages
particulates
simulation
Liquids
injection
trends
liquids
configurations

Keywords

  • Fluent
  • OpenFOAM
  • multiphase flow
  • discrete phase model
  • erosion
  • jet impingement test

Cite this

@article{4f30717d42154715916d3224c9bc825e,
title = "CFD study of jet impingement test erosion using Ansys Fluent {\circledR} and OpenFoam {\circledR}",
abstract = "The initial aim of this study was to compare OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent in order to verify OpenFoam's Lagrangian Library and erosion capabilities. However, it was found that previous versions of Fluent have been providing wrong results for the discrete phase and the differences with the latest version (Ansys Fluent 15) are shown. A Submerged Jet Impingement Test is an effective method for studying erosion created by solid particles entrained in a liquid. When considering low particle concentrations a Lagrangian modeling of the particulate phase is a reasonable approach. Proper linkage between OpenFOAM's Lagrangian library and the solver PimpleFoam for incompressible transient flows allows two-phase simulations to be undertaken for comparison with Ansys Fluent with the aim of verifying OpenFoam's accuracy. Steady state convergence for the fluid flow is first accomplished and the results are compared, confirming a good agreement between the two packages. A transient simulation was then set up and spherical particles incorporated into the fluid flow. An assessment of the two codes' discrete phase models was carried out, focusing on the differences between impact angles and velocities yielded at the impingement plate's surface employing a similar strategy to that outlined first by Hattori et al [1] and later by Gnanavelu et al. in [2, 3]. In the comparison of OpenFoam with the latest version of Fluent, the main differences between the injection models are highlighted and the coupling possibilities between phases are taken into consideration. Agreement between trends for both impact angles and velocities is satisfactory when the last version of the commercial package is considered and the average discrepancy between numeric values is very low, verifying OpenFoam's Lagrangian library. Two different Jet Impingement Test configurations are also compared and the differences highlighted.",
keywords = "Fluent, OpenFOAM, multiphase flow, discrete phase model, erosion, jet impingement test",
author = "Alejandro Lopez and William Nicholls and Matthew Stickland and William Dempster",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "197",
pages = "88--95",
journal = "Computer Physics Communications",
issn = "0010-4655",

}

CFD study of jet impingement test erosion using Ansys Fluent ® and OpenFoam ®. / Lopez, Alejandro; Nicholls, William; Stickland, Matthew; Dempster, William.

In: Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 197, 12.2015, p. 88-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - CFD study of jet impingement test erosion using Ansys Fluent ® and OpenFoam ®

AU - Lopez, Alejandro

AU - Nicholls, William

AU - Stickland, Matthew

AU - Dempster, William

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - The initial aim of this study was to compare OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent in order to verify OpenFoam's Lagrangian Library and erosion capabilities. However, it was found that previous versions of Fluent have been providing wrong results for the discrete phase and the differences with the latest version (Ansys Fluent 15) are shown. A Submerged Jet Impingement Test is an effective method for studying erosion created by solid particles entrained in a liquid. When considering low particle concentrations a Lagrangian modeling of the particulate phase is a reasonable approach. Proper linkage between OpenFOAM's Lagrangian library and the solver PimpleFoam for incompressible transient flows allows two-phase simulations to be undertaken for comparison with Ansys Fluent with the aim of verifying OpenFoam's accuracy. Steady state convergence for the fluid flow is first accomplished and the results are compared, confirming a good agreement between the two packages. A transient simulation was then set up and spherical particles incorporated into the fluid flow. An assessment of the two codes' discrete phase models was carried out, focusing on the differences between impact angles and velocities yielded at the impingement plate's surface employing a similar strategy to that outlined first by Hattori et al [1] and later by Gnanavelu et al. in [2, 3]. In the comparison of OpenFoam with the latest version of Fluent, the main differences between the injection models are highlighted and the coupling possibilities between phases are taken into consideration. Agreement between trends for both impact angles and velocities is satisfactory when the last version of the commercial package is considered and the average discrepancy between numeric values is very low, verifying OpenFoam's Lagrangian library. Two different Jet Impingement Test configurations are also compared and the differences highlighted.

AB - The initial aim of this study was to compare OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent in order to verify OpenFoam's Lagrangian Library and erosion capabilities. However, it was found that previous versions of Fluent have been providing wrong results for the discrete phase and the differences with the latest version (Ansys Fluent 15) are shown. A Submerged Jet Impingement Test is an effective method for studying erosion created by solid particles entrained in a liquid. When considering low particle concentrations a Lagrangian modeling of the particulate phase is a reasonable approach. Proper linkage between OpenFOAM's Lagrangian library and the solver PimpleFoam for incompressible transient flows allows two-phase simulations to be undertaken for comparison with Ansys Fluent with the aim of verifying OpenFoam's accuracy. Steady state convergence for the fluid flow is first accomplished and the results are compared, confirming a good agreement between the two packages. A transient simulation was then set up and spherical particles incorporated into the fluid flow. An assessment of the two codes' discrete phase models was carried out, focusing on the differences between impact angles and velocities yielded at the impingement plate's surface employing a similar strategy to that outlined first by Hattori et al [1] and later by Gnanavelu et al. in [2, 3]. In the comparison of OpenFoam with the latest version of Fluent, the main differences between the injection models are highlighted and the coupling possibilities between phases are taken into consideration. Agreement between trends for both impact angles and velocities is satisfactory when the last version of the commercial package is considered and the average discrepancy between numeric values is very low, verifying OpenFoam's Lagrangian library. Two different Jet Impingement Test configurations are also compared and the differences highlighted.

KW - Fluent

KW - OpenFOAM

KW - multiphase flow

KW - discrete phase model

KW - erosion

KW - jet impingement test

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465515002945

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.016

M3 - Article

VL - 197

SP - 88

EP - 95

JO - Computer Physics Communications

T2 - Computer Physics Communications

JF - Computer Physics Communications

SN - 0010-4655

ER -