Capturing sociality in the movement between frames: an illustration from leadership development

Brigid Carroll, Barbara Simpson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    35 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we offer a dynamic relational perspective in which frames and framing work together in the practice of leadership development. Mead’s (1932) notion of sociality is introduced as a way of engaging with movements within and between frames, where it is these framing movements that we argue hold the potentiality of emergent practice. The paper responds to a growing interest in the delineation, conceptualization and practice of leadership as opposed to leader development, where we understand leadership development in terms of the creation of social capital, relational capacity and collaboration. However, there is little, if any research into how these dimensions may be intentionally developed in practice. Using online forum data from an 18-month long leadership development programme, we demonstrate three different sociality movements, which we have labeled kindling, stretching and spanning. Our analysis positions sociality at the core of leadership development interventions, and practice more generally.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1283-1309
    Number of pages27
    JournalHuman Relations
    Volume65
    Issue number10
    Early online date10 Sep 2012
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

    Fingerprint

    sociality
    Stretching
    leadership
    social capital
    Sociality
    Leadership Development
    Leadership development
    leader

    Keywords

    • framing
    • leadership
    • leadership development
    • relational leadership
    • sociality

    Cite this

    @article{2bb76fff9a2c476993f7b81b05d02fee,
    title = "Capturing sociality in the movement between frames: an illustration from leadership development",
    abstract = "In this paper we offer a dynamic relational perspective in which frames and framing work together in the practice of leadership development. Mead’s (1932) notion of sociality is introduced as a way of engaging with movements within and between frames, where it is these framing movements that we argue hold the potentiality of emergent practice. The paper responds to a growing interest in the delineation, conceptualization and practice of leadership as opposed to leader development, where we understand leadership development in terms of the creation of social capital, relational capacity and collaboration. However, there is little, if any research into how these dimensions may be intentionally developed in practice. Using online forum data from an 18-month long leadership development programme, we demonstrate three different sociality movements, which we have labeled kindling, stretching and spanning. Our analysis positions sociality at the core of leadership development interventions, and practice more generally.",
    keywords = "framing, leadership, leadership development, relational leadership, sociality",
    author = "Brigid Carroll and Barbara Simpson",
    year = "2012",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1177/0018726712451185",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "1283--1309",
    journal = "Human Relations",
    issn = "0018-7267",
    number = "10",

    }

    Capturing sociality in the movement between frames : an illustration from leadership development. / Carroll, Brigid; Simpson, Barbara.

    In: Human Relations, Vol. 65, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1283-1309.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Capturing sociality in the movement between frames

    T2 - Human Relations

    AU - Carroll, Brigid

    AU - Simpson, Barbara

    PY - 2012/10

    Y1 - 2012/10

    N2 - In this paper we offer a dynamic relational perspective in which frames and framing work together in the practice of leadership development. Mead’s (1932) notion of sociality is introduced as a way of engaging with movements within and between frames, where it is these framing movements that we argue hold the potentiality of emergent practice. The paper responds to a growing interest in the delineation, conceptualization and practice of leadership as opposed to leader development, where we understand leadership development in terms of the creation of social capital, relational capacity and collaboration. However, there is little, if any research into how these dimensions may be intentionally developed in practice. Using online forum data from an 18-month long leadership development programme, we demonstrate three different sociality movements, which we have labeled kindling, stretching and spanning. Our analysis positions sociality at the core of leadership development interventions, and practice more generally.

    AB - In this paper we offer a dynamic relational perspective in which frames and framing work together in the practice of leadership development. Mead’s (1932) notion of sociality is introduced as a way of engaging with movements within and between frames, where it is these framing movements that we argue hold the potentiality of emergent practice. The paper responds to a growing interest in the delineation, conceptualization and practice of leadership as opposed to leader development, where we understand leadership development in terms of the creation of social capital, relational capacity and collaboration. However, there is little, if any research into how these dimensions may be intentionally developed in practice. Using online forum data from an 18-month long leadership development programme, we demonstrate three different sociality movements, which we have labeled kindling, stretching and spanning. Our analysis positions sociality at the core of leadership development interventions, and practice more generally.

    KW - framing

    KW - leadership

    KW - leadership development

    KW - relational leadership

    KW - sociality

    U2 - 10.1177/0018726712451185

    DO - 10.1177/0018726712451185

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 1283

    EP - 1309

    JO - Human Relations

    JF - Human Relations

    SN - 0018-7267

    IS - 10

    ER -