Carbon pricing and the 1.5°C target

near-term decarbonisation and the importance of an instrument mix

Michael Mehling, Endre Tvinnereim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Carbon pricing is routinely presented as the most efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore as an indispensable pillar of ambitious climate policy. For incremental emission reductions on the margin, this static perspective may be correct, expressing the ability of carbon pricing to identify and spur abatement options with the lowest cost. At the same time, meeting the 1.5°C target requires achievement of zero net emissions in the relatively near term, implying a need for full decarbonisation rather than marginal abatement. To date, there is only limited empirical evidence suggesting that carbon pricing has produced deep emission cuts. Emission reductions triggered by carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are typically modest or relate to a baseline rather than absolute levels, even in cases where price levels are relatively high. Consequently, we posit that deep decarbonisation in line with the 1.5°C target can only be ensured by drawing on a portfolio approach, in which carbon pricing operates alongside other instruments including regulation and legal mandates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-61
Number of pages12
JournalCarbon and Climate Law Review
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

pricing
carbon
pollution tax
emissions trading
carbon emission
pillar
price level
climate policy
environmental policy
greenhouse gas
taxes
regulation
cost
ability
costs
evidence
emission reduction

Keywords

  • carbon Pricing
  • decarbonisation
  • 2°C
  • climate policy
  • Paris agreement
  • emissions trading
  • carbon Tax

Cite this

@article{c53a5deee7f744e5acb57da37f699393,
title = "Carbon pricing and the 1.5°C target: near-term decarbonisation and the importance of an instrument mix",
abstract = "Carbon pricing is routinely presented as the most efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore as an indispensable pillar of ambitious climate policy. For incremental emission reductions on the margin, this static perspective may be correct, expressing the ability of carbon pricing to identify and spur abatement options with the lowest cost. At the same time, meeting the 1.5°C target requires achievement of zero net emissions in the relatively near term, implying a need for full decarbonisation rather than marginal abatement. To date, there is only limited empirical evidence suggesting that carbon pricing has produced deep emission cuts. Emission reductions triggered by carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are typically modest or relate to a baseline rather than absolute levels, even in cases where price levels are relatively high. Consequently, we posit that deep decarbonisation in line with the 1.5°C target can only be ensured by drawing on a portfolio approach, in which carbon pricing operates alongside other instruments including regulation and legal mandates.",
keywords = "carbon Pricing, decarbonisation, 2°C, climate policy, Paris agreement, emissions trading, carbon Tax",
author = "Michael Mehling and Endre Tvinnereim",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "50--61",
journal = "Carbon and Climate Law Review",
issn = "1864-9904",
number = "1",

}

Carbon pricing and the 1.5°C target : near-term decarbonisation and the importance of an instrument mix. / Mehling, Michael; Tvinnereim, Endre.

In: Carbon and Climate Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 16.03.2018, p. 50-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon pricing and the 1.5°C target

T2 - near-term decarbonisation and the importance of an instrument mix

AU - Mehling, Michael

AU - Tvinnereim, Endre

PY - 2018/3/16

Y1 - 2018/3/16

N2 - Carbon pricing is routinely presented as the most efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore as an indispensable pillar of ambitious climate policy. For incremental emission reductions on the margin, this static perspective may be correct, expressing the ability of carbon pricing to identify and spur abatement options with the lowest cost. At the same time, meeting the 1.5°C target requires achievement of zero net emissions in the relatively near term, implying a need for full decarbonisation rather than marginal abatement. To date, there is only limited empirical evidence suggesting that carbon pricing has produced deep emission cuts. Emission reductions triggered by carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are typically modest or relate to a baseline rather than absolute levels, even in cases where price levels are relatively high. Consequently, we posit that deep decarbonisation in line with the 1.5°C target can only be ensured by drawing on a portfolio approach, in which carbon pricing operates alongside other instruments including regulation and legal mandates.

AB - Carbon pricing is routinely presented as the most efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore as an indispensable pillar of ambitious climate policy. For incremental emission reductions on the margin, this static perspective may be correct, expressing the ability of carbon pricing to identify and spur abatement options with the lowest cost. At the same time, meeting the 1.5°C target requires achievement of zero net emissions in the relatively near term, implying a need for full decarbonisation rather than marginal abatement. To date, there is only limited empirical evidence suggesting that carbon pricing has produced deep emission cuts. Emission reductions triggered by carbon taxes and emissions trading systems are typically modest or relate to a baseline rather than absolute levels, even in cases where price levels are relatively high. Consequently, we posit that deep decarbonisation in line with the 1.5°C target can only be ensured by drawing on a portfolio approach, in which carbon pricing operates alongside other instruments including regulation and legal mandates.

KW - carbon Pricing

KW - decarbonisation

KW - 2°C

KW - climate policy

KW - Paris agreement

KW - emissions trading

KW - carbon Tax

UR - https://cclr.lexxion.eu/article/CCLR/2018/1/9

U2 - 10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9

DO - 10.21552/cclr/2018/1/9

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 50

EP - 61

JO - Carbon and Climate Law Review

JF - Carbon and Climate Law Review

SN - 1864-9904

IS - 1

ER -