Calling the judiciary to account for the past: transitional justice and judicial accountability in Nigeria

Hakeem Yusuf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Institutional and individual accountability is an important feature of societies in
transition from conflict or authoritarian rule. The imperative of accountability
has both normative and transformational underpinnings in the context of restoration of the rule of law and democracy. This article argues a case for extending the purview of truth-telling processes to the judiciary in postauthoritarian contexts. The driving force behind the inquiry is the proposition that the judiciary as the third arm of government at all times participates in governance. To contextualize the argument, I focus on judicial governance and accountability within the paradigm of Nigeria’s transition to democracy after decades of authoritarian military rule.
LanguageEnglish
Pages194-226
Number of pages33
JournalLaw and Policy
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date19 Mar 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

judiciary
Nigeria
justice
governance
democracy
responsibility
constitutional state
restoration
Military
paradigm
society
time

Keywords

  • judiciary
  • past
  • transitional justice
  • judicial accountability
  • nigeria
  • post military rule

Cite this

@article{566d444ae80749368a3ff1bbc5dc91e5,
title = "Calling the judiciary to account for the past: transitional justice and judicial accountability in Nigeria",
abstract = "Institutional and individual accountability is an important feature of societies intransition from conflict or authoritarian rule. The imperative of accountabilityhas both normative and transformational underpinnings in the context of restoration of the rule of law and democracy. This article argues a case for extending the purview of truth-telling processes to the judiciary in postauthoritarian contexts. The driving force behind the inquiry is the proposition that the judiciary as the third arm of government at all times participates in governance. To contextualize the argument, I focus on judicial governance and accountability within the paradigm of Nigeria’s transition to democracy after decades of authoritarian military rule.",
keywords = "judiciary, past, transitional justice, judicial accountability, nigeria, post military rule",
author = "Hakeem Yusuf",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00274.x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "194--226",
journal = "Law and Policy",
issn = "0265-8240",
number = "2",

}

Calling the judiciary to account for the past : transitional justice and judicial accountability in Nigeria. / Yusuf, Hakeem.

In: Law and Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 194-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calling the judiciary to account for the past

T2 - Law and Policy

AU - Yusuf, Hakeem

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Institutional and individual accountability is an important feature of societies intransition from conflict or authoritarian rule. The imperative of accountabilityhas both normative and transformational underpinnings in the context of restoration of the rule of law and democracy. This article argues a case for extending the purview of truth-telling processes to the judiciary in postauthoritarian contexts. The driving force behind the inquiry is the proposition that the judiciary as the third arm of government at all times participates in governance. To contextualize the argument, I focus on judicial governance and accountability within the paradigm of Nigeria’s transition to democracy after decades of authoritarian military rule.

AB - Institutional and individual accountability is an important feature of societies intransition from conflict or authoritarian rule. The imperative of accountabilityhas both normative and transformational underpinnings in the context of restoration of the rule of law and democracy. This article argues a case for extending the purview of truth-telling processes to the judiciary in postauthoritarian contexts. The driving force behind the inquiry is the proposition that the judiciary as the third arm of government at all times participates in governance. To contextualize the argument, I focus on judicial governance and accountability within the paradigm of Nigeria’s transition to democracy after decades of authoritarian military rule.

KW - judiciary

KW - past

KW - transitional justice

KW - judicial accountability

KW - nigeria

KW - post military rule

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00274.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00274.x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 194

EP - 226

JO - Law and Policy

JF - Law and Policy

SN - 0265-8240

IS - 2

ER -