Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly

Jonathan Emery-Barker, Iain McClure, Alison Wood, Rachel Robertson, David Young, Helen Minnis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Sometimes there is a need to answer important clinical questions quickly. Bureaucracy can erect an insurmountable barrier. The Research Governance Framework (RGF) for Health and Social Care was introduced in England in 2005 aiming to improve the efficiency and quality of research in the NHS, but has unwittingly introduced a new layer of bureaucracy which is preventing some important questions being answered. We attempted to survey prescribing practices among UK psychiatrists in response to an urgent need for this information. There was huge variation between the responses of Research and Development (R and D) offices and our capacity to address the requirements of each office was overwhelmed. R and D approval can now be impossible to obtain. This implies the need for a radical rethink of the system. Scotland is now leading the way in the development of the first UK Multicentre R and D committee which aims to create a standardised and more simple system.
LanguageEnglish
Pages217-218
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Research
Scotland
England
Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • bureaucracy
  • mathematics
  • statistics
  • research

Cite this

Emery-Barker, Jonathan ; McClure, Iain ; Wood, Alison ; Robertson, Rachel ; Young, David ; Minnis, Helen. / Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly. In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 101, No. 5. pp. 217-218.
@article{b669dd3d0d7642009be8b9f5b9996931,
title = "Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly",
abstract = "Sometimes there is a need to answer important clinical questions quickly. Bureaucracy can erect an insurmountable barrier. The Research Governance Framework (RGF) for Health and Social Care was introduced in England in 2005 aiming to improve the efficiency and quality of research in the NHS, but has unwittingly introduced a new layer of bureaucracy which is preventing some important questions being answered. We attempted to survey prescribing practices among UK psychiatrists in response to an urgent need for this information. There was huge variation between the responses of Research and Development (R and D) offices and our capacity to address the requirements of each office was overwhelmed. R and D approval can now be impossible to obtain. This implies the need for a radical rethink of the system. Scotland is now leading the way in the development of the first UK Multicentre R and D committee which aims to create a standardised and more simple system.",
keywords = "bureaucracy, mathematics, statistics, research",
author = "Jonathan Emery-Barker and Iain McClure and Alison Wood and Rachel Robertson and David Young and Helen Minnis",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1258/jrsm.2008.080046",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "217--218",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine",
issn = "0141-0768",
number = "5",

}

Emery-Barker, J, McClure, I, Wood, A, Robertson, R, Young, D & Minnis, H 2008, 'Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly' Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 217-218. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.080046

Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly. / Emery-Barker, Jonathan; McClure, Iain; Wood, Alison; Robertson, Rachel; Young, David; Minnis, Helen.

In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 101, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 217-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly

AU - Emery-Barker, Jonathan

AU - McClure, Iain

AU - Wood, Alison

AU - Robertson, Rachel

AU - Young, David

AU - Minnis, Helen

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Sometimes there is a need to answer important clinical questions quickly. Bureaucracy can erect an insurmountable barrier. The Research Governance Framework (RGF) for Health and Social Care was introduced in England in 2005 aiming to improve the efficiency and quality of research in the NHS, but has unwittingly introduced a new layer of bureaucracy which is preventing some important questions being answered. We attempted to survey prescribing practices among UK psychiatrists in response to an urgent need for this information. There was huge variation between the responses of Research and Development (R and D) offices and our capacity to address the requirements of each office was overwhelmed. R and D approval can now be impossible to obtain. This implies the need for a radical rethink of the system. Scotland is now leading the way in the development of the first UK Multicentre R and D committee which aims to create a standardised and more simple system.

AB - Sometimes there is a need to answer important clinical questions quickly. Bureaucracy can erect an insurmountable barrier. The Research Governance Framework (RGF) for Health and Social Care was introduced in England in 2005 aiming to improve the efficiency and quality of research in the NHS, but has unwittingly introduced a new layer of bureaucracy which is preventing some important questions being answered. We attempted to survey prescribing practices among UK psychiatrists in response to an urgent need for this information. There was huge variation between the responses of Research and Development (R and D) offices and our capacity to address the requirements of each office was overwhelmed. R and D approval can now be impossible to obtain. This implies the need for a radical rethink of the system. Scotland is now leading the way in the development of the first UK Multicentre R and D committee which aims to create a standardised and more simple system.

KW - bureaucracy

KW - mathematics

KW - statistics

KW - research

UR - http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/17490/

U2 - 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080046

DO - 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080046

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 217

EP - 218

JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

T2 - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

SN - 0141-0768

IS - 5

ER -