Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures

Stephen Jannetts, Anja Lowit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate the validity of cepstral analyses against other conventional acoustic measures of voice quality in determining the perceptual impression in different motor speech disorders—hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria, and speech tasks—prolonged vowels and connected speech. Prolonged vowel productions and connected speech samples (reading passages and monologues) from 43 participants with Parkinson disease and 10 speakers with ataxia were analyzed perceptually by a trained listener using GRBAS. In addition, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), smoothed CPP (CPPs), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer %, shimmer dB, amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), jitter, and pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ) were performed. Statistical analysis involved correlations between perceptual and acoustic measures, as well as determination of differences across speaker groups and elicitation tasks. CPP and CPPs results showed greater levels of correlation with overall dysphonia, breathiness, and asthenia ratings than the other acoustic measures, except in the case of roughness. Sustained vowel production produced a higher number of significant correlations across all parameters other than connected speech, but task choice did not affect CPP and CPPs results. There were no significant differences in any parameters across the two speaker groups. The results of this study are consistent with the results of other studies investigating the same measures in speakers with nonmotor-related voice pathologies. In addition, there was an indication that they performed better in relation to asthenia, which might be particularly relevant for the current speaker group. The results support the clinical and research use of CPP and CPPs as a quantitative measure of voice quality in populations with motor speech disorder.
LanguageEnglish
Pages673-680
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Voice
Volume28
Issue number6
Early online date16 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Voice Quality
Speech Disorders
Asthenia
Dysphonia
Dysarthria
Ataxia
Noise
Reading
Pathology
3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid
Research
Population
Motor Disorders

Keywords

  • cepstral analysis
  • hypokinetic
  • ataxic voices
  • Voice disorders
  • motor speech disorders
  • acoustic analysis
  • cepstral measures

Cite this

@article{6d236e97573740dc8469d45891300c98,
title = "Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures",
abstract = "To investigate the validity of cepstral analyses against other conventional acoustic measures of voice quality in determining the perceptual impression in different motor speech disorders—hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria, and speech tasks—prolonged vowels and connected speech. Prolonged vowel productions and connected speech samples (reading passages and monologues) from 43 participants with Parkinson disease and 10 speakers with ataxia were analyzed perceptually by a trained listener using GRBAS. In addition, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), smoothed CPP (CPPs), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer {\%}, shimmer dB, amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), jitter, and pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ) were performed. Statistical analysis involved correlations between perceptual and acoustic measures, as well as determination of differences across speaker groups and elicitation tasks. CPP and CPPs results showed greater levels of correlation with overall dysphonia, breathiness, and asthenia ratings than the other acoustic measures, except in the case of roughness. Sustained vowel production produced a higher number of significant correlations across all parameters other than connected speech, but task choice did not affect CPP and CPPs results. There were no significant differences in any parameters across the two speaker groups. The results of this study are consistent with the results of other studies investigating the same measures in speakers with nonmotor-related voice pathologies. In addition, there was an indication that they performed better in relation to asthenia, which might be particularly relevant for the current speaker group. The results support the clinical and research use of CPP and CPPs as a quantitative measure of voice quality in populations with motor speech disorder.",
keywords = "cepstral analysis, hypokinetic, ataxic voices, Voice disorders, motor speech disorders, acoustic analysis, cepstral measures",
author = "Stephen Jannetts and Anja Lowit",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.013",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "673--680",
journal = "Journal of Voice",
issn = "0892-1997",
number = "6",

}

Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices : correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. / Jannetts, Stephen; Lowit, Anja.

In: Journal of Voice, Vol. 28, No. 6, 11.2014, p. 673-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices

T2 - Journal of Voice

AU - Jannetts, Stephen

AU - Lowit, Anja

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - To investigate the validity of cepstral analyses against other conventional acoustic measures of voice quality in determining the perceptual impression in different motor speech disorders—hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria, and speech tasks—prolonged vowels and connected speech. Prolonged vowel productions and connected speech samples (reading passages and monologues) from 43 participants with Parkinson disease and 10 speakers with ataxia were analyzed perceptually by a trained listener using GRBAS. In addition, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), smoothed CPP (CPPs), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer %, shimmer dB, amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), jitter, and pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ) were performed. Statistical analysis involved correlations between perceptual and acoustic measures, as well as determination of differences across speaker groups and elicitation tasks. CPP and CPPs results showed greater levels of correlation with overall dysphonia, breathiness, and asthenia ratings than the other acoustic measures, except in the case of roughness. Sustained vowel production produced a higher number of significant correlations across all parameters other than connected speech, but task choice did not affect CPP and CPPs results. There were no significant differences in any parameters across the two speaker groups. The results of this study are consistent with the results of other studies investigating the same measures in speakers with nonmotor-related voice pathologies. In addition, there was an indication that they performed better in relation to asthenia, which might be particularly relevant for the current speaker group. The results support the clinical and research use of CPP and CPPs as a quantitative measure of voice quality in populations with motor speech disorder.

AB - To investigate the validity of cepstral analyses against other conventional acoustic measures of voice quality in determining the perceptual impression in different motor speech disorders—hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria, and speech tasks—prolonged vowels and connected speech. Prolonged vowel productions and connected speech samples (reading passages and monologues) from 43 participants with Parkinson disease and 10 speakers with ataxia were analyzed perceptually by a trained listener using GRBAS. In addition, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), smoothed CPP (CPPs), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer %, shimmer dB, amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), jitter, and pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ) were performed. Statistical analysis involved correlations between perceptual and acoustic measures, as well as determination of differences across speaker groups and elicitation tasks. CPP and CPPs results showed greater levels of correlation with overall dysphonia, breathiness, and asthenia ratings than the other acoustic measures, except in the case of roughness. Sustained vowel production produced a higher number of significant correlations across all parameters other than connected speech, but task choice did not affect CPP and CPPs results. There were no significant differences in any parameters across the two speaker groups. The results of this study are consistent with the results of other studies investigating the same measures in speakers with nonmotor-related voice pathologies. In addition, there was an indication that they performed better in relation to asthenia, which might be particularly relevant for the current speaker group. The results support the clinical and research use of CPP and CPPs as a quantitative measure of voice quality in populations with motor speech disorder.

KW - cepstral analysis

KW - hypokinetic

KW - ataxic voices

KW - Voice disorders

KW - motor speech disorders

KW - acoustic analysis

KW - cepstral measures

UR - http://www.jvoice.org/home

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.013

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 673

EP - 680

JO - Journal of Voice

JF - Journal of Voice

SN - 0892-1997

IS - 6

ER -