Causal maps and the evaluation of decision

V. Belton, G. Montbelier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Causal maps are widely employed in problem-structuring interventions. They permit a rich representation of ideas, through the modelling of complex chains of argument as networks. The last stage of a problem-structuring intervention is often to identify and agree to a set of potential strategic options. In some circumstances the preferred direction may emerge naturally from a process of negotiation; in others further, more-or-less formal, analysis to evaluate the options and to understand their impacts on the goals could be helpful. Such analysis may help to bring closure to the process. The main aim of this paper is to review systematically the approaches for evaluating options following from the use of a causal map for problem structuring; some directly using the map structure, others working with concepts extracted from, or an external model derived from, the map. Following a proposed taxonomy, each approach is presented, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages779-791
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume57
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Taxonomies
Problem structuring
Causal maps
Evaluation
Taxonomy
Modeling
Strategic options
Disadvantage
Closure

Keywords

  • cognitive mapping
  • causal maps
  • operational research
  • management theory

Cite this

@article{629af2d763034d8ca62d9f60af7ac80f,
title = "Causal maps and the evaluation of decision",
abstract = "Causal maps are widely employed in problem-structuring interventions. They permit a rich representation of ideas, through the modelling of complex chains of argument as networks. The last stage of a problem-structuring intervention is often to identify and agree to a set of potential strategic options. In some circumstances the preferred direction may emerge naturally from a process of negotiation; in others further, more-or-less formal, analysis to evaluate the options and to understand their impacts on the goals could be helpful. Such analysis may help to bring closure to the process. The main aim of this paper is to review systematically the approaches for evaluating options following from the use of a causal map for problem structuring; some directly using the map structure, others working with concepts extracted from, or an external model derived from, the map. Following a proposed taxonomy, each approach is presented, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed.",
keywords = "cognitive mapping, causal maps, operational research, management theory",
author = "V. Belton and G. Montbelier",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602214",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "779--791",
journal = "Journal of Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",
number = "7",

}

Causal maps and the evaluation of decision. / Belton, V.; Montbelier, G.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57, No. 7, 2006, p. 779-791.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causal maps and the evaluation of decision

AU - Belton, V.

AU - Montbelier, G.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Causal maps are widely employed in problem-structuring interventions. They permit a rich representation of ideas, through the modelling of complex chains of argument as networks. The last stage of a problem-structuring intervention is often to identify and agree to a set of potential strategic options. In some circumstances the preferred direction may emerge naturally from a process of negotiation; in others further, more-or-less formal, analysis to evaluate the options and to understand their impacts on the goals could be helpful. Such analysis may help to bring closure to the process. The main aim of this paper is to review systematically the approaches for evaluating options following from the use of a causal map for problem structuring; some directly using the map structure, others working with concepts extracted from, or an external model derived from, the map. Following a proposed taxonomy, each approach is presented, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

AB - Causal maps are widely employed in problem-structuring interventions. They permit a rich representation of ideas, through the modelling of complex chains of argument as networks. The last stage of a problem-structuring intervention is often to identify and agree to a set of potential strategic options. In some circumstances the preferred direction may emerge naturally from a process of negotiation; in others further, more-or-less formal, analysis to evaluate the options and to understand their impacts on the goals could be helpful. Such analysis may help to bring closure to the process. The main aim of this paper is to review systematically the approaches for evaluating options following from the use of a causal map for problem structuring; some directly using the map structure, others working with concepts extracted from, or an external model derived from, the map. Following a proposed taxonomy, each approach is presented, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

KW - cognitive mapping

KW - causal maps

KW - operational research

KW - management theory

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602214

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602214

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602214

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 779

EP - 791

JO - Journal of Operational Research Society

T2 - Journal of Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

IS - 7

ER -