Can short selling constraints explain the portfolio inefficiency of U.K. benchmark models?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study uses the Bayesian approach of Wang(1998) to examine the impact of no short selling constraints on the mean-variance inefficiency of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns and to conduct model comparison tests between the models. No short selling constraints lead to a substantial reduction in the mean-variance inefficiency of all factor models and eliminate the mean-variance inefficiency of some factor models in states when the lagged one-month U.K. Treasury Bill return is higher than normal. In model comparison tests, the best performing model is a six-factor model of Fama and French(2017a), which uses the small ends of the value, profitability, investment, and momentum factors.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages46
JournalAdvances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Inefficiency
Short selling
Benchmark
Mean-variance
Model comparison
Bayesian approach
Factors
Stock returns
Profitability
Momentum

Keywords

  • mean-variance efficiency
  • portfolio constraints
  • Bayesian analysis
  • factor models

Cite this

@article{6a4e9e45375d4f10be67b650c822e966,
title = "Can short selling constraints explain the portfolio inefficiency of U.K. benchmark models?",
abstract = "This study uses the Bayesian approach of Wang(1998) to examine the impact of no short selling constraints on the mean-variance inefficiency of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns and to conduct model comparison tests between the models. No short selling constraints lead to a substantial reduction in the mean-variance inefficiency of all factor models and eliminate the mean-variance inefficiency of some factor models in states when the lagged one-month U.K. Treasury Bill return is higher than normal. In model comparison tests, the best performing model is a six-factor model of Fama and French(2017a), which uses the small ends of the value, profitability, investment, and momentum factors.",
keywords = "mean-variance efficiency, portfolio constraints, Bayesian analysis, factor models",
author = "Jonathan Fletcher",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "21",
language = "English",
journal = "Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can short selling constraints explain the portfolio inefficiency of U.K. benchmark models?

AU - Fletcher, Jonathan

PY - 2017/8/21

Y1 - 2017/8/21

N2 - This study uses the Bayesian approach of Wang(1998) to examine the impact of no short selling constraints on the mean-variance inefficiency of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns and to conduct model comparison tests between the models. No short selling constraints lead to a substantial reduction in the mean-variance inefficiency of all factor models and eliminate the mean-variance inefficiency of some factor models in states when the lagged one-month U.K. Treasury Bill return is higher than normal. In model comparison tests, the best performing model is a six-factor model of Fama and French(2017a), which uses the small ends of the value, profitability, investment, and momentum factors.

AB - This study uses the Bayesian approach of Wang(1998) to examine the impact of no short selling constraints on the mean-variance inefficiency of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns and to conduct model comparison tests between the models. No short selling constraints lead to a substantial reduction in the mean-variance inefficiency of all factor models and eliminate the mean-variance inefficiency of some factor models in states when the lagged one-month U.K. Treasury Bill return is higher than normal. In model comparison tests, the best performing model is a six-factor model of Fama and French(2017a), which uses the small ends of the value, profitability, investment, and momentum factors.

KW - mean-variance efficiency

KW - portfolio constraints

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - factor models

UR - https://doi.org/10.6291/AIAPM

M3 - Article

JO - Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management

T2 - Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management

JF - Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management

ER -