Capturing the value of peer support: measuring recovery-oriented services

Stacey L. Barrenger, Victoria Stanhope, Emma Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

LanguageEnglish
Pages180-187
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Public Mental Health
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date24 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Hope
Peer Review
Mental Health Services
Self Efficacy
Research
Values
Hospitalization
Health
evidence
research policy
research practice
evaluation
hospitalization
self-efficacy
empowerment
health service
mental health
Power (Psychology)
methodology
health

Keywords

  • peer support
  • mental health
  • health services
  • integrated health
  • recovery-oriented services
  • health care

Cite this

@article{cec73f4686104f46b8dbb4f17e1698a2,
title = "Capturing the value of peer support: measuring recovery-oriented services",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.",
keywords = "peer support, mental health, health services, integrated health, recovery-oriented services, health care",
author = "Barrenger, {Stacey L.} and Victoria Stanhope and Emma Miller",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "180--187",
journal = "Journal of Public Mental Health",
issn = "1746-5729",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

Capturing the value of peer support : measuring recovery-oriented services. / Barrenger, Stacey L.; Stanhope, Victoria; Miller, Emma.

In: Journal of Public Mental Health, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.09.2019, p. 180-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing the value of peer support

T2 - Journal of Public Mental Health

AU - Barrenger, Stacey L.

AU - Stanhope, Victoria

AU - Miller, Emma

PY - 2019/9/5

Y1 - 2019/9/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

KW - peer support

KW - mental health

KW - health services

KW - integrated health

KW - recovery-oriented services

KW - health care

UR - https://www.emeraldinsight.com/journal/jpmh

U2 - 10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022

DO - 10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 180

EP - 187

JO - Journal of Public Mental Health

JF - Journal of Public Mental Health

SN - 1746-5729

IS - 3

ER -